bucio
Урбан индијанец.
- Член од
- 8 јули 2008
- Мислења
- 16.330
- Поени од реакции
- 7.799
Why vaccines spread disease; an in-depth analysis of flawed vaccination science
Tuesday, April 08, 2014 by: Ethan A. Huff, staff writer
Tags: vaccine myths, pertussis, whooping cough
(NaturalNews) Infectious diseases that the system insists have been mostly eradicated due to the advent of vaccines are starting to reemerge, with much of the blame for this being levied on the unvaccinated, who are automatically assumed to be the culprits. But a deeper look into the history of vaccines, how they work and what level of long-term protection they truly provide reveals that these golden calves of modern medicine are actually the vehicles through which infectious disease is being spread, with vaccinated individuals as the primary disease carriers.
It is the opposite of what we have all been told for decades about the nature of vaccines -- that they produce immunity to diseases that might otherwise kill you, is one common claim, as is the assumption that refusing vaccines leaves one prone to both catching and spreading otherwise uncommon infectious diseases. These and other modern medical myths about vaccines pervade mainstream thinking, and yet they have absolutely no basis in sound science.
In an extensive rebuttal to a 2012 article written by Forbes' Steven Salzberg that blamed a whooping cough outbreak in the Northwest on unvaccinated children, Dr. Paul G. King, Ph.D., of FAME Systems deconstructs the popular misconception that infectious disease reemergence is the result of people not getting vaccinated. On the contrary, it is the vaccination schedule itself, which the federal government has been coercing people into complying with for nearly the entire last century, that is ultimately leading to and driving these outbreaks.
"Salsberg is simply using a longstanding 'straw man' created long ago by his fellow vaccine apologists to divert the public's attention from the reality that... the current pertussis vaccines are neither effective in providing those inoculated with them long-term protection from contracting whooping cough nor... cost effective," explains Dr. King in his paper...
http://www.naturalnews.com/044636_vaccine_myths_pertussis_whooping_cough.html
Tuesday, April 08, 2014 by: Ethan A. Huff, staff writer
Tags: vaccine myths, pertussis, whooping cough
It is the opposite of what we have all been told for decades about the nature of vaccines -- that they produce immunity to diseases that might otherwise kill you, is one common claim, as is the assumption that refusing vaccines leaves one prone to both catching and spreading otherwise uncommon infectious diseases. These and other modern medical myths about vaccines pervade mainstream thinking, and yet they have absolutely no basis in sound science.
In an extensive rebuttal to a 2012 article written by Forbes' Steven Salzberg that blamed a whooping cough outbreak in the Northwest on unvaccinated children, Dr. Paul G. King, Ph.D., of FAME Systems deconstructs the popular misconception that infectious disease reemergence is the result of people not getting vaccinated. On the contrary, it is the vaccination schedule itself, which the federal government has been coercing people into complying with for nearly the entire last century, that is ultimately leading to and driving these outbreaks.
"Salsberg is simply using a longstanding 'straw man' created long ago by his fellow vaccine apologists to divert the public's attention from the reality that... the current pertussis vaccines are neither effective in providing those inoculated with them long-term protection from contracting whooping cough nor... cost effective," explains Dr. King in his paper...
http://www.naturalnews.com/044636_vaccine_myths_pertussis_whooping_cough.html
Не сакав да кажам но кога веќе ме приморавте морав иако не сакам.Има многу вакви случаи кои како мојов се кријат како змија нозе па де од раѓање било па де воа ноа итн. Затоа не треба да се верува во се што се пласира во јавноста
. 
