Дали во тој "документ" пишува за некакво присуство на народи кои се нарекуваат Словени? Дали зборувале словенски, дали пишувале словенски?
Која теракота, или слика, или мозаик, или што ти ја знам, артефакт, коа зборувате за археологија веќе, содржи словенски натписи. Нели Александар Словен, и таква моќна империја, да нема засебен јазик и култура и ПИСМО. Да не испадне дека Аце ширел Хеленизам...
За оние кои претставуваат теза дека Словените биле од секогаш тука: "Деца, не се мачете, ви се смеј светот, научната јавност ќе ве погази, смиретесе, остајте спорови со имиња и со такви глупости, гледајте реалност како што се гледа... Историските документи и записи, се во толкав број, што толку нема ни претставници на истата таа теза..."
Не си играјте дрн дупка.
Лоша интерпретација на средновековната терминологија.
За истото пишува и Курта (
http://www.clas.ufl.edu/users/fcurta/ ) во неговата книга
“Создавањето на Словените“ за која и го добива највисокото
признание во 2003.
Фактот дека “Словените“ не оставиле ниту една крепост, никакво утврдување, тврдина, голем град, поход, освојување, укажува на недостигот од кохезија во нивното прикажување како еднороден субјект.
Origin of the South Slavic Peoples: Little is known about the Slavs before the 5th century AD. Their history prior to this can only be tentatively hypothesized (привремено претпоставувани) via archeological and linguistic studies. Much of what we know about their history after the 500s is from the works of
Byzantine historians.
Genetics: Although referred to as 'Slavs' and speaking a
Slavic language,
modern South Slavic peoples 'genetic roots' actually stem from a wide variety of genetic backgrounds, attesting the complexity of the ethno-genetic processes in
Eastern Europe,
namely the symbiosis of ancient, native Balkan populations with that of the 6th century Slavs. A recent genetic study researched several Slavic populations with the aim of localizing the
Proto-Slavic homeland. A significant finding of this study is that
two genetically distinct groups of Slavic populations exist. The first group encompassed most Slavic populations
except most Southern Slavs. According to the authors, most Slavs share a high frequency of
Haplogroup R1a. Its origin is purported to trace to the middle
Dnieper basin of
Ukraine from
Ukrainian LGM refuge 15 kya.
The second group comprises most southern Slavic populations: Bulgarians, most of the Croats, Bosniaks, Macedonians and Serbs, who have a significantly lower frequency of R1a (~15%).
According to the authors, this phenomenon is explained by "...contribution to the Y chromosomes of peoples who settled in the Balkan region before the Slavic expansion to the genetic heritage of Southern Slavs..."
Also the mitochondrial gene pools of the Slavonic ethnic groups proved to preserve features suggesting
a common ancestor for these and South European populations (especially those of the Balkan Peninsula). Finally the
testing results suggest a common ancestry of all Balkan populations, with a
lack of correlation between genetic differentiation and language or ethnicity, stressing that no major migration barriers have existed in the making of the complex Balkan human puzzle.
The genetic homogeneity among Balkanian populations suggests either a most recent
common ancestor of all southeastern European populations or strong gene flow between them, which eliminated any initial differences.
Бараш докази:
The
Vinča culture was an early culture of the Balkans (between the
6th and the
3rd millennium BC), stretching around the course of the
Danube in
Serbia,
Croatia,
Romania,
Bulgaria,
Montenegro and the
Republic of Macedonia,
although traces of it can be found all around the Balkans, parts of Central Europe and Asia Minor.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vinča_culture
Винча азбука:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vinča_signs
Таква империја немала засебно писмо...култура...велиш, па добро би било да погледнеш и други примери:
"The name of Slavinia reached from the Danube to Peloponnesos, leaving to the Empire only islands and detached points of coast from Venice round to Thessalonica. Their settlements in these regions gave a new meaning to an ancient name, and the word Macedonian now began to mean Slavonic."
http://books.google.com/books?pg=PA...Macedonian immigrants date:1600-1890&f=false
А пази сега што велат изворите од ДРУГАТА СТРАНА НА ДУНАВ:
The Hungarian military commanders returned to Arpadian (280) and sent emissaries to
receive permission to go to Greece in order to subjugate
all of Macedonia, from the Danube to the Black Sea (281).
(281) At the
end of the 12th century
in Hungary,
Macedonia referred to the territory from the Danube to the Black Sea.
Anonymi (P. Magistri) Gesta Hungarorum, Scriptores rerum Hungaricarum tempore ducem regumque stirpis Arpadinae Gestarum. Vol. I (Edendo operi praefuit E. Szentpetery) Budapestini 1937, p. 91, 92.
Секоја империја си имала свој административен јазик, а тоа во никој случај не го исклучува јазикот на поединечните етно-културни и лингвистички групи во рамките на таа империја.
Aramaic is thought to have first appeared among the Aramaeans about the late 11th century bc.
By the 8th century bc it had become accepted by the Assyrians as a second language. The mass deportations of people by the Assyrians and the use of
Aramaic as a lingua franca by Babylonian merchants served to spread the language, so that in the 7th and 6th centuries bc it gradually supplanted Akkadian
as the lingua franca of the Middle East. It subsequently became the official language of the Achaemenian Persian dynasty (559–330 bc),
though after the conquests of Alexander the Great, [Koine] displaced it as the official language throughout the former Persian empire.
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/...amaic-language
History of Aramaic
Aramaic is the ancient language of the Semitic family group, which includes the Assyrians, Babylonians, Chaldeans, Arameans, Hebrews, and Arabs. In fact, a large part of the Hebrew and Arabic languages is borrowed from Aramaic, including the Alphabet.
The modern Hebrew (square) script is called "Ashuri", "Ashuri" is the Hebrew name for Assyrian, the name being used to signify the ancestor of the Assyrians, Ashur the son of Shem, the son of Noah (Genesis 10:22). Aramaic is quoted in the very first book of the Bible, Berisheth (Genesis) in Chapter 31:47. In fact, many portions of the
Old Testament are penned originally in Aramaic, including Daniel chapter 2:4 thru chapter 7.
The first known inscriptions of Aramaic date to the late tenth or early
ninth century B.C. In a phenomenal wave of expansion, Aramaic spread over Palestine and Syria and large tracts of Asia and Egypt,
replacing many languages, including Akkadian and Hebrew. For about one thousand years it served as the official and written language of the Near East, officially beginning with the conquests of the Assyrian Empire,
which had adopted Aramaic as its official language, replacing Akkadian.
During the later Chaldean (Neo-Babylonian) and Persian conquests, Aramaic had become the international medium of exchange.
[...]
http://www.peshitta.org/initial/aramaic.html
Така да, од денешна перспектива, не верувам дека некој ќе го негира постоењето на Вавилонците, Асиријците, Арамејците, Арапите или Евреите.
Застапници на одредена теза, треба да се спонзорираат (финансираат) по рецептот на Грците.
Се дотогаш, додека Македонија не биде доволно “богата“ да издвојува средства за спонзорирање на свои застапници, дотогаш ќе преовладуваат познатите пропаганди.
Доволно голем проблем им создаваат и моменталниве ентузијасти и почитувачи на науката, кои објективно се единствените кои им се противставуваат на овие пропагандни машинерии.
