- Член од
- 3 септември 2010
- Мислења
- 6.498
- Поени од реакции
- 9.180
Си пронашол уште еден smooth-brained како што си ти и еве колку е тој релевантен. Toj го познава Исламот исто толку колку што Јеховин Сведок го познава Христијанството. Не знам дали знаеш и дека е Вахабист и дека му е изречена фатва oд страна на исламските старешини?Пак лажно ме клеветиш.
Saudi Preacher Bandar Al-Khaybari Demonstrates: The Earth Does Not Revolve around Itself
Sunni Muslims demand ban of Zakir Naik's talk
Why do Muslims hate Dr Zakir Naik?
Islamic Seminary Darul Uloom Issues Fatwa against Zakir
Those of us who study apologetics consider Zakir Naik’s arguments to be hopelessly flawed, illogical, and grounded in silly assumptions. Interestingly, many Muslim scholars also reject Naik’s claims, albeit for different reasons. Darul Uloom Seminary (the Indian equivalent of Al-Azhar) has gone so far as to issue a fatwa condemning Naik as “unreliable.”
Hindustan Times–Darul Uloom, the globally influential Islamic seminary has slammed the religious views of controversial televangelist Dr Zakir Naik in a fatwa as doubtful, urging Muslims to avoid following him. The fatwa came in response to queries from people seeking clarifications on Naik’s teachings since Sunni Muslims either turn to Egypt’s Al-Azhar University or India’s Darul Uloom for guidance.
Although Naik, a doctor turned preacher, has gained prominence as a speaker on Islam, he has been a controversial figure because of his disparaging remarks on other religions and radical views.
The fatwa said Naik was a ghiar muqallidin, a term used to describe those whose teachings are not directly based on any one of the four accepted schools of Islamic thought and, was therefore, unreliable.
http://www.deoband.net/uploads/2/1/0/4/2104435/fatwa_about_dr_zakir_naik.pdf
Разбра нешто од ова со твојата празна глава или тешко?
Последно уредено:
