F
fantomX
Гостин
Tell us, Mr Wenger...
Да, и тимот на Челзи е стар... :pos2:Нема некоја логика, само mind games
Има шанса да се заеби пошто Платини сака да го заеби. Многу едноставно.
Да не беше точно то дека на Платини му смета финансирање на Абрамович, но не од Кралот и од Каталонија...ќе беше и сешно и жалосно, во истовреме.
Првенството не е пролив, туку е најквалитетно. Пошто двете шпански држави зедоа се што можеа и не можеа да земат од играч.
--- надополнето ---
In Platini's world of budget-balancing mediocrity, Abramovich would bank his fortune, Chelsea could never spend big in a daring attempt to draw level with Manchester United, and no small clubs would benefit from the trickle down.
Yet, as long as the transfer money is not set against the club as a loan, what is the problem?
Everyone cites Leeds United and Portsmouth, but those clubs spent money they did not have and could not pay it back. If Abramovich chooses to give his football club £75m to buy players, how is that wrong?
When Manchester City first tried to prise Kaka from AC Milan in a deal worth £100m two years ago, a familiar cry was to think of the hospitals that could be built with this money; and then Kaka didn't come, but we are still waiting for the hospitals.
Why? Because the events were unrelated.
Коментар под колумната:
Once again, the erudite Martin Samuel gets it absolutely right. The so called fair play rule will merely maintain the staus-quo of the big clubs with big stadia--Barca, Real Madrid, Man Utd, and Bayern will retain their status with little hope of challenge from "smaller clubs" who depend on investment from benefactors.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1352649/Martin-Samuel-Fair-play-Roman-75m-reaches-needy.html
:raz:
