kpbKENGUR
Devil's Advocate
- Член од
- 25 јануари 2007
- Мислења
- 5.132
- Поени од реакции
- 201
не дека неќат, туку од што се неспособни. неќеле...Е има да, ама не дека не можат да си фатат женска туку нејќат.
Зошто има жени кои паѓаат на „ново печени богаташи!?“
- Креатор на темата The`bItCh
- Време на започнување
Crazy in Love
Here's looking at you kid.
- Член од
- 25 јануари 2007
- Мислења
- 23.859
- Поени од реакции
- 25.413
Затоа што има жени кои сакаат да бидат видени со луѓе кои имаат пари.Сакаат кога ги частат.
Но,не е ова појава кај сите жени.
Секој со својот вкус и амбициите во животот.
Но,не е ова појава кај сите жени.
Секој со својот вкус и амбициите во животот.
- Член од
- 23 декември 2007
- Мислења
- 2.247
- Поени од реакции
- 57
Па оти е новопечен, значи нов и сака некоја да го испроба, а тој шипакот со поклони, со вечери и такви ми ти работи ја заведува. Што ако е стар богаташ, веќе не е интересен.
Dolphin
Pirate of the Caribbean
- Член од
- 3 март 2005
- Мислења
- 1.296
- Поени од реакции
- 57
извини, ама ако сум богат не сум способен да пружам искрена љубов?
- Член од
- 17 март 2005
- Мислења
- 11.493
- Поени од реакции
- 1.585
The Decline of Love
There is a heartbreaking scene in a park in the movie "definitely, maybe" where Sarah (Elizabeth Banks) caresses Will's head affectionately. It epitomizes the love women were born to express, which men and children naturally crave and return.
The gesture is witnessed by their 11-year-old daughter Maya, who like all children longs to live with her natural parents as a family.
But it is not to be. Will (Ryan Reynolds) and Sarah are just finalizing their divorce.
The anger welled up in me. How did we let social engineers working for Illuminati banksters sabotage Love? How did men allow lesbianism disguised as "feminism" to gull and steal their women? Why didn't we realize that "women's rights" is a typical bankster scam. They also pretended to champion workers and other minorities in order to divide and control society.
In order to transform humanity for its own purposes, the financial elite must first destroy the Old Order, i.e. marriage and family. The hidden agenda behind feminism is neutering the sexes by empowering women and thus emasculating men. The goal is to exchange heterosexual norms (marriage, family, fidelity) for homosexual ones (promiscuity.) Then everyone can be controlled by sex.
The strength of "definitely maybe," which came out in February, is that it faithfully presents the Illuminati's new norms. We are now to take female bisexuality and promiscuity for granted. And its OK for parents to tell their children they indulged in both.
Written and directed by Adam Brooks, who wrote "Bridget Jones," the movie is a polished, intelligent, and enjoyable if somewhat superficial affair. A more serious look at what has happened to women is "The Business of Strangers."
One reviewer said "definitely maybe" depicted a young man's dilemma deciding between three young women. For me, it's about women's loss of the ability to love. Will was ready to marry them, but in their current confusion, each one shot him down.
Real women naturally seek love. Love for a woman means sacrificing for husband and children. Femininity is defined by this. Her self-lessness holds marriage and family together.
However, women has brainwashed women to seek power instead of love. Power = penis. Power defines masculinity. Now both sexes are confused about their identity and cannot connect and stay together.
Psychologically, men naturally seek power. Women seek love. Marriage is the exchange of woman's worldly power for man's love and protection. Thus women should empower men and men should use this power for the benefit of wife and family. Of course women also have emotional, moral, intellectual and aesthetic power.
Will is a very handsome & eligible young man. But he has no luck with the ladies. First, he proposed to Sarah in spite of a lesbian affair and another infidelity with a male roommate. He still can't take the hint so she just rebuffs him.
Then Will was about to propose to "Summer" (Rachel Weisz) but she torpedoed that by putting her career before his.
Finally, he declared his love to "April" (Isla Fisher) who rejected him because he was weak at the time.
Later he meets Sarah again; they marry and have Maya. But for some unexplained reason, they are now divorcing. Perhaps it's because Sarah never learned to put one man first (love), and so Will never learned to take responsibility and become a man.
Love is women's work and obsession. It's what makes them tick. If they lose this knack, they are lost and so are we all.
Women's "career" used to be wife and mother. The financial elite brainwashed them to seek career because it didn't want them to have families.
I'm not against women having careers. That's not the point. Women have been betrayed by society. It's not too late to thwart the real enemy. It's not too late for them to put love first again.
by Henry Makow Ph.D. – April 26, 2008
There is a heartbreaking scene in a park in the movie "definitely, maybe" where Sarah (Elizabeth Banks) caresses Will's head affectionately. It epitomizes the love women were born to express, which men and children naturally crave and return.
The gesture is witnessed by their 11-year-old daughter Maya, who like all children longs to live with her natural parents as a family.
But it is not to be. Will (Ryan Reynolds) and Sarah are just finalizing their divorce.
The anger welled up in me. How did we let social engineers working for Illuminati banksters sabotage Love? How did men allow lesbianism disguised as "feminism" to gull and steal their women? Why didn't we realize that "women's rights" is a typical bankster scam. They also pretended to champion workers and other minorities in order to divide and control society.
In order to transform humanity for its own purposes, the financial elite must first destroy the Old Order, i.e. marriage and family. The hidden agenda behind feminism is neutering the sexes by empowering women and thus emasculating men. The goal is to exchange heterosexual norms (marriage, family, fidelity) for homosexual ones (promiscuity.) Then everyone can be controlled by sex.
The strength of "definitely maybe," which came out in February, is that it faithfully presents the Illuminati's new norms. We are now to take female bisexuality and promiscuity for granted. And its OK for parents to tell their children they indulged in both.
Written and directed by Adam Brooks, who wrote "Bridget Jones," the movie is a polished, intelligent, and enjoyable if somewhat superficial affair. A more serious look at what has happened to women is "The Business of Strangers."
WOMEN LOSING THEIR TRUTH?
One reviewer said "definitely maybe" depicted a young man's dilemma deciding between three young women. For me, it's about women's loss of the ability to love. Will was ready to marry them, but in their current confusion, each one shot him down.
Real women naturally seek love. Love for a woman means sacrificing for husband and children. Femininity is defined by this. Her self-lessness holds marriage and family together.
However, women has brainwashed women to seek power instead of love. Power = penis. Power defines masculinity. Now both sexes are confused about their identity and cannot connect and stay together.
Psychologically, men naturally seek power. Women seek love. Marriage is the exchange of woman's worldly power for man's love and protection. Thus women should empower men and men should use this power for the benefit of wife and family. Of course women also have emotional, moral, intellectual and aesthetic power.
Will is a very handsome & eligible young man. But he has no luck with the ladies. First, he proposed to Sarah in spite of a lesbian affair and another infidelity with a male roommate. He still can't take the hint so she just rebuffs him.
Then Will was about to propose to "Summer" (Rachel Weisz) but she torpedoed that by putting her career before his.
Finally, he declared his love to "April" (Isla Fisher) who rejected him because he was weak at the time.
Later he meets Sarah again; they marry and have Maya. But for some unexplained reason, they are now divorcing. Perhaps it's because Sarah never learned to put one man first (love), and so Will never learned to take responsibility and become a man.
Love is women's work and obsession. It's what makes them tick. If they lose this knack, they are lost and so are we all.
CONCLUSION
Women's "career" used to be wife and mother. The financial elite brainwashed them to seek career because it didn't want them to have families.
I'm not against women having careers. That's not the point. Women have been betrayed by society. It's not too late to thwart the real enemy. It's not too late for them to put love first again.
- Член од
- 30 мај 2008
- Мислења
- 185
- Поени од реакции
- 8
LOGIKA: ZENA SE MAZI ZA PARI A MAS SE ZENI ZA UBAVINA
- Член од
- 5 август 2007
- Мислења
- 3.582
- Поени од реакции
- 2.589
Oти новопечените богаташи не знаат како треба со парите,па така полесно им е на жените да му ги исцицаат сите парина што му се в џеб,
а овие да мислат дека така треба,дека така одат тие работи,и не се свесни дека од ко ке му ги исцицаат сите парина,ке си останат со палчето во уста
а овие да мислат дека така треба,дека така одат тие работи,и не се свесни дека од ко ке му ги исцицаат сите парина,ке си останат со палчето во уста
Ј
јовица11
Гостин
Zosto se zponzorusi,a bogami u sekoja dvojka lezi mala doza na lakomost kon parite,taka da koja poveke koja pomalku,ali se lakomat bogami
- Член од
- 13 септември 2007
- Мислења
- 5.785
- Поени од реакции
- 4.028
аман веќе престанете со генерализација и лупање етикети...не секоја девојка се пали на пари....
јас мислам дека девојките што се лепат на пари се провинцијалки и сакаат да избегаат од малите градови...
ама не генерализирам...често ова се случува и затоа така викам.....
јас мислам дека девојките што се лепат на пари се провинцијалки и сакаат да избегаат од малите градови...
ама не генерализирам...често ова се случува и затоа така викам.....
и не...не секоја девојка е лакома по пари:helou: тенк ју вери мач
Ј
јовица11
Гостин
Vikas deka provincijalkite se sponzorusi a red podole ne generaliziras,dobro de se popravam 95% se takvi ima i posteni koj ziveat za ljubov
- Член од
- 13 септември 2007
- Мислења
- 5.785
- Поени од реакции
- 4.028
ете ти го болдирав делот на кој треба да обрнеш внимание:helou:Vikas deka provincijalkite se sponzorusi a red podole ne generaliziras,dobro de se popravam 95% se takvi ima i posteni koj ziveat za ljubovНапишано од ^^^магде^^^
аман веќе престанете со генерализација и лупање етикети...не секоја девојка се пали на пари....
јас мислам дека девојките што се лепат на пари се провинцијалки и сакаат да избегаат од малите градови...
ама не генерализирам...често ова се случува и затоа така викам.....
и не...не секоја девојка е лакома по пари:helou: тенк ју вери мач
