Ме мрзи да преведувам ама 
овде можете да најдете што ве интересира за speed of light а конкретно за темава еве го текстот
Technical impossibility of travel faster than the speed of light
 To understand why an object cannot travel faster than light, it is useful to  understand the concept of 
spacetime. 
Spacetime is an extension of the concept  of three-dimensional space to a form of four-dimensional space-time. Having the  classical concepts of height, width, and depth as the first three dimensions,  the new, fourth dimension is that of time. Graphically it can be imagined as a  series of static,three-dimensional 'bubbles', positioned along an arbitrarily  chosen line, each bubble representing a separate position along one of the four  dimensions. That graphical approach is analogous to using a sequence of  two-dimensional cross-sections taken at some standard interval along the third  dimension to represent a three-dimensional object on a two-dimensional surface.  (Imagine a map of a multi-story building that is created by giving the floor  plan for each story of the building on a new page.) The mapping of space and  time can be rotated so that, e.g., the x dimension is replaced by the t  dimension, and each "bubble" represents a cross-section taken along the x  dimension. Supposing that travel is occurring along the y and or the z  dimension, what one will observe is that change along the t dimension will  decrease from "bubble" to "bubble" as change across the y-z plane increases from  "bubble" to "bubble."
 With this understood, there is a clear implication that an object has a total  velocity through space-time at any instant, and for all particles of matter this  velocity is equal to the speed of light. While this result may seem  contradictory to the idea of speed-of-light travel being impossible, it in fact  proves it, taking into account the fact that faster-than-light travel was a  spatial, or three-dimensional concept, not a four-dimensional concept. In the  case of four-dimensions, all of the total velocity of an object not accounted  for in three-dimensional space is in the fourth dimension, or time. To go back  to our bubble picture, if an object is remaining at the same x, y, z positions  it will make maximum progress in the t dimension. And that is just to say that  any clock associated with whatever we are watching at x, y, z is ticking away at  its maximum rate according to a static observer in the same frame of reference,  e.g., somebody at x+3, y+4, z+5 or any other position that is not changing with  respect to x, y, and z. But the greater the changes of x, y, and z according to  the clock of the other observer, the smaller will be the changes in t. But using  the Pythagorean theorem to calculate the distances between a point at x,y,z,t  and some later point x', y', z', t', then those distances will always be the  same.
 While this may seem confusing, it shows that as displacement through space  increases, measured time will decrease to maintain the overall space-time  velocity. If this is the case, it makes speed-of-light travel impossible, since  when as an object approaches the speed of light spacially, it will have to  approach zero velocity temporally. Another implication is that an object might  be said to travel through four-dimensional space-time at the speed of light, but  only in cases wherein its velocity through space is zero. That statement is just  a counter-intuitive way of expressing the idea that when one is motionless  (according to another observer) one's clock is ticking away most rapidly, and  that as one moves faster and faster (according to the other observer) one's  clock is ticking at slower and slower rates that approach zero.