Vanlok
deus ex machina
- Член од
- 30 мај 2009
- Мислења
- 25.724
- Поени од реакции
- 33.968
IME е познат бекдор, уште одамна одамна.
Последно уредено:
IME е познат бекдор, уште одамна одамна.
One of China's top economists has provided his interpretation of why the country's leaders could soon overcome their long-standing aversion of aggressive monetary and fiscal stimulus measures. Yu Yongding (余永定), a researcher at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS) and head of the China World Economy Association (中国世界经济学会), points out that Beijing has long been averse to piling up debt via the pursuit of reckless stimulus. "For a long time, China's macro-economic policy has stressed the removal of overcapacity, avoiding the adoption of short-term stimulus measures, avoiding deficit expansion , and avoiding excess money supply growth," Yu wrote in an online opinion piece. "Instead, the focus has been on growing effective supply and unleashing domestic demand." Yu points in particular two main reasons for why China "hasn't immediately adopted expansive fiscal and monetary policy despite deflationary pressure." The first is Beijing's preoccupation with addressing the long-standing problem of overcapacity in the Chinese economy. If anything, a splurge in fiscal stimulus could exacerbate the issue and cause further problems down the road for the Chinese economy. "Overcapacity at the macro-level is equal to insufficient aggregate demand," Yu writes. "Inadequate macro-demand can co-exist with overcapacity in industry, and there is often a time lag...overcapacity is often the result of excess investment from two or three years previously." Yu further points out that the government lacks macro-economic policy tools for dealing with industrial overcapacity, and that this is dilemma which is best address by means of market adjustments. A second major reason for China's reluctance to pursue aggressive stimulus measures is what Yu refers to as "excessive concern over China's high levels of leverage" - in particular government and corporate leverage. "[Policymakers] believe that they do not have room to implement expansive fiscal and monetary policy - in particular expansive fiscal policy." Yu believes this reluctance to implement stimulus policy could now be on the wane, however, given recent signals from Beijing as well as the country's weakening economic performance. China's economy could struggle to hit its annual GDP growth target of 5% for 2024, with the latest Q3 data revealing a slew of lacklustre metrics. Fixed investment grew by just 3.4% YoY for the first three quarter of 2024, while retail sales growth came in at 3.3%. While manufacturing investment rose 9.2% for the first three quarters, real estate development investment dropped 10.1%, indicating that one of China's mainstay economic sectors is still in an enervated. China's policymakers responded by unveiling a slew of monetary and fiscal stimulus measures since the end of September, including cuts to the required reserve ratio that are expected to unleash 1 trillion yuan in long-term liquidity, as well as reductions to policy rates and plans to step up government bond issuance. Yu also points out that recent statements from Beijing have placed greater emphasis on shoring up aggregate demand. "The December 2022 Central Economic Work Conference and the 2023 Government Work report both made reference to inadequate aggregate demand being the outstanding contradiction currently faced by the economy," Yu writes. "This signals a major adjustment to China's macro-economic policy settings."
Се отвора лесно сметка кај нив?Прегледај го приврзокот 433310
u kusi crti ova u finansiskiot svet e ramno na nuklearka. megu redovi bankata na piratite i glaven perac na pari vo svetot ke gi povrzi swift i brics sistemot preku HK i so toa ke stavi kraj na globalnoto sledenje na kapital od amerite... stom kesot dojde vo HK lesno ke go snema ponatamu.
ako imas pari sve e mozno. jas gi koristam sekade, so 200k deposit ili kredit za kuka vo aus mozese da otvoris smetka vo bilo koja drzava bez da ides tamu, faka nekolku meseci i treba so sluzbenik da gi popolnis relevantnite formulari za jurustikcijata kade sakas smetka i cekas nekolku nedeli da ti otvorat smetka. kartici ti stigaat na adresata sto si ja obral. prakanje pari od drzava u drzava na tvoja smetka e instantno i bez provizija, mozes da go napravis vo poveke valuti... kako sto rekov banka na piratiteСе отвора лесно сметка кај нив?
citaj ubavo, za da mozes da otvoris smetka vo drugi drzavi treba da ispolnuvas odredeni uslovi. znaci prviot bese 200k (sega e 150k) dolari da imas oroceno kaj niv ili kredit od pola mil dolari (ova ne sum siguren dali e taka, ali sega ima opcija da deponiras 9k mesecno, znaci sakaat luge so nad 160k plata), ova e za aus. naplakaat i 35 dolari mesecno za obsluzuvanje na site smetki vo site juristikcii. ova moze da se izbegne ako imas investicii so niv ili pogolem kredit. treba da stanes del od HSBC premier banking, sto ne e tesko ako imas biznis vo aus ili bilo koja zapadna drzava. eve vi link za aus, pobarajte si za u vasite drzavi ako ima HSBC banka.Dali dobro te razbrav, nema nikakava provizija ?
Ako e navistina e taka se prašuvam od što ke živeat tie banki?
normalno deka naplakaat i pravat profit od sekoj musterija ama ne naplakaat za transferite, toa kazav. zavisno od kakov biznis imas, kolku pari, dali ti treba takov servis ova e ili idealno za tebe ili ne e. ona sto e bitno e deka so relativno mali trosoci i pomali biznisi sega ke imaat opcija kako da sokrijat del od zarabotkata i da izbegnat danoci ako resat toa. ova dopolnitelno ke doprinese za dedolarizacijata sto ja diskutirame. se pomalku ke imas stedenje i vlozuvanje vo zapadni valuti. duri i tie sto sakaat "zapadna" sigurnost moze da ja dobijat preku da kazeme singapurskiot dolar na primer. HSBC global ima kapitalizacija od nad 3 triljoni pa sega vidi... germanskiot budzet za sporedba e 480 miljardi, 6,5 pati pomal.Dobro, sepak naplatuvaat.
Taa banka e poznata da ne rečam ozloglasena vo svetot na finansii, no premnogu e golema za da se obide nekoj nešto da i našteti i da gi navedee tie luge da gi počituvaat pravilata.
Не е само со затворање на финансискиот пазар, туку и со тарифите кои ги најавува Трамп, може да се случи права дедоларизација, затоа што САД ќе го затворат нивниот пазар.Da, OK sega razbiram, naplakaat indirektno.
Teško ddeka toa nešto ke pridonese za dedolarizacijata, koja site ovde ja očekvuame i posakuvame. Čitav nešto od Štiglic i Pretis, tretiott go zaboraviv, oni velat deka vistitnska dedolarizacija ke se sluči koga amerika ke reši da go zatvori svojot finansijski pazar, zato što poveke ne im odgovara. Golemiot dolg koi go imaat e posledica i od dolarizacijata, stranci im gi kupuvaat državnite obvrznici zato što davaat golema kamata i manipuliraat so niv, itn se javuvaat goolemi deficiti i debalansi vo celata ekonomija, se gubat rabotni mesta zaradi deindustrijalizacijaza, itn, ne razbrav baš sve, komlikuvano e toa.
No ona što ne e dobro za državata, e dobro za wall street, te krupnite bogataši. Ako se zatvori pazarot ili ako se ograniči protokot na pari oni ke zagubat. HSBC e sigurno medju niv. Taka da koga se zboruva za amaerika treba da se ima vo predvid deka postojat poveke stakeholderi, nekoomu nešto odgovara na drugi ne itn.