Amongst all the bickering from both sides on whether it was right for Novak Djokovic to be deported or not lies one crucial point that, until now, hasn’t received the public attention it should have.
www.news.com.au
There was so much
confusion around whether contracting Covid in the past six months was a valid reason to not be vaccinated. Tennis Australia was under the impression from Victorian authorities it was justified,
but letters from Federal Health Minister Greg Hunt to TA in November clearly stated a recent infection was not grounds to receive a medical exemption.
That rule should exist for people who want to be vaccinated, but can’t, because of a recent infection. That’s a valid medical reason.
If you have an acute medical illness or something that holds you back from getting it, no problem...
“
Past confirmed infection with SARS-CoV-2 is not a contraindication to vaccination. ATAGI recommends that
vaccination should be deferred in those with PCR confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection until complete recovery from the acute illness,” reads the guidance on medical exemptions to vaccinations.
“These
individuals should be vaccinated as soon as they have recovered from acute illness, regardless of disease severity, and within 6 months after onset of the SARS- CoV-2 infection.
“People who
have received an anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibody or convalescent plasma should defer future doses of COVID-19 vaccine for at least 90 days.
Chronic symptoms following COVID-19 (”long COVID”) is not a contraindication to COVID-19 vaccines but does warrant a clinical discussion with the patient.”
It could be argued even after recovering from his recent bout of Covid, he would still refuse to be vaccinated — again making it unfair that he should use his December infection
to jump through a loophole that was created for people in very different situations to him. Again,
those are people who actually want to be vaccinated but can’t for legitimate medical reasons.
Eve vi... Pojasno od ova ZDRAVJE.
@SkimSkam TA e izvestena za uslovite uste vo Noemvri. Ko sto rekov ima email sto moze da se najde na net. Viktoriskata komisija veke e kazano relevantna e SAMO za vlez vo Viktorija.
Novak vo nitu eden moment nemase accute medical illness. Nema dokumenti za toa.
@rokoko tuka e klucnata razlika. Nie ne znaeme sto dokumenti imaat hrvatot i chehinjata prilozeno. Nekade procitav deka edniot ima 3 a drugiot 4 dodatni beleski od RAZLICNI lokalni doktori za nivnite kondicii odnosno deka imaat nekoja forma na acute medical illness. Problemot e sto ova tolku bezvrska definirano sto ona sto e acute medical illness u CRO ne znaci deka e i u AUS. Ubavo bi bilo da izlezat so jasna definicija sto e toa, sto veruvam i ima nekade na nivnite strani/emailovi ama bar zasega nemam videno jasna definicija. Znam edna od kondiciite e onaa bolest strav od igli i inekcii, imase na vesti eden takov slucaj... Drugo imas ovde podole znaci ako si primal krv/plasma... Od ona sto se zborese na vesti ima samo 4-5 moznosti za da se dobie vakvov examption od federalnata vlada za vlez vo AUS.
Na kraj povtorno se vrakam e na karakterot... Jasno e kazano deka ovoj vid na exemption e za luge sto SAKAAT da se vakciniraat ama ednostavno ne se vo sostojba momentalno. Od sekoj se ocekuva da se vakcinira vo najbrz rok, ovde i da si prelezal ocekuvaat da se vakciniras nezavisno dali imas ili nemas antitela. Ako vazi toa za AUS mora da vazi i za stranci.
Novak ednostavno NE GI ISPOLNUVA USLOVITE ZA VLEZ, ne gi ispolni togas, ne gi ispolnuva ni sega. Vleze samo radi toa sto granicarite napravija propust pri ukinuvanjeto na vizata. Prvoto sudenje bese tokmu za toa. Novak se zalese deka mu bea skrateni pravata, sto i mu bea i si dobi fer. Nikoj ne se buni za toa.
Vtoroto sudenje bese deka negovata pojava ovde moze ima nesakani posledici za AUS. Ministerot odluci da upotrebi diskreciono pravo za da se oslobodi od nekoj sto sekako ne trebase da e vo AUS. Ova bese polesen, siguren i brz nacin da se dojde do celta. Celta si ja ostvarija na kraj.