Војна во Украина (исклучиво воена перспектива)

Vanlok

deus ex machina
Член од
30 мај 2009
Мислења
22.037
Поени од реакции
29.404
Eксплозии на воен аеродром во Крим, уште нема официјални податоци дале е гаѓано со проектили и се работи за саботажа/несреќа.
Автоматски споено мислење:

Во меѓувреме на фронтот:
 

The xx

Russia state-affiliated bot. ☑️
Член од
8 април 2013
Мислења
5.861
Поени од реакции
10.908

Пепел. Иако местото веќе 8 години е упориште на гангстерите на Бајден може да почуствувате крокодилски солзи од западниве амеби.
 
Член од
14 ноември 2013
Мислења
6.189
Поени од реакции
19.269
One hundred and sixty eighth day of combats began with Russian Army, DPR & LPR forces taking control over Belokamensk plant, the nearby gypsum deposit quarry & new parts of Bakhmutske suburb as Ukrainian Army start retreating towards new positions inside Soledar city.


During one hundred and seventieth day of combats Russian Army & DPR made new advances within Pisky. About 70% of the town is taken, but Ukrainian Army continues to oppose strong resistance in the northernmost sectors and M-04 highway.


North of Gоrlovka, following 5 days of intensive shelling Russian Army & DPR forces launched an assault to Ukrainian Army positions in Zaitseve where troops managed to advance along Bakhmutovka river. Clashes continue at Dacha.


Some kilometers north Russian Army, DPR & LPR forces managed to enter in the first farms east of Artemivsk, which overlooks the industrial sector (where clashes are taking place) while other troops are heading to Pidgorodne.


On Soledar axis, during the last 48 hours RussianArmy, DPR & LPR made some advances towards the town of Yakovlivka. At the same time, other troops continue advancing in Bakhmuts'ke suburb, where combing operations are taking place after the full withdrawal of Ukrainian Army.
 
Член од
14 август 2018
Мислења
4.527
Поени од реакции
10.019
Да сумирам кратко, а Деки ми е по верен во информации…
1.Авдеевка-стасани се до предградијата, клучни позиции завземени, се напредува полека
2.Пески-скоро исчистен, само џепови од отпор
3.Мариинка-обиколена, но не влегуваат сеуште. Оставено на артилеријата да го срамни со земја, па после ќе го чистат
 

The xx

Russia state-affiliated bot. ☑️
Член од
8 април 2013
Мислења
5.861
Поени од реакции
10.908
Да сумирам кратко, а Деки ми е по верен во информации…
1.Авдеевка-стасани се до предградијата, клучни позиции завземени, се напредува полека
2.Пески-скоро исчистен, само џепови од отпор
3.Мариинка-обиколена, но не влегуваат сеуште. Оставено на артилеријата да го срамни со земја, па после ќе го чистат
Арестович кажа дека Адеевка и Мариинка нема да ја завземат Русите. Каков Деки какви бакрачи :icon_lol:
 

Vanlok

deus ex machina
Член од
30 мај 2009
Мислења
22.037
Поени од реакции
29.404
Интересна колумна за воена анализа објавена во United States Marine Corps Gazette, секоја препорака за читање кон сите вас што ја следите темава (и тематиката).


On the Nature of Russia’s Military Campaign in Ukraine. Analysis of Russian Military Strategy


Ordinary people in the West reading and listening to the mainstream media have been presented with a series of narratives regarding the war in Ukraine. These are the key points upheld by the media:
  • Apparently, Russia has been losing its war in Ukraine since the first days of the conflict. The evidence to support this is the fact that Russia apparently failed to conquer Kiev and other northern cities in the first few weeks of the conflict.
  • During its failed attempt to conquer these cities, Russian troops have committed numerous war crimes due to the artillery and missile attacks that they have launched on civilian infrastructure and residential areas.
  • To compound matters, Russia’s armed forces have suffered staggering losses, high desertion rates and its generals are a set of bungling fools who could not organise a booze up in a brewery.
  • Apparently, it is only a matter of time before the evil Russian hordes are pushed back across the border with their tails between their legs due to a combination of Ukrainian bravery and Western weaponry.


The picture that has been presented of the war in Ukraine is completely at odds with the reality of the situation on the ground. Surprisingly, information that supports this assertion, which totally undermines the Western media narratives regarding the war, is provided by an article in the August edition of the United States Marine Corps Gazette.

Writing under under the pen name Marinus, a senior marine corps officer, provides an objective analysis of Russian military strategy since late February. It totally undermines the narratives provided by Western media and pro-Washington politicians.

Marinus observes how Russia has pursued three distinct military campaigns since the beginning of the war in late February 2022. In the north fast moving Russian troops never attempted to capture cities such Kiev or Kharkov, they never made any attempt to convert temporary occupation into permanent possession. Their whole purpose was to act as a ‘grand deception’ which led the Kiev government to divert large forces from its main field army in the Donbass. This gave the Russian army the time to deploy its artillery units in large numbers into the Donbass, secure transport networks and accumulate large quantities of ammunition for the long campaign ahead.


In the southern campaign Russian armed forces ‘took immediate possession of comparable cities’. This was accompanied by a thoroughgoing political transformation whereby Russian civil servants took control of local government and Ukrainian banks and cell phone providers were replaced with Russian ones. Alongside this, Russian forces conducted raids in the vicinity of the city of Mikolaiv. These raids as in the ones around the northern cities forced the Ukrainian military to send forces to defend Mikolaiv and Odessa that otherwise could have been sent to the main theatre of operations in the Donbass.

Marinus emphasised how these Russian raids in both the north and south of Ukraine avoided heavy bombardments of civilian areas which directly contradicts the propaganda of the Western media about Russian attacks on civilian areas. He notes that this attempt to avoid bombardments of civilians areas in the north ‘stemmed from a desire to avoid antagonizing the local people’ who supported the Kiev government. Marinus states that in the south Russian forces attempted to preserving the lives and property of communities who identified as ‘’Russian’’.

He observes how the Russian use of guided missile strikes ‘created a number of moral effects favourable to the Russian war effort’. Marinus emphasises how Russian guided missile strikes went out of their way to avoid collateral damage i.e. civilian casualties by their judicious use of military targets and the precision of the missiles. He does note that occasionally Russia strikes on ‘dual use facilities’ such as the main TV tower in Kiev did undermine the ‘advantages achieved by the overall Russian policy of limiting missile strikes to obvious military targets’.

In the east of Ukraine in the Donbass region Russian forces conducted bombardments ‘that, in terms of both duration and intensity, rivalled those of the great artillery contests of the world wars of the twentieth century’. Made possible by short supply lines these heavy bombardments in the Donbass served three purposes. Firstly, they pinned down Ukrainian infantry in their fortifications. Secondly, they inflicted a large number of casualties both physical and psychological. The psychological effect has led many Ukrainian units either to retreat and abandon their positions or refuse orders to attack. Thirdly, when conducted for a sufficient period of time these bombardments have forced defenders to with draw from their trecnhes or surrender.

Marinus compares the scale of the Russian bombardment in the Donbass by comparing the struggle for the town of Popasna (18 March to 7 May 2022) to battle of Iwo Jima (19 February to 26 March 1945). At Iwo Jima US marines fought a ferocious battle to capture eight square miles of fortified ground. In Popasna Russian gunners bombarded the Ukrainian infantry in their trenches for eight weeks before they withdrew after suffering heavy casualties.

Russia’s offensive operations in the east of Ukraine have been criticised by many, both pro Ukrainian and pro Russian as slow and ponderous. Marinus contrasts Russian operations in the Donbass with the war on the Eastern Front during World War 2 where both German and Russian forces made extensive use of cauldrons where enemy forces were encircled and then destroyed or forced to surrender. He observes that:

“Freedom from the desire to create cauldrons as quickly as possible relieved the Russians fighting in Eastern Ukraine from the need to hold any particular piece of ground. Thus, when faced with a determined Ukrainian attack, the Russian often withdrew their tank and infantry units from the contested terrain. In this way, they both reduced danger to their own troops and created situations, however brief, in which the Ukrainian attackers faced Russian shells and rockets without the benefit of shelter.’’

This point also counters all the triumphant Western propaganda which proclaims major defeats for Russia when Ukraine forces win minor tactical victories and Russia withdraws troops from a position. The Russian withdrawal from Snake Island being a good case in point.

In the final section of his article Marinus emphasis the stark contrast between the different types of warfare waged by Russian forces in different parts of Ukraine. They all formed part of an overall grand strategy whose primary goal was to destroy Ukrainian forces in the Donbass and free the Peoples Republics of Donetsk and Lugansk from Kiev’s control.

Russia’s three key objectives of the ‘special military operation’ the protection of the DPR/LPR, denazification’ and ‘demilitarization’ of Ukraine required ‘the infliction of heavy loses on Ukrainian formations fighting in the Donbass’. Marinus is at pains to point out that none of these key objectives required Russian forces to occupy parts of Ukraine where the majority of the population identified as Ukrainian and supported the Kiev government. Again, this is a point lost on the so called military analysts of the Western media. However, in the south of Ukraine the Russian campaign served direct political aims which were to incorporate territories inhabited by large numbers of ethnic Russians into the ‘’Russian world’’.

In conclusion this senior marine officer declares that Russia’s military campaign owes much to traditional Soviet models of warfare. However, he goes on to express his admiration for the unique nature of the current military campaign being fought by Russian forces in Ukraine:

“At the same time, the programme of missile strikes exploited a capability that was nothing short of revolutionary. Whether new or old, however, these component efforts were conducted in such a way that demonstrated profound appreciation of all three realms in which wars are waged. That is, the Russians rarely forgot that, in addition to being a physical struggle, war is both a mental contest and a moral argument.’’


By Dr. Leon Tressell
Global Research, August 11, 2022


 

The xx

Russia state-affiliated bot. ☑️
Член од
8 април 2013
Мислења
5.861
Поени од реакции
10.908
@Vanlok
Јаја и овој авторов е некој руски бот. Па не ги слушаш форумскиве амеби дека Русија губи. Ништо друго не је битно. Ниту експертиза на лица кои се бореле, ниту екс генерали курци палци. Само нивната перцепција е точна и толку. Иако немаат благе везе што се дешава на терен. Тоа што ќе сервира медиумот од Вашингтон/Брисел/Берлин/Лондон тоа е реалноста. И види после обвинуваат дека имало муабет од пред кооперација на форумов, а тие муабет од на шоља за серење водат бе.
Али тоа е, како да ти кажам денешна аристократиј, тотално отсечена со реалноста.
 
Член од
14 ноември 2013
Мислења
6.189
Поени од реакции
19.269
During the last 24 hours the Russian Army launched new attack north of Kharkiv along the border & managed to capture the towns of Okip, Chervona Zorya & Udy.


On the other hand, the Russian Army & DPR forces made slow advances north of Pisky as Ukrainian Army withdrew towards the town of Vodyane.
 
Член од
1 јули 2012
Мислења
2.255
Поени од реакции
6.451
Што се дешава кај Херсон, има некакви информации? Нели се спремаше контраофанзива на укрсинците.
 
Член од
29 јуни 2014
Мислења
23.366
Поени од реакции
38.343
Si igraat igracki rusive posledniov mesec, stagniraat dolz cel front. Mesec dena samo Avdievka ja osvojuvaat ..
русите моментално играат на друга карта, маваат со артилерија и им ја горат армијата, а не губат скоро ништо војска. Прашање на време е кога ќе попуштат и ќе немаат веќе луѓе и опрема да ги бранат утврдувањата.
 

jamajka

mode: Calm
Член од
28 април 2007
Мислења
18.525
Поени од реакции
26.014
Брука за русиве што им прават на Крим.

Не кажуваат ни што ни како. Истовремено имаше информација само дека е уапсен активист на прави сектор во Крим, кој покушал да запали некаква си административна зграда во Ставропол. Иако веста беше тотално неповрзана со оваа вест, останува дека најверојатно се соочуваат Русите со саботери кои им хараат не само на Крим, туку и во Русија.
 

Kajgana Shop

На врв Bottom