Фан Клуб: Арсенал

[Mad_Coko]

Ауриер никој нема да го коментира??

Две асистенции

 

[Scirea]

Ако Арсен не го земе назад Кембел, значи не е со сите... Верувам дека Венгер ќе го извлече максимумот од него, само проблемот е во тоа уште колку време ќе го дава на позајмици. Греота е да скапува во клубови од типот на Олимпијакос, а во Арсенал да играат играчи од типот на Бендтнер

 

[KembaW]

Ауриер никој нема да го коментира??

@Makedonec_7

 

[Makedonec_7]

@Makedonec_7

Две асистенции, и тоа квалитетни. Директен учесник во головите, тоа е тоа. Не треба коментар, нели ? Само будала би рекол дека, денес, не беше добар за Брегот. Но, ако ги бирал за кај нас, на прво место би го ставил Колман.

 

[Ashburton Grove]

Wenger on french TV: "We have a world class striker joining us next season. He played tonight. Joel Campbell".

Real Sociedad have removed Arsenal's buy-back clause in Vela's contract by paying the Gunners £8.8m. So far Arsenal have made £14.4m from Vela and Cesc deals.
[AS]

Се прегазив на фоткава

Arsene Wenger watching Joel Campbell like....

 

[Bateman]

Како е, ништо битно не се десило, освен некои си поранешен капитен што отишол во граскиот ривал, ама голема работа, битно се почна летото со профит.

 

[Makedonec_7]

Како е, ништо битно не се десило, освен некои си поранешен капитен што отишол во граскиот ривал, ама голема работа, битно се почна летото со профит.

А ако на ова го придодадеме и тоа дека Вермален би заминал во Јунајтед, имаме лето за мерак. 3ца играчи во 3тима кои се конкуренти за титула.

 

[Bateman]

А ако на ова го придодадеме и тоа дека Вермален би заминал во Јунајтед, имаме лето за мерак. 3ца играчи во 3тима кои се конкуренти за титула.

Се е тоа некое тајно сценарио на Венгер, којзнае со каков играч ќе не изненади по Светското, сигурно некоја класа како Саного.

 

[Makedonec_7]

Или ќе мисли дека со Џоел Кембел доволно сме силни

 

[Cannon]

Или ќе мисли дека со Џоел Кембел доволно сме силни

Should Campball stay with Arsenal, Wenger would still target a new striker.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/fo...star-Joel-Campbell-his-chance-at-Arsenal.html[DOUBLEPOST=1402854009][/DOUBLEPOST]http://www.arsenalreport.com/ix/the-fabregas-saga-part-ii-what-the-hell-is-mourinho-smoking/
Трансферот на Цеск, разгледан од еден друг агол, кој можам да кажам дека горе доле држи вода и оваа теза.
Повелете прочитајте
The Fabregas saga, part II: What the hell is Mourinho smoking?

Cesc Fabregas, despite being quoted more than once saying he’d never play for another English team than Arsenal, has signed for José Mourinho’s Chelsea. The biggest question mark of all is why Mourinho would even want Fabregas in his team. Not because of polarising philosophies (Mourinho isn’t the same bus-parking strategist as he was in his first stint with Chelsea, or with Inter Milan), but rather because Fabregas is notoriously positionally undisciplined – and positioning is something Mourinho’s whole system and strategy depends on.

When Fabregas came back to Barcelona, the general consensus was that the natural successor to Xavi had been installed to ensure the club seamlessly transforms into the next generation without losing momentum. However, the celebrations faded quickly as Pep Guardiola struggled to get Fabregas to play with discipline and urgency.

Fabregas had been played as a free-roaming #10 at Arsenal where he could get away with walking around the pitch waiting for his teammates to pass him the ball. But at Barcelona, Fabregas was quickly surprised at the level of training he had to go through, saying:

We train more, here, definitely. It was different at Arsenal. Sometimes after games we’d stay inside the gym but here we’re always outside, with the ball, practising, working tactically. Even if we play almost every three days we hardly have a day off. We train a lot – nearly every day

Fabregas also found it hard to adapt to a central midfield role further down the pitch, saying:

Playing as an interior means you have to be disciplined, to keep your position, and sometimes I lack the patience of [Sergio] Busquets and Xavi [Hernandez]. It is not easy. It’s completely different. Everyone has their own place and it’s important you stick to your position

Guardiola became frustrated at Cesc’s lack of concentration, but felt he had to play him. He was played in midfield, on the wings, anywhere Pep could fit him. But being played on the flanks meant Barcelona lost their devastating wide pace, and being played in the middle meant Barca lost it’s vital midfield shape. What Fabregas really wanted was to play in the position he did at Arsenal, saying:

At Barca it is really difficult because the best player in history, Messi, plays in my position

The real issue here was that Fabregas had become so accustomed to his relaxed role at Arsenal that the requirements for playing somewhere else were overwhelming. He simply didn’t have the necessary skills in his repertoire. Another player at Barcelona did, however. His name was Thiago, and the arrival of Fabregas meant the death of Thiago’s future at Barcelona.

So why is Cesc playing for Chelsea, and not Arsenal? Let’s be clear about something: Cesc Fabregas is in this business to win trophies, not to make other people happy. He left Arsenal to win trophies with Barcelona. Being homesick had nothing to do with it – does anyone think Fabregas would have let his friends talk on his behalf for years before forcing a move by refusing to train, if Barcelona were relegation candidates? No, Fabregas was desperate to play for what was being billed as the best team in the world at that time. It being his childhood club just meant Fabregas could use emotional reasons to soften the blow and still keep supporters on his side.

He even admitted in The Guardian in 2011 that this was the case, saying:

I want to be in a club that is able to win the big titles year after year and I don’t see that kind of future for Arsenal. They won’t be able to push the other big clubs in England away. If you look at the team this season I can’t see them finishing in front of teams like Manchester United or City, or Chelsea. There’s just too big a difference between the squads. Part of my decision to leave was that I find it hard to see Arsenal winning the Premier League or Champions League in the near future

So when Barcelona now aren’t world-beaters anymore, it shouldn’t come as a surprise to anyone that Fabregas all of a sudden is homesick for London, where, coincidentally, a team with near-limitless funds and a very good manager resides. Cesc himself is trying to play it off as Arsenal would have been his preferred choice, but let’s not pretend Fabregas believes he has a bigger chance of winning a trophy here than at Chelsea.

Chelsea was probably always the preferred destination. Arsenal not attempting to sign him was the best possible outcome for Fabregas, who can now shift focus from being a mercenary to being a victim of an unfortunate situation. He would have a hard time trying to explain his choice if we’d been interested.

There are two main reasons Arsene Wenger didn’t want to bring Fabregas back:

1. The #10 position is the last position we need to strengthen, we already have Özil, Ramsey, Wilshere, Rosicky, Cazorla and even fringe players like Diaby or Eisfeld who sees this position as their natural one.
2. Fabregas’ wage demands are way above what the club has set as an upper limit. In fact, I wouldn’t be surprised if this was the primary reason. Why should we give Fabregas £180k/week?

It’s simply not viable to spend about £18m (buy back clause minus what Barcelona still owe us for Alex Song) on a player we simply don’t “need”. The argument that he’d be great to have in the case of injuries is fine, but what does he do until then, who would he replace?

But for me, the most interesting question is what he’ll be doing at Chelsea. Oscar is a fantastic prospect for the #10 position and will no doubt have an amazing World Cup. What is Mourinho planning? And if the always-calm Guardiola occasionally lost the plot over Fabregas’ lack of positional discipline, how will Mourinho react when Fabregas walks around on the pitch looking for fucks to give?

A subforward line of Hazard-Oscar-Fabregas playing behind Diego Costa sounds like a fantastic attacking force on paper, but I simply can’t see Fabregas all of a sudden respecting his position and becoming a hard-working central midfielder. As a £10m squad option, Fabregas is very good. But as a £27m marquee signing, Chelsea might just have lost their mind.​

 

[Гард]

Сериозна ли е повредата на нашиот физиотерапевт?

 

[Bateman]

Венгер или направи страшно храбар потег со одбивањето на Цеск или уште една голема глупост која ќе го кошта клубот на долг рок. Без оглед на трофејот во ФА купот, неуспешен трансфер период ќе го навлече гневот на навивачите, сега сите се резервирани само заради фактот што сметаат дека Фабрегас е одбиен заради некои приоритетни позиции на кој треба да дојдат некои ептен добри играчи.

 

[Makedonec_7]

Венгер или направи страшно храбар потег со одбивањето на Цеск или уште една голема глупост која ќе го кошта клубот на долг рок. Без оглед на трофејот во ФА купот, неуспешен трансфер период ќе го навлече гневот на навивачите, сега сите се резервирани само заради фактот што сметаат дека Фабрегас е одбиен заради некои приоритетни позиции на кој треба да дојдат некои ептен добри играчи.

Ептен добри играчи за мене се класа напаѓач, класа десен бек и еден добар АМФ или ДМФ и добар квалитетен втор голман. Толку и задоволен сум. Шанса да добие Кембел, заслужи дечкото. Повеќе шанса за младите во Лига Купот. Го имаме Дијаби, не заборавајте.

 

[Bateman]

Тие се позициите дефинитивно.

 

[KembaW]

И нов фитнес тренер