Падот на империјата

Член од
13 јули 2006
Мислења
15.178
Поени од реакции
17.990
Ептен се сврти ти а?
Абе јас сум поддржувач на Берни, шо има инаку да сакаш кај демократите.

Демократската партија единствено што работеше беше да и овоможи на банкарската олигархија што подобри закони, а притоа користејќи ги правата на ранливите малцинства како параван.

Целосно ги напушти работниците.

Демократите се главните виновници за тоа што САД дојде до ова дереџе.
 
Член од
23 ноември 2011
Мислења
14.322
Поени од реакции
32.862
Абе јас сум поддржувач на Берни, шо има инаку да сакаш кај демократите.

Демократската партија единствено што работеше беше да и овоможи на банкарската олигархија што подобри закони, а притоа користејќи ги правата на ранливите малцинства како параван.

Целосно ги напушти работниците.

Демократите се главните виновници за тоа што САД дојде до ова дереџе.
Билионерите во САД од кризата станале уште побогати, топ не ги бие, ништо не може да ги сруши, во време на најголема економска криза во САД, со бројки на невработени како што немало ни во крахот од 1929, ама битно системот е ОК и не треба да се менува.

Не, империјата нема да падне, не наскоро, и не особено од надворешни удари од Русија и Кина, империјата на крај ќе изгние одвнатре.
 

jamajka

mode: Calm
Член од
28 април 2007
Мислења
18.576
Поени од реакции
26.098
Билионерите во САД од кризата станале уште побогати, топ не ги бие, ништо не може да ги сруши, во време на најголема економска криза во САД, со бројки на невработени како што немало ни во крахот од 1929, ама битно системот е ОК и не треба да се менува.

Не, империјата нема да падне, не наскоро, и не особено од надворешни удари од Русија и Кина, империјата на крај ќе изгние одвнатре.
Сите империи гнијат од внатре, ама црвот се пушта однадвор...

Интересна работа е како и ти и Тенеке одеднаш станавте против САД и нивниот систем. До пред некое време цврсто го браневте тој систем... Некако и трансформацијата се случува во екот на блм и антифа движењето кога и мејстрим медиумите (попут CNN медиумите) прават целосна реконсидериација на Американската историја и нејзините историски ликови кои до вчера беа неприкосновени... Што е тоа ако не смена на системот... Да се буткаат споменици од историски личности кои ја изградиле таа држава... Тоа што сега се случува во САД најблилку може да се долови ако се нарече црн Апартхејт.
Автоматски споено мислење:

Абе јас сум поддржувач на Берни, шо има инаку да сакаш кај демократите.

Демократската партија единствено што работеше беше да и овоможи на банкарската олигархија што подобри закони, а притоа користејќи ги правата на ранливите малцинства како параван.

Целосно ги напушти работниците.

Демократите се главните виновници за тоа што САД дојде до ова дереџе.
Па јас мислам дека Берни заедно со Сорос и некои леви структури сакаат да го срушат системот во САД. Само да знаеш една работа, (зло)употребата на црнците и давајќи им моќ која очигледно е дека ја злоупотребуваат, само ќе навлече гнев на обичниот Американец (вклучително тука и жутите) против црнците... Така да кога збориме за методите на Берни, не се на граница на етичките нормативи, туку се длабоко зацапани не само во неетички, туку и во нехумани води. Начинот на којшто се случува етикетирање и уништувањето на етикетираните луѓе, се гледа дека учител и идол на Берни му е славниот Сталин.
 
Последно уредено:
Член од
16 декември 2009
Мислења
1.317
Поени од реакции
1.159
twitter.com/i/web/status/1279548269845196800
Навистина е загрижувачки ова што се случува во САД.Ова веќе помалку изгледа на опасно безвластие и е опасно по целиот свет ако знаеме дека Америка е нуклеарна сила.Ако се појави некој пијан црнец како командант на некоја стратешка нуклеарна подморница може да го доведе целиот свет во опасност.
Кој тоа управува со сево ова и мислам дека е голема веројатноста сево ова да се отргне од контрола.
 

jamajka

mode: Calm
Член од
28 април 2007
Мислења
18.576
Поени од реакции
26.098
Колку стеротипи имаш не ми се верува :)
А за тоа кој има стереотипи, еве види ја прогресивната левица што направи од Сан Франциско...

Четвртиот дел го земав директно од foxnews

Имам и видеа и слики приватни и од прошлата недела, а и од периодот кога е емитувана емисијата (пред 7-8 месеци), не ги постирам тука од причина што ме замоли да не ги ширам за да не му напраам проблем на човекот, пошто знаеш ретардиве на Берни линчуваат секој кој нема исто мислење со нив, преку нивните социјални медиуми.

Знаечи чисто комуњарски наратив ти е ова „имаш стереотипи“.... Ова не е прогресија на општеството... Ова е ретардација.

EDIT

Треба да провериш кај Вујаклија што значи зборот конзерватизам... Ова што се случува во САД, поготово антифа делот е конзерватизам виден само во времето на Хитлер и Сталин.... Кај и да е ќе почнат и книги да палат.
 
Последно уредено:

Vanlok

deus ex machina
Член од
30 мај 2009
Мислења
22.312
Поени од реакции
29.776

Автоматски споено мислење:

Сега гледам дека е pay to read артикл, еве го целиот текст:

China tests new space capability with hypersonic missile
Launch in August of nuclear-capable rocket that circled the globe took US intelligence by surprise


China tested a nuclear-capable hypersonic missile in August that circled the globe before speeding towards its target, demonstrating an advanced space capability that caught US intelligence by surprise.

Five people familiar with the test said the Chinese military launched a rocket that carried a hypersonic glide vehicle which flew through low-orbit space before cruising down towards its target.

The missile missed its target by about two-dozen miles, according to three people briefed on the intelligence. But two said the test showed that China had made astounding progress on hypersonic weapons and was far more advanced than US officials realised.

The test has raised new questions about why the US often underestimated China’s military modernisation.

“We have no idea how they did this,” said a fourth person.

The US, Russia and China are all developing hypersonic weapons, including glide vehicles that are launched into space on a rocket but orbit the earth under their own momentum. They fly at five times the speed of sound, slower than a ballistic missile. But they do not follow the fixed parabolic trajectory of a ballistic missile and are manoeuvrable, making them harder to track.

Taylor Fravel, an expert on Chinese nuclear weapons policy who was unaware of the test, said a hypersonic glide vehicle armed with a nuclear warhead could help China “negate” US missile defence systems which are designed to destroy incoming ballistic missiles.

“Hypersonic glide vehicles . . . fly at lower trajectories and can manoeuvre in flight, which makes them hard to track and destroy,” said Fravel, a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Fravel added that it would be “destabilising” if China fully developed and deployed such a weapon, but he cautioned that a test did not necessarily mean that Beijing would deploy the capability.

Mounting concern about China’s nuclear capabilities comes as Beijing continues to build up its conventional military forces and engages in increasingly assertive military activity near Taiwan.

Tensions between the US and China have risen as the Biden administration has taken a tough tack on Beijing, which has accused Washington of being overly hostile.

Michael Gallagher, a Republican member of the House armed services committee, said the test should “serve as a call to action”.

“The People’s Liberation Army now has an increasingly credible capability to undermine our missile defences and threaten the American homeland with both conventional and nuclear strikes,” said Gallagher. “Even more disturbing is the fact that American technology has contributed to the PLA’s hypersonic missile program.”

US military officials in recent months have warned about China’s growing nuclear capabilities, particularly after the release of satellite imagery that showed it was building more than 200 intercontinental missile silos. China is not bound by any arms-control deals and has been unwilling to engage the US in talks about its nuclear arsenal and policy.

Recommended
FT Magazine
The return of Mao: a new threat to China’s politics

Last month, Frank Kendall, US air force secretary, hinted that Beijing was developing a new weapon. He said China had made huge advances, including the “potential for global strikes . . . from space”. He declined to provide details, but suggested that China was developing something akin to the “Fractional Orbital Bombardment System” that the USSR deployed for part of the Cold War, before abandoning it.

“If you use that kind of an approach, you don’t have to use a traditional ICBM trajectory. It’s a way to avoid defences and missile warning systems,” said Kendall.

In August, General Glen VanHerck, head of North American Aerospace Defense Command, told a conference that China had “recently demonstrated very advanced hypersonic glide vehicle capabilities”. He warned that the Chinese capability would “provide significant challenges to my Norad capability to provide threat warning and attack assessment”.

Two of the people familiar with the Chinese test said the weapon could, in theory, fly over the South Pole. That would pose a big challenge for the US military because its missiles defence systems are focused on the northern polar route.

Hu Xijin, editor of Global Times, an ultranationalist Chinese state-run media outlet, tweeted that China would improve its nuclear deterrence to “ensure that the US abandons the idea of nuclear blackmail against China”.

The revelation comes as the Biden administration undertakes the Nuclear Posture Review, an analysis of policy and capabilities mandated by Congress that has pitted arms-control advocates against those who believe the US must do more to modernise its nuclear arsenal because of China.

The Pentagon did not comment on the report but expressed concern about China. “We have made clear our concerns about the military capabilities China continues to pursue, capabilities that only increase tensions in the region and beyond,” said John Kirby, spokesperson. “That is one reason why we hold China as our number-one pacing challenge.”

The Chinese embassy declined to comment on the test, but Liu Pengyu, spokesperson, said China always pursued a military policy that was “defensive in nature” and its military development did not target any country.

“We don’t have a global strategy and plans of military operations like the US does. And we are not at all interested in having an arms race with other countries,” Liu said. “In contrast, the US has in recent years been fabricating excuses like ‘the China threat’ to justify its arms expansion and development of hypersonic weapons. This has directly intensified arms race in this category and severely undermined global strategic stability.”

One Asian national security official said the Chinese military conducted the test in August. China generally announces the launch of Long March rockets — the type used to launch the hypersonic glide vehicle into orbit — but it conspicuously concealed the August launch.

The security official, and another Chinese security expert close to the People’s Liberation Army, said the weapon was being developed by the China Academy of Aerospace Aerodynamics. CAAA is a research institute under China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation, the main state-owned firm that makes missile systems and rockets for China’s space programme. Both sources said the hypersonic glide vehicle was launched on a Long March rocket, which is used for the space programme.

The China Academy of Launch Vehicle Technology, which oversees launches, on July 19 said on an official social media account that it had launched a Long March 2C rocket, which it added was the 77th launch of that rocket. On August 24, it announced that it had conducted a 79th flight. But there was no announcement of a 78th launch, which sparked speculation among observers of its space programme about a secret launch. CAAA did not respond to requests for comment.
 
Последно уредено:

Vanlok

deus ex machina
Член од
30 мај 2009
Мислења
22.312
Поени од реакции
29.776







 
Член од
8 февруари 2020
Мислења
4.883
Поени од реакции
7.263
Другиве држави веќе 3-4г ги молат ФЕД да не креваат каматните стапки, ама штом и "змејов" се јави, сеуште е кристално јасно, кој е кој во светот :sakasuste: :cool:


Chinese President Xi Jinping has a request for Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powelldo not raise interest rates. “If major economies slam on the brakes or take a U-turn in their monetary policies, there would be serious negative spillovers. They would present challenges to global economic and financial stability, and developing countries would bear the brunt of it,” Xi said during the virtual Davos meeting.
 

Vanlok

deus ex machina
Член од
30 мај 2009
Мислења
22.312
Поени од реакции
29.776
Не гледам како може да не ги дигнат каматните стапки...

One of the most enduring conceits of the modern era is that the Federal Reserve acts to goose growth and therefore employment while keeping inflation moderate (whatever that means--the definition is adjustable). This conceit is extremely handy as PR cover: the Fed really, really cares about little old us and expanding our ballooning wealth.
Nice, except it doesn't. The Fed's one real job is defending the U.S. dollar, which is the foundation of America's global hegemony a.k.a. The Empire.
One thing and one thing alone enables global dominance: being able to create "money" out of thin air and use that "money" to buy real stuff in the real world. The nations that can create "money" out of thin air and trade it for magnesium, oil, semiconductors, etc. have an unbeatable advantage over nations that must actually mine gold or make something of equal value to trade for essentials.

The trick is to maintain global confidence in one's currency. There is no one way to manage this, as confidence in a herd animal such as human beings is always contingent. Once the herd gets skittish, all bets are off.
И после ова:
But now it's time to suck in global capital by raising rates, and let nature cull the herd. The number of pundits announcing that the Fed will never raise rates, that the Fed can't raise rates because the precious Billionaire's Bubble would burst and the Fed would never, ever, ever let its precious Billionaire's Bubble burst, is legion. But they're wrong, alas, for thr Fed's job isn't to enrich billionaires, it's to maintain the confidence of the herd in the USD.
The precious Billionaire's Bubble is already bursting, and all those profiting from the bubble expanding are pawing the ground nervously, afraid of being picked off by lurking predators.
Choose one, but only one: you can't defend the Billionaire Bubble and the USD / Empire. Come on, it's not that difficult a decision, is it? What matters more, maintaining global hegemony or phantom wealth?
The Empire is striking back, protecting what really counts, and the Billionaire Bubble sideshow is folding its tents. Best to take your prizes home before it rains.
 

Vanlok

deus ex machina
Член од
30 мај 2009
Мислења
22.312
Поени од реакции
29.776

Writing for military magazine Task and Purpose, retired Marine Corps Lt. Gen. Greg Newbold argued that critical race theory and related ideologies run counter to the “stone-cold pragmatism” needed to win conflicts.

Wars must be waged only with stone-cold pragmatism, not idealism, and fought only when critical national interests are at stake,” he wrote. “Hopes for changing cultures to fit our model are both elitist and naive. The failures of our campaigns in Iraq and especially in Afghanistan confirm this.”

Meanwhile, the tenets of critical race theory—an offshoot of the Marxist critical theory school—can ruin unit cohesion, he added.

“A military force’s greatest strengths are cohesion and discipline,” said Newbold, who retired in 2002. “Individuality or group identity is corrosive and a centrifugal force. Indeed, the military wears uniforms because uniformity is essential.”





Автоматски споено мислење:


Twenty twenty-one was another banner year for the military-industrial complex, as Congress signed off on a near-record $778 billion in spending for the Pentagon and related work on nuclear warheads at the Department of Energy. That was $25 billion more than the Pentagon had even asked for.
It can’t be emphasized enough just how many taxpayer dollars are now being showered on the Pentagon.
 
Последно уредено:

Kajgana Shop

На врв Bottom