Calciopoli 2006 - the sports trial which saw Juventus stripped of two titles and sent to Serie B - is not credible according to former referee designator Paolo Bergamo.
The former ref chief claims prosecutors four years ago never took note of his statements when he told them of the contacts he had with clubs and individuals.
Bergamo was at FIGC headquarters when he was questioned by federal prosecutor Stefano Pallazzi over the 2006 proceedings in relation to their own investigation into evidence which is again being used at the current trial in Naples.
"I have the maximum spirit to collaborate, I hope they believe me now seeing as in 2006 no one wanted to listen to me. The truth is that at the time they held a farcical process," Bergamo told Tuttosport.
"I can say with absolute certainty that with the new phone calls which have emerged recently, the theorem that led to the 2006 trial is not credible.
"It's sad to speak about these things four years on. I used to speak with everyone. I have always said that I used to speak with Giacinto Facchetti and Massimo Moratti and I did it because the FIGC wanted me to.
"I used to speak with everyone regarding the draws for referees, and no one proved in Napoli that the draws with fixed.
"As for the dinners... I had dinner with Facchetti first and then [Adriano] Galliani and after with Luciano Moggi and Antonio Giraudo, but only the Juventus guys had their houses surrounded by police."