Викиликс дали свесно или несвесно работи за агендата која што крајната цел е глобална супер држава. Е сега за да се создаде таква држава треба наполно да се уништат старите супер сили како што дојде на ред СССР така на ред и денес е САД, која што ја користат самата против себе. Идејата е уште некој фронт воен да се отвори дали со Иран или С. Кореја па на остатокот од светот да му дојде преку глава од САД и да речат расформирајте ја нека влезе во унија заедно со Мексико и Канада. Тоа тие и чекаат.....
Што мислите дали е случајно така оставено политичарите да се корумпирани и да крадат до курца, па едноставно планирано е да биде така да се предизвика апатија кај рајата и да рече што е битно за кого гласаме и за што гласаме сите се тука дојдени само да украдат, не е важно кој владее. Тоа тие и чекаат да ја дадете својата моќ на одлучување и рассудување и да бидете апатични роботи машини на фабричката лента.....
--- надополнето ---
[SIZE=+3]Wikileaks  The Tel Aviv Connection[/SIZE][SIZE=+1]
  By Jeff Gates
  11-30-10[/SIZE]           [SIZE=+1]What is Tel Aviv to do now that it's known Israelis and     pro-Israelis 'fixed' the intelligence that induced the U.S. to war in Iraq?[/SIZE]           [SIZE=+1]Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.     Con me consistently for six decades and the relationship is over, as is     Israel's credibility as a legitimate nation state. [/SIZE]           [SIZE=+1]Tel Aviv knows this. But what can the Zionist state do     about it? Answer: Wikileaks.[/SIZE]           [SIZE=+1]Why now? Misdirection. Shine the spotlight on Washington     to take it off Tel Aviv. That's good old-fashioned psy-ops.  And challenge     the credibility of the U.S. That's Wikileaks.[/SIZE]           [SIZE=+1]Any credible forensics would start by asking: to whose     benefit? Then look to means, motive and opportunity plus the presence of     stable nation-state intelligence inside the U.S.[/SIZE]           [SIZE=+1]Other than Israel, who else is a credible candidate?     Notice how quickly Israel's role in the peace process vanished from the     news. Now it's Iran, Iran and more Iran. To whose benefit?[/SIZE]           [SIZE=+1]Tel Aviv knows that the phony intelligence on Iraq leads     to those skilled at waging war "by way of deception"-the motto     of the Israeli Mossad. Wikileaks are noteworthy for what's missing: the     absence of any material damaging to Israeli goals. [/SIZE]           [SIZE=+1]But still Tel Aviv faces an unprecedented peril: transparency.     Americans know they were duped. And Israel rightly fears that Americans     will soon realize by whom.[/SIZE]           [SIZE=+1]Tepid Support will not Suffice[/SIZE]           [SIZE=+1]Obama has behaved as anticipated by those who produced     his presidency. Anyone surprised at the lack of change in U.S. policy in     the Middle East fails to grasp the power of the Israel lobby.[/SIZE]           [SIZE=+1]Did he hesitate to support their latest Israeli strategy     for scuttling peace negotiations? Absent peace, the U.S. will continue     to be the target of those outraged at America's unflinching support for     Israel's thuggish behavior in pursuit of its expansionist goals. [/SIZE]           [SIZE=+1]Confirming the lobby's influence, Netanyahu announced     he would not agree to halt settlements on Palestinian land until Obama     reduced to writing a $3 billion bribe.[/SIZE]           [SIZE=+1]In return for a proposed 90-day freeze, what form of     bribe will America provide? Twenty F-35 jets at $150 million each plus     parts, maintenance, training and armaments. [/SIZE]           [SIZE=+1]That's $231 million per week or $1,373,626 per hour.     What will the U.S. receive in return? A temporary partial freeze on settlements.     How many more times can this ruse work? [/SIZE]           [SIZE=+1]Israel has evaded a peace agreement since it drove Palestinians     from their land in 1948 and seized more land in 1967 to shape today's geopolitics.     [/SIZE]           [SIZE=+1]Should Israel reach an agreement with the Palestinians,     Secretary of State Hillary Clinton proposes a "comprehensive security     agreement." At what cost no one knows. The U.S. Congress has already     budgeted $30 billion for Israel over 10 years. This latest $3 billion is     on top of that. [/SIZE]           [SIZE=+1]That doesn't include the cost to American credibility     posed by an offer to veto U.N. recognition of Palestine as a state. And     a pledge Never Again to pressure Israel on settlements. Plus the freeze     omits East Jerusalem where Tel Aviv insists on moving ahead with new housing     starts.[/SIZE]           [SIZE=+1]Timing Is Everything[/SIZE]           [SIZE=+1]By scheduling its latest incursion into Gaza between     Christmas 2008 and the January 2009 Obama inaugural, Tel Aviv ensured only     muted opposition during political down time in the U.S. Thus it came as     no surprise to see an agent provocateur operation on Thanksgiving Day 2010     as Israel demolished a West Bank Mosque and a Palestinian village.  [/SIZE]           [SIZE=+1]After seven hours of nonstop talks, Hillary Clinton praised     Netanyahu as a "peacemaker." In return, he agreed only to "continue     the process." Meanwhile, U.S. elections marked a major victory for     Israel when incoming Republican Majority Leader Eric Cantor, a Jewish Zionist,     announced that the new majority would "serve as a check on the Obama     administration." [/SIZE]           [SIZE=+1]The Israel lobby has good reason to gloat. Confirming     ongoing duplicity, Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman proclaimed:     "a permanent agreement is impossible." [/SIZE]           [SIZE=+1]Wikileaks' release of confidential diplomatic cables     provides Israel an opportunity to undermine U.S. relations worldwide while     also inflicting lasting damage on U.S. interests in the Middle East. After     this, what nation would trust the U.S. to maintain a confidence?[/SIZE]           [SIZE=+1]In October, Turkey asked that the U.S. not share intelligence     with Israel. Now who dares share intelligence with the U.S.?[/SIZE]           [SIZE=+1]This may signal the beginning of the end for the Obama     presidency his domestic policy failures are eclipsed by his failures in     foreign policy. [/SIZE]           [SIZE=+1]This may also signal pre-staging for the 2012 presidential     primary with a weakened Obama forced to name Clinton as his running mate     or stepping aside so she can lead the ballot.[/SIZE]           [SIZE=+1]Her 2008 presidential campaign promised recognition of     Israel as a "Jewish state" and promised an "undivided Jerusalem     as the capital." Tel Aviv was elated. A second Clinton presidency     would ensure another victory for Israel-and no peace.[/SIZE]           [SIZE=+1]Israeli psy-ops typically serve multiple purposes. Wikileaks     is no exception. [/SIZE]
http://rense.com/general92/wik.htm