- Член од
- 13 јули 2006
- Мислења
- 15.660
- Поени од реакции
- 18.696
Политички случувања во САД: Генерална дискусија
- Креатор на темата Crazy in Love
- Време на започнување
- Член од
- 24 април 2008
- Мислења
- 11.316
- Поени од реакции
- 13.071
Сигурен си ?
Логиката вели така, но за жал македонските лингвисти од поодамна немаат направено ревизија на македонскиот правопис за да се дефинира кој израз треба да се користи.
Еве ти пример за македонската правописна неписменост.
https://www.libertas.mk/epl-stana-prvata-kompanija-vredna/
„Епл“ стана првата компанија вредна трилион долари – 1.000.000.000.000
3.08.18 10:14
„Епл“ стана првата јавна компанија во светот што вреди милијарда долари. Пазарната вредност на производителот на „Ајфон“ ја стигна вртоглавата цифра на утринското тргување во Њујорк, кога нејзините акции достигнаа рекордни 207 долари.
...
- Член од
- 13 јули 2006
- Мислења
- 15.660
- Поени од реакции
- 18.696
Абе немој и ти сега како @Bafra да ме носиш на месечина и да ми кажуваш дали нашиве лингвисти имаат врска или немаат.
Ова чист технички проблем, по ДИН и по ЈУС.
Еве провери во која група е Macedonia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_and_short_scales#Current_usage
Што е за нас 10 на 12 -та, што е за американците.
- Член од
- 24 април 2008
- Мислења
- 11.316
- Поени од реакции
- 13.071
Е па еве што велат Шпанците и Бошњаците со кои сме во истата група според Википедија.
https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Escalas_numéricas_larga_y_corta#Comparación_entre_la_escala_larga_y_la_corta
https://bs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duga_i_kratka_skala#Poređenje
Не знам кога и како @Bafra те носел на Месечина, но еве и јас ти велам - македонските лингвисти се` невработени и од поодамна немаат направено ревизија на македонскиот правопис.
Уставот предвидува обврска за сите државни и јавни институции да вработуваат лектори, ама бидејќи нема казни за неисполнувањето на таквата обврска, лекторите остануваат невработени.
- Член од
- 13 јули 2006
- Мислења
- 15.660
- Поени од реакции
- 18.696
Убо што ги најде линковите, кажи ми што заклучи од нив?
Нашите лектори се криви оти кај нас трилион не е исто со трилион во америка
- Член од
- 24 април 2008
- Мислења
- 11.316
- Поени од реакции
- 13.071
Убо што ги најде линковите, кажи ми што заклучи од нив?
Нашите лектори се криви оти кај нас трилион не е исто со трилион во америка
Ај прочитај уште еднаш, па можеби ќе разбереш нешто.
Милијарда е на македонски не билион, на англиски се изговара билион.
jamajka
mode: Calm
- Член од
- 28 април 2007
- Мислења
- 19.645
- Поени од реакции
- 27.609
Знам де како е на Македонски, ама тоа не значи дека е исправно... Ти кажувам како е Математички исправно, и мој став е дека мора да ги ревидираме нашите термини, барем во образовниот систем....
Милиард и билиард се користи и во Европа колку што знам...
еве го го најдов https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Names_of_large_numbers
Гледај на пример на европската скала како ќе го кажеш 10 на 33та ??
Мислам дека терминологијата што се нарекува во графиконот short scale е многу подобра и поинтуитивна....
INDIJANEC123
Женкар, Илуватар
https://tocka.com.mk/vesti/277220/t...-sad-predolgo-gi-gusat-amerikanskite-finansii
Удри во осилото Трамп, или ќе победи или како Кенеди ќе заврши...
Во меѓувреме Чомски:
http://kolozeg.info/2018/08/04/легендарниот-американски-филозоф-чо/
Удри во осилото Трамп, или ќе победи или како Кенеди ќе заврши...
Во меѓувреме Чомски:
http://kolozeg.info/2018/08/04/легендарниот-американски-филозоф-чо/
Тоа што прави Трамп истото го правеше Томас Џеферсон поранешен председател на САД пред 150години и успешно заврши но кратко траеше и пак се појави таквите како Ротдшилд затоа Трамп треба целосно да се искорени но дали ќе успее тоа ќе видиме
Sent from my iPhone 6s Plus using Tapatalk
B
Bafra
Гостин
Првиот линк е катастрофа, намерно пуштена патка во погрешен правец, луѓето да бараат вина на погрешно место.
http://www.publiceye.org/conspire/flaherty/flaherty5.html ФЕД не е во сопственост на Ротшилд.
Конгресот е тој кој има влијание. ФЕД на почетокот биле формирани со друга намена и функционирале на друг начин, се додека власта не успеала да ја преземе контролата.
The original design of the Fed was to be private, for banks were to contribute to fund their own bailouts, as JP Morgan had done taking the lead during the Panic of 1907. It was not to be a government bailout operation. The United States had no central bank at that time. There was never any intent to create the institution as it exists today: the original design was altered dramatically by lawyers
who never understood the madness of their own minds in their pursuit of power as politicians.The amount of propaganda against the Federal Reserve is incredible. What we must keep in mind is that its original design, which lasted for about one year, was brilliant. The classic banking model, borrowing from depositors on a demand basis and lending long-term making a profit on the spread in interest rates, such as business loans and mortgages. This was Relationship Banking not today’s Transactional Banking model.
The crisis comes during an economic contraction when people run to the bank for a loss of confidence and demand to withdraw their funds. This results in the value of cash rising in purchasing power, compared to assets, so asset values collapse.
The idea of “elastic money” was to increase the supply of cash during such a crisis to meet the demand for withdrawals and that would offset the need to sell assets by calling in long-term debts. By increasing the money supply on a temporary basis, the Fed could offset the contraction in theory smoothing out the business cycle.
This was a brilliant scheme. However, it has been Congress, and not the Fed, who has corrupted that mechanism.
The Fed was owned technically by the banks as this was supposed to save the taxpayer money. The banks should contribute to their own bailout fund.
Furthermore, the Fed’s design was also about buying in corporate paper when banks would not lend money. This was a mechanism used to offset rising unemployment if corporations could not fund their operations. They supplemented this by the management of regional interest rates to balance the domestic economy. Each branch of the Fed could raise or lower their local interest rate autonomously to attract capital when there was a local shortage or deflect capital when there was too much. This would often take place with the crop cycle, as money would flow in to pay the farmers upon delivery. Regional capital flows became the Texas-New York arbitrage for when Texas was booming New York was in recession and vice versa. This was the original design and purpose behind the Fed. The Jekyll Island meeting was held in secret ONLY because there was a very strong resentment against anyone with wealth as Marxism dominated the Progressive Movement of the era.
Congress began to manipulate the Federal Reserve for their own self-interest when World War I broke out on April 6, 1917. The alteration to the design of the Fed was to direct it to buy government bonds, not corporate. In this first step, they never reverse this decree after the war. They removed the brilliant design to stimulate the economy directly by purchasing corporate paper during a recession. In the last 2007-2009 crisis, the government wrote a check to TARP and hoped that the banks would lend money, but they did not. Removing this first pillar of the independent Fed distorted the entire system. It then made little sense for bankers to own share in an entity that was no longer privately controlled.
It is ironic that the conditions setting up today were also the case in 1927. The Fed back then lowered U.S. rates to try to deflect the capital inflows to help bailout Europe. The markets eventually backfired and capital shifted. It poured into the USA and doubled the U.S. share market, despite doubling interest rates to try to prevent the crisis they helped to create. This all led to the 1931 sovereign debt crisis and those economic declines resulted in political chaos. In 1933, FDR came to power, but so did Hitler and Mao. That was all made possible because of the collapse in government debt. We are in the very same position today as the Fed is surrendering domestic policy objectives for international concerns.
Не зафркавај, прво Томас бил polymath, а Трамп е сенилен дедо. Интелектот на Томас е поголем од на сите претседатели заедно
Второ, место да бараш вина кај Ротшилд (што намерно некој погрешно не насочил) пробај види да не се крие зајакот во друга дупка.
Ротшилд ниту има војска, ниту има право да носи закони, а ниту се шета со армија од телохранители.
Дел од квалитетите на Томас:
He was an active member and eventual president of the American Philosophical Society. This may be reflected best in what became known as “Jefferson’s Bible” or “The Life and Morals of Jesus of Nazareth” its formal title. He constructed this interesting book during the latter years of his life by cutting and pasting with a razor and glue numerous sections from the New Testament as extractions of the doctrine of Jesus. What Jefferson was doing was trying to reduce this to the philosophy of Jesus – the thinking process minus the religion. Jefferson’s condensed composition was misunderstood, for it became notable for its exclusion of all miracles by Jesus and most mentions of the supernatural, including sections of the four gospels that contain the resurrection and most other miracles, as well as passages indicating Jesus was divine. He was interested in the pure teachings without the religious embellishment – sort of only his direct philosophy reduced in a manner such as extraction something akin to the Ten Commandments rather than other’s interpretation.
Jefferson was a deep thinker. He was conversant in French, Greek, Italian, Latin, and Spanish, and studied other languages and linguistics – interests that led him to found the University of Virginia after his presidency. Although not a notable orator, Jefferson was a skilled writer and corresponded with many influential people in America and Europe throughout his adult life......
И многу битно што предлагал ама не успеало:
His view that a national debt is enslaving turning future generations and amounts to taxation without representation is stunningly correct.
“Every constitution, then, and every law, naturally expires at the end of nineteen years. If it be enforced longer, it is an act of force, and not of right. It may be said, that the succeeding generation exercising, in fact, the power of repeal, this leaves them as free as if the constitution or law had been expressly limited to nineteen years only. In the first place, this objection admits the right, in proposing an equivalent. But the power of repeal is not an equivalent. It might be, indeed, if every form of government were so perfectly contrived, that the will of the majority could always be obtained, fairly and without impediment. But this is true of no form. The people cannot assemble themselves; their representation is unequal and vicious. Various checks are opposed to every legislative proposition. Factions get possession of the public councils, bribery corrupts them, personal interests lead them astray from the general interests of their constituents; and other impediments arise, so as to prove to every practical man, that a law of limited duration is much more manageable than one which needs a repeal.”
Не знам точно како било во времето на Томас Џеферсон бидејќи гледав на ТВ дискавери или нешнел џиографик не се сеќавам кое канал беше за Томс Џ. и правеше баш како Трамп , а тоа што е постиран на англиски и не знам дали е така или нешто друго како би знаел не знам
Sent from my iPhone 6s Plus using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone 6s Plus using Tapatalk
INDIJANEC123
Женкар, Илуватар
По твое Ротшилдови и компанија ги користат како дефокус на јавноста од корумпираните политичари, нешто како дежурни страшила.Првиот линк е катастрофа, намерно пуштена патка во погрешен правец, луѓето да бараат вина на погрешно место.
http://www.publiceye.org/conspire/flaherty/flaherty5.html ФЕД не е во сопственост на Ротшилд.
Конгресот е тој кој има влијание. ФЕД на почетокот биле формирани со друга намена и функционирале на друг начин, се додека власта не успеала да ја преземе контролата.
The original design of the Fed was to be private, for banks were to contribute to fund their own bailouts, as JP Morgan had done taking the lead during the Panic of 1907. It was not to be a government bailout operation. The United States had no central bank at that time. There was never any intent to create the institution as it exists today: the original design was altered dramatically by lawyers
The amount of propaganda against the Federal Reserve is incredible. What we must keep in mind is that its original design, which lasted for about one year, was brilliant. The classic banking model, borrowing from depositors on a demand basis and lending long-term making a profit on the spread in interest rates, such as business loans and mortgages. This was Relationship Banking not today’s Transactional Banking model.
The crisis comes during an economic contraction when people run to the bank for a loss of confidence and demand to withdraw their funds. This results in the value of cash rising in purchasing power, compared to assets, so asset values collapse.
The idea of “elastic money” was to increase the supply of cash during such a crisis to meet the demand for withdrawals and that would offset the need to sell assets by calling in long-term debts. By increasing the money supply on a temporary basis, the Fed could offset the contraction in theory smoothing out the business cycle.
This was a brilliant scheme. However, it has been Congress, and not the Fed, who has corrupted that mechanism.
The Fed was owned technically by the banks as this was supposed to save the taxpayer money. The banks should contribute to their own bailout fund.
Furthermore, the Fed’s design was also about buying in corporate paper when banks would not lend money. This was a mechanism used to offset rising unemployment if corporations could not fund their operations. They supplemented this by the management of regional interest rates to balance the domestic economy. Each branch of the Fed could raise or lower their local interest rate autonomously to attract capital when there was a local shortage or deflect capital when there was too much. This would often take place with the crop cycle, as money would flow in to pay the farmers upon delivery. Regional capital flows became the Texas-New York arbitrage for when Texas was booming New York was in recession and vice versa. This was the original design and purpose behind the Fed. The Jekyll Island meeting was held in secret ONLY because there was a very strong resentment against anyone with wealth as Marxism dominated the Progressive Movement of the era.
Congress began to manipulate the Federal Reserve for their own self-interest when World War I broke out on April 6, 1917. The alteration to the design of the Fed was to direct it to buy government bonds, not corporate. In this first step, they never reverse this decree after the war. They removed the brilliant design to stimulate the economy directly by purchasing corporate paper during a recession. In the last 2007-2009 crisis, the government wrote a check to TARP and hoped that the banks would lend money, but they did not. Removing this first pillar of the independent Fed distorted the entire system. It then made little sense for bankers to own share in an entity that was no longer privately controlled.
It is ironic that the conditions setting up today were also the case in 1927. The Fed back then lowered U.S. rates to try to deflect the capital inflows to help bailout Europe. The markets eventually backfired and capital shifted. It poured into the USA and doubled the U.S. share market, despite doubling interest rates to try to prevent the crisis they helped to create. This all led to the 1931 sovereign debt crisis and those economic declines resulted in political chaos. In 1933, FDR came to power, but so did Hitler and Mao. That was all made possible because of the collapse in government debt. We are in the very same position today as the Fed is surrendering domestic policy objectives for international concerns.
Не зафркавај, прво Томас бил polymath, а Трамп е сенилен дедо. Интелектот на Томас е поголем од на сите претседатели заедно
Второ, место да бараш вина кај Ротшилд (што намерно некој погрешно не насочил) пробај види да не се крие зајакот во друга дупка.
Ротшилд ниту има војска, ниту има право да носи закони, а ниту се шета со армија од телохранители.
Дел од квалитетите на Томас:
He was an active member and eventual president of the American Philosophical Society. This may be reflected best in what became known as “Jefferson’s Bible” or “The Life and Morals of Jesus of Nazareth” its formal title. He constructed this interesting book during the latter years of his life by cutting and pasting with a razor and glue numerous sections from the New Testament as extractions of the doctrine of Jesus. What Jefferson was doing was trying to reduce this to the philosophy of Jesus – the thinking process minus the religion. Jefferson’s condensed composition was misunderstood, for it became notable for its exclusion of all miracles by Jesus and most mentions of the supernatural, including sections of the four gospels that contain the resurrection and most other miracles, as well as passages indicating Jesus was divine. He was interested in the pure teachings without the religious embellishment – sort of only his direct philosophy reduced in a manner such as extraction something akin to the Ten Commandments rather than other’s interpretation.
Jefferson was a deep thinker. He was conversant in French, Greek, Italian, Latin, and Spanish, and studied other languages and linguistics – interests that led him to found the University of Virginia after his presidency. Although not a notable orator, Jefferson was a skilled writer and corresponded with many influential people in America and Europe throughout his adult life......
И многу битно што предлагал ама не успеало:
His view that a national debt is enslaving turning future generations and amounts to taxation without representation is stunningly correct.
“Every constitution, then, and every law, naturally expires at the end of nineteen years. If it be enforced longer, it is an act of force, and not of right. It may be said, that the succeeding generation exercising, in fact, the power of repeal, this leaves them as free as if the constitution or law had been expressly limited to nineteen years only. In the first place, this objection admits the right, in proposing an equivalent. But the power of repeal is not an equivalent. It might be, indeed, if every form of government were so perfectly contrived, that the will of the majority could always be obtained, fairly and without impediment. But this is true of no form. The people cannot assemble themselves; their representation is unequal and vicious. Various checks are opposed to every legislative proposition. Factions get possession of the public councils, bribery corrupts them, personal interests lead them astray from the general interests of their constituents; and other impediments arise, so as to prove to every practical man, that a law of limited duration is much more manageable than one which needs a repeal.”