И понатаму, да додемистифицираме:
Religion: Relationship of human beings to God or the Gods or to whatever they consider sacred or, in some cases, merely supernatural." — Britannica Concise Encyclopedia
Mut’ah—Islam's Law of Desire
Muhammad's statements in the hadiths express extreme ambivalence about women (Walther):
"I have left behind no temptation more harmful to my community than that which women represent for men."
"The whole world is delightful, but the most delightful thing in it, is a virtuous woman."
"If a man and a woman are alone in one place, the third person present is the devil (shai’tan)."
"I stood at the gates of Paradise, most of those who entered there were poor, I stood at the gates of Hell, most of those who went in there, were women".
If the veil is to protect women, then
Mut’ah (temporary marriage in Islam) has surprisingly many contradictions. In Iran, fleeting 'temporary marriages' are endorsed by the clergy. One particular respect, in which Shia'ite and Sunni branches of Islam differ, which is in the institution of temporary marriage:
"A major difference in both the customs is that the Shia’ites practice of Mut’ah, or temporary marriage is an ingenious expedient created to resolve the tensions of momentary lusts without resorting to either dishonor or have sexual repressions. Mut'ah may last only for a few hours, but it legitimizes any offspring from this union. Sunnis disavow such a concept, even though their treatment of women is considerably less generous than that of the Shia’ites when it comes to family inheritance and participation in religious rituals" (Occhiogrosso).
These are marriages in the name only; they are not least bound to Muslim men, because they have the right to deny their responsibilities in case any child is born of this temporary liaison… This controversial law allows Muslim men to fornicate, so long as they register their intentions with a religious Shari’ah court, where they fill out a form specifying how long they intend to 'enjoy' their partner/partners. Dr. Mahran Doltchahi, a professor at the Free University in Tehran, comments: "
The enjoyment of marriage is nothing but a legal cover for prostitution. How can anyone in the world claim that a marriage for 10 minutes is a legal act?"
The real victims of the
Laws of Desire are women from deprived socio-economic backgrounds. Desires under a thin red veil are the very excuse of fornication and prostitution under the legal cover in Islam. Jan Goodwin, in "
Price of Honour", provides a colourful cultural vignette of
Mut’ah:
“You probably had your chador on the wrong way around' my friend explained. 'That's one of the signals women use if they're looking for
sigheh”. ‘
Sigheh or
Mut’ah’ is an agreement between a man and a woman which is sanctioned by a cleric and can last as little as a few minutes or as long as ninety-nine years…
It is usually, where the man pays the woman an agreed sum of money in exchange for a temporary marriage. The usual motives is sex, but in some temporary marriages, where the agreement s are agreed upon for other purposes. When sex is the motive the transactions differ from prostitution, in that the agreed couple has to go before a cleric to record their erstwhile contract and in Iran, any children born of the union are legitimate. Otherwise, the Mut’ah is free of the responsibilities of marriage: the couple can make any agreements they like regarding how much time they will spend together in this agreement. It has also, as to how much money will be involved and what services, whether sexual or nonsexual relationship each will provide. The Shia’ites believes that Muhammad approved of Mut’ah. The Sunnis being the majority branch in Islam don't agree to this Law. Even in Shia’ite Iran, Mut’ah had fallen from favor until Rafsanjani encouraged it after the Iran-Iraq War which ended in 1988. In a 1990 sermon, he argued that the war had left a lot of young widows, many of them without hope of any remarriages. Such women he said needed both material support and sexual satisfactions. At the same time, plenty of young men who couldn't afford to set up house for a bride were postponing their marriages. Sexual tensions needed a healthy release he said, and since Mut’ah existed for that purpose within Islam, why not use it? His remarks sparked a heated debate amongst Iranian women, some of whom bitterly opposed these practices as exploitative. They argued that, the state should provide for these war widows adequately, so that they don't have to sell their bodies in Mut’ah. But others spoke out in its favor. Mut’ah, they said wasn't just a matter of money. Widows and divorcees had sexual needs and a desire for male company, and the "husband" was a welcomed male presence for the children in their homes. Iran's satirical weekly magazine the Golagha, ran a cartoon lampooning the likely effects of Rafsanjani's argument. It showed two desks for marriage licenses, one for Mut’ah and one for permanent wedlock. The clerk at the permanent desk had no customers; while the queue for Mut’ah stretched out the door."
Мене ова ми личи на санкционирано пердашење на мртво име и презиме, и тоа санкционирано од страна на верски лидери, свештеници, Имами!!!!!!!
Плус, ако се разменат пари, јебига, имамско санкционирана проституција!!
А нели тоа беше забрането од исламот??
Се повеќе и повеќе некои работи стануваат јасни и појасна е хипокризијата!