SERGEY LAVROV:
[Could you comment on the results of the Munich Security Conference? What has caused the hysterical statements by Western leaders, who insisted that the EU must take part in the talks on Ukraine?]
"I can only say about the results of the Munich conference:
Everyone must be held responsible for their actions.
When you violate justice for years, stamping on your own principles of equality, fair competition, presumption of innocence, inviolability of property, freedom of speech and information, when all these principles are mercilessly trampled underfoot, others’ assets are plundered contrary to the norms of international law, and the Nazi Kiev regime is nurtured and supplied with weapons for killing its own citizens, this will not go unpunished.
They did that in the hope of escaping scot-free under a nuclear umbrella.
But this will not happen.
You will receive what is due for what you have done, as the Bible says.
As for these countries’ striving to take part in the talks on Ukraine, they had this opportunity many times before.
In February 2014, the EU, in particular France and Germany, signed an agreement between President of Ukraine Viktor Yanukovych and the armed opposition, guaranteeing its implementation.
The agreement provided for creating a transition national unity government and holding early [presidential] elections.
The process would have only taken five or six months, but the opposition trampled down on the agreement next morning.
We appealed to its guarantors, the European neighbours – Germany and France.
They shyly replied that what happened, happened.
Democracy sometimes takes unusual forms in the course of its development.
That was their first chance.
Their second chance was the Minsk agreements.
The leaders of Russia, France, Germany and Ukraine spent over 17 hours checking every comma in a document on the settlement of the Ukrainian crisis through granting a special status to a certain area in Donbass as part of the integral Ukrainian state.
That plan was unanimously approved in a UN Security Council resolution.
But the Ukrainian party violated that agreement within days of signing it.
Instead of a ceasefire and troop withdrawal, it bombed Donbass.
Instead of restoring the economic integrity of Ukraine, it imposed a water blockade on Crimea, and so on.
Later, when Mme Merkel and Mr Hollande "retired" and spoke with journalists more freely, they openly admitted that they never planned to honour anything.
They said that they only needed time to arm Ukraine.
These were their chances.
They have made new calls at the Munich conference.
For example, President of Finland Alexander Stubb, a close neighbour that was once a neutral state and called "for everything good and against everything bad," stated that what they needed was a ceasefire, which they would use to build up Ukraine’s military.
So, the Europeans’ "philosophy" has not changed.
That is why I do not know why they should sit at the negotiating table.
Why should they be invited if they will try to push through crafty schemes such as a ceasefire, while hatching plans, as they like and usually do, for continuing the war?"
Ти се убаво си пишуваш но попусто. Македонецот е државотворно неосвестен чека некој друг да ја заврши работата за него. Дури и да имаме не знам каква поддршка од некоја голема сила САД или РФ едноставно народот не е како албанскиот. Таму доколку се решат на востание ќе решат. Се шпекулира дека учк во периодот 1998/99 броела 25.000-30.000 војници. Значи без државна апаратура успеале да се мобилизираат. Тие знаеле дека некој поголем ќе интервенира но секоја им чест сепак се самоорганизирале.
