jas mislam deka se teroristite bidejki nema dovolno dokazi kako i nemame osnov da mislime deka stanuva zbor za eksplozivi...eve edno video za wtc7 koja se zapali od t.n debriss od north tower
ов не ви го кажаа
ostavi gi niv gajle mi e za niv,tie pokazaa nesposobnost i neazurnost i pokraj predupreduvanjata.(od rusija,francija)
sega ke ti kazam zosto znaci 7micata se zapali od zapalen del od severnata kula se gleda toa i preku 10 kata bile zapaleni protivpozarniot sistem bil rasipan...ej amerikanskite filmovi lazat amerika ne e sovrsena.
ponatamu za kulite nema nitu eden AMA BAREM EDEN DOKAZ deka e postaven eksploziv a nema nitu ostatoci od eksploziv ako 7micata bese urnata od eksploziv zosto gorese dooolgo vreme go vide cadot,ponatamu postavuvanje eksploziv na zgradi isklucitelno vazni koi imaat obezbeduvanje,redovni kontroli a i samata operacija e neizvodliva,koj eksploziv,od kade,kaj e postaven.(bez nikoj da zabelezi,bez ostatoci od reakcijata-eksplozija e prvenstveno hemiska reakcija)
a zosto ova ne go kazaa konsperativcite(eve gi lagite na 911truth)
и ова
znaci ne e potvrdena na nitu edna od prethodnite zgradi metalna konstrukcija i gubenje strukturalen integritet isto taka prasanje nemase pancace efekt(vidi na 3:16 i 3:17 da go vidis toj pancace effect...kaj 4:24 primeti kolku gas e osloboden!!(a 7micata gorese 9 casa kako mozes da sporedis zgrada koja gorela so demolirana zgrada ETE TOA E NAIVNOST!!!!!!)
kaj 5:13 taa zgrada e od celicna konstrukcija i vidovte kako padna....zosto ne padna za 7 sekundi...zosto drugite ne padnaa za 7 sekundi(Autodesk maya i 3Dmax hahah)
kaj 5:46 gledate kako sami se utnuvaat go vidovte efektot od eksplozija-kako sto rekov od noseckite stolbovi pa nagore kon vrvot(dva oblaka od eksplozivna reakcija
SAMO SUMNJAM OTI NEMA ZVUK DA JA CUEME EKSPLOZIJATA AKO GOVORAT VISTINA GO IMAME TOA PRAVO TAKA) i mnoguuu otpad rasfrlan-ne bese taka kaj kulite!!!(zgradata kaj 6:06 ne e za sporedba)
videte go kolapsot na kulite 7:50 7:55...kade e oblakot od gas DOLU??????toa ukazuva deka nemalo eksploziv a gore...pa boingot
isto i kaj 8:11
SAMO KRITICKI OSVRT
koga sme kaj konspirativci videte pa komentirajte
tuka e UAV
a ovde RAKETA
koe e sega vistina...raketa,laseri,eksplozivi bla bla bla
nekoj profitira od ovie teorii...ima narod kupuvaat knigi doniraat pari(a tie odat kaj istite banki vrz koi plukaat konspirativcite....
e sega ocekuvam odgovor na prasanjata boldirani bez videa ke ve molam:smir:
сега експлозиви ги срушија или ласер или пак ракрта јас верувам дека е ракета иако нема доказ очигледно авион удри
и чисто ме интересира ова баш
кој барал одговори ке ги добие инаку имате порција сирење и ви велат торта е и вие веривате
I don't know where to start: this video is a complete lie.
First off, the video is full of misinformation about Horus. He was baptized? Oh really! I would love to see a source for that!
Most of the supposed parallels are completely untrue!
Actually, Muslim apologists have been trying to do this for centuries--to say that Christianity is really just another form of paganism. But that's a lie.
Most of the information in this video seems to come from Acharya S's book, The Christ Conspiracy (1999), which is a sensationalist book which has zero academic credibility. If you want to learn about Horus you can
рead the ancient myths about him--
Egyptian Mythology: Horus
Encyclopedia Mythica: Horus
The Eye Of Horus
Tektonics: Horus, Isis, Osirisr
Let's go over just some of the data:
1.
Horus was not born of a Virgin--that's a lie.
2. Horus was not baptized. That's a complete fabrication. "Anup the Baptizer"?--show me where you find that! That's a lie.
3. Horus never walked on water. He performed miracles, but raising the dead and walking on water were not among them. Nor did he cast out demons.
4. Horus had disciples--but you can't show me a single reference to his having twelve. That's a lie.
5. Horus never taught in the temple at age 12. That's a lie. Read the accounts above--it's not there.
6. Where was ever said that was Horus crucified? That's a lie! He died in a later version of the story and was brought back to life--but Jesus' "resurrection" was more than a mere coming back to life. His body was transformed and changed. Anyways, it was only later added to the Horus legend.
That's just off the top of my head. That should give you some indication though about the reliability of this film. In short, its claims are lies that are told to sell books. But no scholar in the world would accept this stuff--only the ignorant. Anybody can get a book published or a video made and say whatever they want. That doesn't make it true.
Moreover, to think that Jesus didn't exist is absolutely, positively unfounded, unhistorical, and unrealistic.
Those who opposed Chrstianity from the very beginning never asserted that Jesus didn't exist--
in fact, they made all kinds of slanderous claims against Jesus. But they never asserted he was a myth.
In fact, there's more evidence Jesus existed than virtually any one else in antiquity.
... And there isn't a single respectable scholar today--Christian or secular--who would make such a claim. Only those who haven't studied the issue seriously could say such a thing.
Hope that helps...
***UPDATE***
I just want to add a few things here to address some of the comments made below.
For example, when John Allegro attempted to publish a translation of the Dead Sea Scrolls, fourteen Oxford scholars wrote to the publisher and demanded it be pulled--it was an absolutely inaccurate translation! The book was pulled and the publisher even apologized! A critique was written by John Strugnell, which meticulously revealed in a line-by-line treatment the errors and which was longer than Allegro's book itself! [See "Notes en marge du volume V des 'Discoveries in the Judaean Desert of Jordon'" in Revue de Qumran 7 (1963): 163-76. For more on the debacle see, James VanderKam and Peter Flint, The Meaning of the Dead See Scrolls (San Francisco: HaperCollins, 2002), 381-403.]
The fact is, no scholar takes Allegro's work seriously. You will only see his name mentioned in academic journals such as the Journal for the Historical Jesus (not a particularly conservative journal!) in articles listing the most outrageous examples of poor scholarship.
Of course, you won't find scholars quoting from S's book either.
Again, read the ancient sources themselves and see what they say about Horus--he was not baptized, crucified, etc. It may sell movies and it may appeal to those who already want to dismiss Christianity, but the Jesus-Horus comparison has really no academic value whatsoever
Information of the average person on the Internet is like this. Someone hands you a piece of cheese and calls it cake. One person says it isn't cake and another insults you for it. Then that someone comes up with a well thought out plot as to why he thinks its cake and that words are meaningless. How did we come up with the word cheese instead of cake? Therefore he has all rights to call it cake. One person sees the point and spreads the idea saying how fantastic and wonderful it is. It spreads like wildfire and people are now calling cheese "cake". When in fact it is still a fucking block of cheese.
Now immediately I noticed the problem with Zeitgeist was the fact that the maker of this
"documentary" has the religious knowledge of a poodle. He took many religious figures and gave them basic parables to Jesus Christ despite the fact the most of those aren't looked in depth or are just grossly inaccurate.
Take for example Jesus's Birthday. If you have common knowledge you will now that Jesus's birthday was set on December 25th to replace that of Bacchus. Jesus's birthday was not, in fact, on December 25th. Yet, he states throughout the film that his Birthday IS on December 25th. When in fact it says in the Bible that there were "shepherds in the field". This would indicate that Jesus was most likely born during the spring as well all should know that in that period Sheep did not graze in the winter.
Another example is the God Horus. Horus's story is pretty much inaccurate to hell other than the fact that he died and came to life again. You should all know that, in fact, there are many religious figures out there who have died and come back to life. Jesus wasn't the one who started the trend. Horus's story, if you ask any college professor or do...I dunno...basic Internet fact checking is not like he had said. Horus's mother was not a virgin as she had sex with a disembodied penis from Hours's father. He was never crucified. He had followers, but they were never called Disciples nor were there a specific numbers. It never really said he was born on December 25th.
Still you could look for basic rock hard parables to many religious figures, but if you look down at the stories and how detailed and different they are you learn that each one of them are unique in their own way and in others are not alike at all.
The movie rambles on about this while people soak it up like a sponge.
кажав што имав без чарли шин и мислам дека читателите ке пресудат:smir: