9/11 Терористи или сепак не?

Кој ги урна кулите

  • Терористи

    Гласови: 130 20,7%
  • Американски владини структури

    Гласови: 410 65,4%
  • Појма немам

    Гласови: 87 13,9%

  • Вкупно гласачи
    627
R

RAYTHEON23

Гостин
Ова е репер за најдолгиот пост!!!!!!

Респект... а насловот им е КОНТРОВЕРЗИ...епа има блогови и :toe::toe:

сега ние збориме за зградите авионите(за кои има ДОКАЗИ:vozbud: и Како се одвивала реакцијата а и погоре убаво објаснив

и сега на гуугл рвите 3000 резултати се теории на заговор(рекордна теории) и пази КОНТРОВЕРЗНИ МЕГУ СЕБЕ...И ОДГОВОР????

за ова????

епа такви како него еднаш велат имало ТНТ...па поле НЕ било така имало ПЕТИН...:vozbud:

ама не бе истите потоа велат било РДЏ па Ц’.....

за потоа самите да изгорат пред вистината кога тврдат дека има термите(сличнона напалм но послабо) значи со огромна темперетура пореметување на структурата

а
после велат од оган не може да се сруши зграда:vozbud:

тие се како соросоидите...и кај нас има експерти по видеа....
плиззз????:toe:
 
R

RAYTHEON23

Гостин
епа тоа велам несвесна контрола...истражувањето и учењето од книги и пракса е сведено на видеа:toe:

колку часа го ставале експлозивот и од каде е по кои стандарди:vozbud:
 
Член од
14 декември 2007
Мислења
3.271
Поени од реакции
708
del od Knigi so dokazi za 9/11 deka e inside job i edna golema laga



America’s “War on Terrorism” od Michel Chossudovsky

Chossudovsky explains how the “war on terrorism” is a complete fabrication based on the illusion that one man, Osama bin Laden, outwitted the $40 billion-a-year American intelligence apparatus. The “war on terrorism” is a war of conquest. Globalisation is the final march to the “New World Order”, dominated by Wall Street and the U.S. military-industrial complex. 2001-09-11 provides a justification for waging a war without borders, including the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq. Washington’s agenda consists in extending the frontiers of the American Empire to facilitate complete U.S. corporate control, while installing within America the institutions of the Homeland Security State. Chossudovsky peels back layers of rhetoric to reveal a complex web of deceit aimed at luring the American people and the rest of the world into accepting a military solution which threatens the future of humanity.


Against All Enemies: Inside the White House’s War on Terror — What Really Happened


Watch out! There are at least four different books all titled Against All Enemies. Clarke was Bush’s #1 counter terrorist. He accuses Bush of doing "a terrible job on the war against terrorism." When Clarke told Bush that U.S. intelligence agencies had never found a connection between Iraq and al-Qaeda, Bush said, "Iraq! Saddam! Find out if there’s a connection" and in a way that made it clear he was to find a connection even if one did not exist.


I Is for Infidel: From Holy War to Holy Terror in Afghanistan od Kathy Gannon

I heard Gannon being interviewed on the CBC. She struck me as wise and informed on the matter of Afghanistan. She helps you understand the war from the point of view of Canadian military, Americans, the Taliban, the Karzai government, non-Taliban insurgents and ordinary Afghans. Her basic thesis is the war has been going on for five years and Afghanistan is less secure than it was in 2001. Obviously a new strategy is needed, one that will win the loyalty of the Afghan people.


9/11 & American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out od David Ray Griffin


The 9/11 Commission Report, Omissions and Distortions od David Ray Griffin

300 pages dissecting the 9/11 Commission Report.
  • Chapter 1: lies about the hijackers.
  • Chapter 2: collapse of the World Trade Towers, why it had to be a demolition.
  • Chapter 3: Pentagon strike, missing video, missing black boxes.
  • Chapter 4: Bush’s actions during the strike. The pet goat.
  • Chapter 5: Advance information about the strikes.
  • Chapter 6: the bin Ladens and their long time friendship with the Bushes.
  • Chapter 7: helping the bin Ladens escape when the rest of the county was in lockdown.
  • Chapter 8: FBI subversion
  • Chapter 9: Pakistan’s role
  • Chapter 10: Bush’s motives
  • Chapter 11:Timelines
  • Chapters 12-17: miscellaneous details

Screwed: The Undeclared War Against the Middle Class — and what we can do about it. od Thom Hartmann



The Big Wedding: 9/11, the Whistle Blowers, and the Cover-up od Sander Hicks

From Soft Skull Press who also published Fortunate Son: George W. Bush and the Making of an American President by James H. Hatfield who was murdered for his trouble. It covers everything about the false flag hijackers including the infamous “match call”, the leak of which absolutely enraged Dick Cheney, since it revealed that the US government, and not the hijackers, selected the actual date for the attack.


Painful Questions: An Analysis of the September 11th Attack od Eric Hufschmid

Very detailed analysis of physical 9/11 evidence, e.g. photos and videos of the three plane hits and the rubble. I was never much interested in the 9/11 physical evidence until I heard Hufschmid. He makes a solid case that a Boeing 757 could not possibly have hit the Pentagon, and that all three towers had to have collapsed from explosives rather than fires. His work does not require tea leaf reading fuzzy photographs.


Alice in Wonderland and the World Trade Center Disaster od David Icke

Icke is the mother of all conspiracy theorists. My "conspiracy theory" about him is that he affects a few random lunatic beliefs, e.g. that reptiles are taking over people’s minds, in order to avoid being assassinated for spilling too many embarrassing facts about 9/11. Like Rense, he mostly just points you to other sources where you can judge for yourself how credible the information is. He hosts a popular

Without Precedent: The inside story of the 9/11 Commission od Thomas H. Kean and Lee H. Hamilton

9/11: The Big Lie od Thierry Meyssan

The physical evidence why the Boeing 757 flight 77 could not possibly have hit the Pentagon as Bush claims.

Through Our Enemies’ Eyes: Osama bin Laden, Radical Islam, and the Future of America od Michael Scheuer

Michael Scheuer was head of the bin Laden unit at the CIA until 2003. He chastises the politicians for feeding the public nonsense about bin Laden’s motives. They have nothing to do with American lifestyle, desire to curtail American freedom or desire to prosletyse Islam. bin Laden’s complaints are with American foreign policy in the middle east, including America’s unqualified support for Israel. He chastises his fellow American for underestimating bin Laden and the Muslims in general. He thinks bin Laden’s next attack will be even more dramatic than 9/11. He points out there is no small band of evil doers to arrest and punish. There are now millions of Muslims who are ready to use violence against the USA, living all over the world.


9-11 On Trial: Proof That the Government’s Official Version Is a Lie od Victor Thorn

A simulated criminal prosecution based on physical evidence that 9/11 was an inside job masterminded by Cheney/Bush. A bit hokey and folksy, but easily accessible.
 
R

RAYTHEON23

Гостин
види вака има многуповеке луге кои гледаат во 3Д но како на кантер...а интересно е што има помулку што гледаат од птичја перспектива(ко у стратегија)...ете доказ сум јас гледам од птичја перспектива а доказ е распореденоста на трупите:)

значи за дејвид ајк инеговите лаги и дијагноза(знаете)

del od Knigi so dokazi za 9/11 deka e inside job i edna golema laga



America’s “War on Terrorism” od Michel Chossudovsky

Chossudovsky explains how the “war on terrorism” is a complete fabrication based on the illusion that one man, Osama bin Laden, outwitted the $40 billion-a-year American intelligence apparatus. The “war on terrorism” is a war of conquest. Globalisation is the final march to the “New World Order”, dominated by Wall Street and the U.S. military-industrial complex. 2001-09-11 provides a justification for waging a war without borders, including the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq. Washington’s agenda consists in extending the frontiers of the American Empire to facilitate complete U.S. corporate control, while installing within America the institutions of the Homeland Security State. Chossudovsky peels back layers of rhetoric to reveal a complex web of deceit aimed at luring the American people and the rest of the world into accepting a military solution which threatens the future of humanity.


Against All Enemies: Inside the White House’s War on Terror — What Really Happened


Watch out! There are at least four different books all titled Against All Enemies. Clarke was Bush’s #1 counter terrorist. He accuses Bush of doing "a terrible job on the war against terrorism." When Clarke told Bush that U.S. intelligence agencies had never found a connection between Iraq and al-Qaeda, Bush said, "Iraq! Saddam! Find out if there’s a connection" and in a way that made it clear he was to find a connection even if one did not exist.


I Is for Infidel: From Holy War to Holy Terror in Afghanistan od Kathy Gannon

I heard Gannon being interviewed on the CBC. She struck me as wise and informed on the matter of Afghanistan. She helps you understand the war from the point of view of Canadian military, Americans, the Taliban, the Karzai government, non-Taliban insurgents and ordinary Afghans. Her basic thesis is the war has been going on for five years and Afghanistan is less secure than it was in 2001. Obviously a new strategy is needed, one that will win the loyalty of the Afghan people.


9/11 & American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out od David Ray Griffin


The 9/11 Commission Report, Omissions and Distortions od David Ray Griffin

300 pages dissecting the 9/11 Commission Report.
  • Chapter 1: lies about the hijackers.
  • Chapter 2: collapse of the World Trade Towers, why it had to be a demolition.
  • Chapter 3: Pentagon strike, missing video, missing black boxes.
  • Chapter 4: Bush’s actions during the strike. The pet goat.
  • Chapter 5: Advance information about the strikes.
  • Chapter 6: the bin Ladens and their long time friendship with the Bushes.
  • Chapter 7: helping the bin Ladens escape when the rest of the county was in lockdown.
  • Chapter 8: FBI subversion
  • Chapter 9: Pakistan’s role
  • Chapter 10: Bush’s motives
  • Chapter 11:Timelines
  • Chapters 12-17: miscellaneous details

Screwed: The Undeclared War Against the Middle Class — and what we can do about it. od Thom Hartmann



The Big Wedding: 9/11, the Whistle Blowers, and the Cover-up od Sander Hicks

From Soft Skull Press who also published Fortunate Son: George W. Bush and the Making of an American President by James H. Hatfield who was murdered for his trouble. It covers everything about the false flag hijackers including the infamous “match call”, the leak of which absolutely enraged Dick Cheney, since it revealed that the US government, and not the hijackers, selected the actual date for the attack.


Painful Questions: An Analysis of the September 11th Attack od Eric Hufschmid

Very detailed analysis of physical 9/11 evidence, e.g. photos and videos of the three plane hits and the rubble. I was never much interested in the 9/11 physical evidence until I heard Hufschmid. He makes a solid case that a Boeing 757 could not possibly have hit the Pentagon, and that all three towers had to have collapsed from explosives rather than fires. His work does not require tea leaf reading fuzzy photographs.


Alice in Wonderland and the World Trade Center Disaster od David Icke

Icke is the mother of all conspiracy theorists. My "conspiracy theory" about him is that he affects a few random lunatic beliefs, e.g. that reptiles are taking over people’s minds, in order to avoid being assassinated for spilling too many embarrassing facts about 9/11. Like Rense, he mostly just points you to other sources where you can judge for yourself how credible the information is. He hosts a popular

Without Precedent: The inside story of the 9/11 Commission od Thomas H. Kean and Lee H. Hamilton

9/11: The Big Lie od Thierry Meyssan

The physical evidence why the Boeing 757 flight 77 could not possibly have hit the Pentagon as Bush claims.

Through Our Enemies’ Eyes: Osama bin Laden, Radical Islam, and the Future of America od Michael Scheuer

Michael Scheuer was head of the bin Laden unit at the CIA until 2003. He chastises the politicians for feeding the public nonsense about bin Laden’s motives. They have nothing to do with American lifestyle, desire to curtail American freedom or desire to prosletyse Islam. bin Laden’s complaints are with American foreign policy in the middle east, including America’s unqualified support for Israel. He chastises his fellow American for underestimating bin Laden and the Muslims in general. He thinks bin Laden’s next attack will be even more dramatic than 9/11. He points out there is no small band of evil doers to arrest and punish. There are now millions of Muslims who are ready to use violence against the USA, living all over the world.


9-11 On Trial: Proof That the Government’s Official Version Is a Lie od Victor Thorn

A simulated criminal prosecution based on physical evidence that 9/11 was an inside job masterminded by Cheney/Bush. A bit hokey and folksy, but easily accessible.
ЕВЕ америка е КО ИРАН:vozbud:

ист лајфстајл барбикју абе шо се нема...ете експерти...ПЕРО ЛАЖГОТО...експерт ХХ или доктор ХУ
 
Член од
14 декември 2007
Мислења
3.271
Поени од реакции
708
i uste KNIGI








covername and descriptionordering [SIZE=+1]The World Is Turning: ''9/11'', the Movement for Justice, and Reclaiming America for the World[/SIZE]
by Don Paul

[SIZE=-1] This volume is a compilation of several earlier works and new material by one of the first and most persistent investigators of the the attack of 9/11/2001, Don Paul. With a foreward by whistleblower Kevin Ryan, The World Is Turning penetrates the web of deceit surrounding the crime with a clear exposition of the physical evidence of the controlled demolition of the World Trade Center, and analysis of who benefited. Paul's earlier historic book Facing Our Fascist State, out of print for years, is included in its entirety. [/SIZE]wireonfire.com
[SIZE=+1]Waking Up from Our Nightmare, the 9/11/01 Crimes in New York City[/SIZE]
by Don Paul and Jim Hoffman

[SIZE=-1] This richly illustrated 80-page book provides simple proofs that the World Trade Center towers and Building 7 were destroyed through controlled demolition. It then details the individuals and industries that have profited from that day's destruction in New York City and from the ensuing "War on Terror" -- real estate interests, military contractors, oil-and-gas corporations, narcotics traffickers, and above all global financial institutions. The final section of Waking Up ... concerns 'Cooperative Solutions' that are now at work around the world -- community currencies, organic farming, women's development banks, eco-banks, wind and solar power, and truly independent media.

Waking Up has 91 illustrations and 101 references. Sample pages can be viewed here.

Dr. Kevin Danaher wrote that the book "does the public a great service by graphically exposing some of the lies regarding the 9/11/01 crimes in New York City, and then proposing alternatives to the system that perpetrates such crimes and lies." [/SIZE]
wtc7.net
[SIZE=+1]The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions[/SIZE]
by David Ray Griffin

[SIZE=-1] This detailed, incisive, and thoroughly referenced book exposes the 9/11 Commission's report as a sham. It begins by revealing that the "National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States" which describes itself as "an independent, bipartisan commission," was guided by executive director Philip Zelikow, an insider in both the first and second Bush administrations.
The book consists of two main parts: the first examines evidence contradicting the official story, and the second looks at the commission's attempt to absolve the US military of responsibility by crafting a new timeline of response to the attack. The first part contains the following chapters:
  1. The Alleged Hijackers
  2. The Collapse of the World Trade Center Buildings
  3. The Strike on the Pentagon
  4. The Behavior of Bush and His Secret Service
  5. Advance Information about the Attacks
  6. Osama, the bin Ladens, and the Saudi Royal Family
  7. The Saudi Flights
  8. FBI Obstructions
  9. Pakistan and Its ISI
  10. Possible Motives of the Bush Administration
Chapter 2 provides one of the most concise yet thorough refutations of the official account of the collapses of WTC 1, 2, and 7 to date.
This book complements Griffin's earlier book The New Pearl Harbor and could become even more important because it so throughly devastates the widely accepted Commission Report. [/SIZE]
amazon.com

[SIZE=+1]Christian Faith and the Truth Behind 9/11[/SIZE]
by David Griffin

[SIZE=-1] This is Dr. Griffin's third major book analyzing the 9/11/01 attack. Unlike his previous books, The New Pearl Harbor and Omissions and Distortions, this book devotes one of its two parts, 'A Christian Critique of 9/11 and American Imperialism,' to a philosophical and ethical analysis of the geopolitical context of the attack. Nonetheless, the book's first part, 'Evidence That 9/11 Was a False-Flag Operation' contains Griffin's most detailed analysis of the attack, including his essays 'The Destruction of the World Trade Center: Why the Official Account Cannot Be True' and 'Flights of Fancy: The 9/11 Commission's Incredible Tales of Flights 11, 175, 77, and 93.' [/SIZE]amazon.com
[SIZE=+1]The Hidden History of 9-11-2001[/SIZE]
by Paul Zarembka

[SIZE=-1] This book is a compilation of essays by various authors about the 9/11/01 attack and its context. PART II -- THE MORNING OF 9-11-2001 -- and PART III -- THE CONTEXT OF 9-11-2001 AND MEANING FOR THE FUTURE -- contain the following essays:

Initiation of the 9-11 Operation, with Evidence of Insider Trading Beforehand
---- Paul Zarembka, State University of New York at Buffalo
The Destruction of the World Trade Center: Why the Official Account Cannot Be True
---- David Ray Griffin, Emeritus, Claremont School of Theology, California
The Military Drills on 9-11: 'Bizarre Coincidence' or Something Else?
---- Four Arrows, aka Don Jacobs, Northern Arizona University
Terrorism and Statecraft: Al-Qaeda and Western Covert Operations after the Cold War
---- Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed, Institute for Policy Research and Development, London
September 11 as 'Machiavellian State Terrorism'
---- David MacGregor, King's University College, University of Western Ontario
Making History: The Compromised 9-11 Commission
---- Bryan Sacks, Drexel University, Philadelphia
Islamophobia and the 'War On Terror': The Continuing Pretext for U.S. Imperial Conquest
---- Diana Ralph, Carleton University, Ottawa [/SIZE]
amazon.com
[SIZE=+1]Facing our Fascist State[/SIZE]
by Don Paul

[SIZE=-1] This book briefly but persuasively addresses the collapses of the Twin Towers and Bulding 7. Paul cites studies by the Corus Construction corporation, which measured the temperatures of steel columns and beams in uninsulated steel-frame car-parks subjected to sustained hydrocarbon-fueled fires. The highest steel temperatures recorded in those studies was only 360ºC, far below the 800ºC figure assumed by the column failure theory. Paul's book covers issues of WTC ownership and insurance in some detail, and has information on who was warned and who avoided the WTC on September 11th. This book has been re-published as part of the compilation The World is Turning[/SIZE]wireonfire.com
[SIZE=+1]The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions about the Bush Administration and 9/11[/SIZE]
by David Ray Griffin

[SIZE=-1] This 256-page book essentially summarizes the research of independent investigators of the 9/11/01 attack, and builds a cumulative argument implicating at least the Bush administration in the attack. Griffin addresses the breadth of evidence against the official story, ranging from failures to intercept the hijacked planes, to problems in the offical accounts of the Pentagon attack and World Trade Center building collapses, to detailed foreknowledge of the attack. Griffin features Eric Hufschmid on evidence that the World Trade Center was demolished, and Thierry Meyssan and Gerard Holmgren on theories about what hit the Pentagon. Griffin's book is well organized, logically robust, and supported by an extensive bibliography. Its main weakness is its promotion of the claims of no-757-crash theorists, such as Meyssan's claim that the Pentagon impact hole diameter was 18 feet. [/SIZE]amazon.com


[SIZE=-1][/SIZE]
 
R

RAYTHEON23

Гостин
9-11 On Trial: Proof That the Government’s Official Version Is a Lie od Victor Thorn

A simulated criminal prosecution based on physical evidence that 9/11 was an inside job masterminded by Cheney/Bush. A bit hokey and folksy, but easily accessible.

нели не се они...не можат двајца да заговараат против својата земја и зајтгејс да ги разоткрие...има комисии групи а има и ромско лоби:toe:

д врлд ис трнинг......знаеме..се движи општеството:uvo::uvo::uvo:

и светот...такви книги се пропаганда на гугл 1000 резултати одбегнете оти е комерцијала:toe:
 
Член од
14 декември 2007
Мислења
3.271
Поени од реакции
708
malku za Penthagon


The Pentagon

At 9:37 am on 9/11, 51 minutes after the first plane hit the World Trade Center, the Pentagon was similarly attacked. Though dozens of witnesses saw a Boeing 757 hit the building, conspiracy advocates insist there is evidence that a missile or a different type of plane smashed into the Pentagon.

HQ Attack: Taken three days after 9/11, this photo shows the extent of the damage to the Pentagon, consistent with a fiery plane crash. (Photograph by Department of Defense)

Big Plane, Small Holes

Claim: Two holes were visible in the Pentagon immediately after the attack: a 75-ft.-wide entry hole in the building's exterior wall, and a 16-ft.-wide hole in Ring C, the Pentagon's middle ring. Conspiracy theorists claim both holes are far too small to have been made by a Boeing 757. "How does a plane 125 ft. wide and 155 ft. long fit into a hole which is only 16 ft. across?" asks reopen911.org, a Web site "dedicated to discovering the bottom line truth to what really occurred on September 11, 2001."

The truth is of even less importance to French author Thierry Meyssan, whose baseless assertions are fodder for even mainstream European and Middle Eastern media. In his book The Big Lie, Meyssan concludes that the Pentagon was struck by a satellite-guided missile — part of an elaborate U.S. military coup. "This attack," he writes, "could only be committed by United States military personnel against other U.S. military personnel."

Hole Truth: Flight 77's landing gear punched a 12-ft. hole into the Pentagon's Ring C. (Photograph by Department of Defense)

FACT: When American Airlines Flight 77 hit the Pentagon's exterior wall, Ring E, it created a hole approximately 75 ft. wide, according to the ASCE Pentagon Building Performance Report. The exterior facade collapsed about 20 minutes after impact, but ASCE based its measurements of the original hole on the number of first-floor support columns that were destroyed or damaged. Computer simulations confirmed the findings.

Why wasn't the hole as wide as a 757's 124-ft.-10-in. wingspan? A crashing jet doesn't punch a cartoon-like outline of itself into a reinforced concrete building, says ASCE team member Mete Sozen, a professor of structural engineering at Purdue University. In this case, one wing hit the ground; the other was sheared off by the force of the impact with the Pentagon's load-bearing columns, explains Sozen, who specializes in the behavior of concrete buildings. What was left of the plane flowed into the structure in a state closer to a liquid than a solid mass. "If you expected the entire wing to cut into the building," Sozen tells PM, "it didn't happen."

The tidy hole in Ring C was 12 ft. wide — not 16 ft. ASCE concludes it was made by the jet's landing gear, not by the fuselage.

Intact Windows

Claim: Many Pentagon windows remained in one piece — even those just above the point of impact from the Boeing 757 passenger plane. Pentagonstrike.co.uk, an online animation widely circulated in the United States and Europe, claims that photographs showing "intact windows" directly above the crash site prove "a missile" or "a craft much smaller than a 757" struck the Pentagon.

FACT: Some windows near the impact area did indeed survive the crash. But that's what the windows were supposed to do — they're blast-resistant.

"A blast-resistant window must be designed to resist a force significantly higher than a hurricane that's hitting instantaneously," says Ken Hays, executive vice president of Masonry Arts, the Bessemer, Ala., company that designed, manufactured and installed the Pentagon windows. Some were knocked out of the walls by the crash and the outer ring's later collapse. "They were not designed to receive wracking seismic force," Hays notes. "They were designed to take in inward pressure from a blast event, which apparently they did: [Before the collapse] the blinds were still stacked neatly behind the window glass."

Flight 77 Debris

Claim: Conspiracy theorists insist there was no plane wreckage at the Pentagon. "In reality, a Boeing 757 was never found," claims pentagonstrike.co.uk, which asks the question, "What hit the Pentagon on 9/11?"

Aftermath: Wreckage from Flight 77 on the Pentagon's lawn — proof that a passenger plane, not a missile, hit the building. (Photograph by AP/Wide World Photos)

FACT: Blast expert Allyn E. Kilsheimer was the first structural engineer to arrive at the Pentagon after the crash and helped coordinate the emergency response. "It was absolutely a plane, and I'll tell you why," says Kilsheimer, CEO of KCE Structural Engineers PC, Washington, D.C. "I saw the marks of the plane wing on the face of the building. I picked up parts of the plane with the airline markings on them. I held in my hand the tail section of the plane, and I found the black box." Kilsheimer's eyewitness account is backed up by photos of plane wreckage inside and outside the building. Kilsheimer adds: "I held parts of uniforms from crew members in my hands, including body parts. Okay?
 
R

RAYTHEON23

Гостин
malku za Penthagon


The Pentagon

At 9:37 am on 9/11, 51 minutes after the first plane hit the World Trade Center, the Pentagon was similarly attacked. Though dozens of witnesses saw a Boeing 757 hit the building, conspiracy advocates insist there is evidence that a missile or a different type of plane smashed into the Pentagon.

HQ Attack: Taken three days after 9/11, this photo shows the extent of the damage to the Pentagon, consistent with a fiery plane crash. (Photograph by Department of Defense)

Big Plane, Small Holes

Claim: Two holes were visible in the Pentagon immediately after the attack: a 75-ft.-wide entry hole in the building's exterior wall, and a 16-ft.-wide hole in Ring C, the Pentagon's middle ring. Conspiracy theorists claim both holes are far too small to have been made by a Boeing 757. "How does a plane 125 ft. wide and 155 ft. long fit into a hole which is only 16 ft. across?" asks reopen911.org, a Web site "dedicated to discovering the bottom line truth to what really occurred on September 11, 2001."

The truth is of even less importance to French author Thierry Meyssan, whose baseless assertions are fodder for even mainstream European and Middle Eastern media. In his book The Big Lie, Meyssan concludes that the Pentagon was struck by a satellite-guided missile — part of an elaborate U.S. military coup. "This attack," he writes, "could only be committed by United States military personnel against other U.S. military personnel."

Hole Truth: Flight 77's landing gear punched a 12-ft. hole into the Pentagon's Ring C. (Photograph by Department of Defense)

FACT: When American Airlines Flight 77 hit the Pentagon's exterior wall, Ring E, it created a hole approximately 75 ft. wide, according to the ASCE Pentagon Building Performance Report. The exterior facade collapsed about 20 minutes after impact, but ASCE based its measurements of the original hole on the number of first-floor support columns that were destroyed or damaged. Computer simulations confirmed the findings.

Why wasn't the hole as wide as a 757's 124-ft.-10-in. wingspan? A crashing jet doesn't punch a cartoon-like outline of itself into a reinforced concrete building, says ASCE team member Mete Sozen, a professor of structural engineering at Purdue University. In this case, one wing hit the ground; the other was sheared off by the force of the impact with the Pentagon's load-bearing columns, explains Sozen, who specializes in the behavior of concrete buildings. What was left of the plane flowed into the structure in a state closer to a liquid than a solid mass. "If you expected the entire wing to cut into the building," Sozen tells PM, "it didn't happen."

The tidy hole in Ring C was 12 ft. wide — not 16 ft. ASCE concludes it was made by the jet's landing gear, not by the fuselage.

Intact Windows

Claim: Many Pentagon windows remained in one piece — even those just above the point of impact from the Boeing 757 passenger plane. Pentagonstrike.co.uk, an online animation widely circulated in the United States and Europe, claims that photographs showing "intact windows" directly above the crash site prove "a missile" or "a craft much smaller than a 757" struck the Pentagon.

FACT: Some windows near the impact area did indeed survive the crash. But that's what the windows were supposed to do — they're blast-resistant.

"A blast-resistant window must be designed to resist a force significantly higher than a hurricane that's hitting instantaneously," says Ken Hays, executive vice president of Masonry Arts, the Bessemer, Ala., company that designed, manufactured and installed the Pentagon windows. Some were knocked out of the walls by the crash and the outer ring's later collapse. "They were not designed to receive wracking seismic force," Hays notes. "They were designed to take in inward pressure from a blast event, which apparently they did: [Before the collapse] the blinds were still stacked neatly behind the window glass."

Flight 77 Debris

Claim: Conspiracy theorists insist there was no plane wreckage at the Pentagon. "In reality, a Boeing 757 was never found," claims pentagonstrike.co.uk, which asks the question, "What hit the Pentagon on 9/11?"

Aftermath: Wreckage from Flight 77 on the Pentagon's lawn — proof that a passenger plane, not a missile, hit the building. (Photograph by AP/Wide World Photos)

FACT: Blast expert Allyn E. Kilsheimer was the first structural engineer to arrive at the Pentagon after the crash and helped coordinate the emergency response. "It was absolutely a plane, and I'll tell you why," says Kilsheimer, CEO of KCE Structural Engineers PC, Washington, D.C. "I saw the marks of the plane wing on the face of the building. I picked up parts of the plane with the airline markings on them. I held in my hand the tail section of the plane, and I found the black box." Kilsheimer's eyewitness account is backed up by photos of plane wreckage inside and outside the building. Kilsheimer adds: "I held parts of uniforms from crew members in my hands, including body parts. Okay?
ima dokaz od avion pa sega imalo raketa:vozbud: pa imalo crna kutija

ovakvi fotosopi neizlevaat a na sslikata se gleda i deka se e sprzeno GORENJE ne eksplozija...ama toa velat 911truth!!!!!

"A blast-resistant window must be designed to resist a force significantly higher than a hurricane that's hitting instantaneously,"-so STO UDAR drvo...kamen od ulicata:vozbud:
 
Член од
14 декември 2007
Мислења
3.271
Поени од реакции
708
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Sans-serif,sans-serif][SIZE=+2]Hijacking Catastrophe - 9/11[/SIZE][/FONT][FONT=Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Sans-serif,sans-serif][SIZE=+2]
Fear & the Selling of American Empire[/SIZE][/FONT]

[FONT=Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Sans-serif,sans-serif]You can get this DVD for a minimum donation of $20.
[/FONT][FONT=Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Sans-serif,sans-serif][SIZE=+1]GET IT HERE![/SIZE][/FONT][FONT=Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Sans-serif,sans-serif][SIZE=+1] [/SIZE][/FONT][FONT=Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Sans-serif,sans-serif][SIZE=+1]Click here to visit our new shop![/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Sans-serif,sans-serif]The 9/11 terror attacks continue to send shock waves through the American political system. Continuing fears about American vulnerability alternate with images of American military prowess and patriotic bravado in a transformed media landscape charged with emotion and starved for information. The result is that we have had little detailed debate about the radical turn US policy has taken since 9/11.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Sans-serif,sans-serif]Hijacking Catastrophe: 9/11, Fear & the Selling of American Empire examines how a radical fringe of the Republican Party has used the trauma of the 9/11 terror attacks to advance a pre-existing agenda to radically transform American foreign policy while rolling back civil liberties and social programs at home.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Sans-serif,sans-serif]The documentary places the Bush Administration's false justifications for war in Iraq within the larger context of a two-decade struggle by neoconservatives to dramatically increase military spending in the wake of the Cold War, and to expand American power globally by means of military force.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Sans-serif,sans-serif]At the same time, the documentary argues that the Bush Administration has sold this radical and controversial plan for aggressive American military intervention by deliberately manipulating intelligence, political imagery, and the fears of the American people after 9/11.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Sans-serif,sans-serif]Narrated by Julian Bond, Hijacking Catastrophe features interviews with more than twenty prominent political observers, including Pentagon whistleblower Lt. Colonel Karen Kwiatkowski, who witnessed first-hand how the Bush Administration set up a sophisticated propaganda operation to link the anxieties generated by 9/11 to a pre-existing foreign policy agenda that included a preemptive war on Iraq.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Sans-serif,sans-serif]Joining Kwiatkowski in a wide-ranging, accessible, and ultimately empowering analysis of American foreign policy, media manipulation, and their global and domestic implications, are former Chief UN Weapons Inspector Scott Ritter, former Pentagon analyst Daniel Ellsberg, Nobel Peace Prize Laureate Jody Williams, author Norman Mailer, MIT professor Noam Chomsky, Code Pink founder Medea Benjamin, defense policy analyst William Hartung, author Chalmers Johnson, and Army Special Forces Master Sergeant Stan Goff (Ret.).[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Sans-serif,sans-serif]At its core, the film places the deceptions of the Bush Administration within the larger frame of questions seldom posed in the mainstream: What, exactly, is the agenda that drove the administration's pre-war deceptions? How is 9/11 being used to sell this agenda? And what are the stakes for America, Americans, and the world if this agenda succeeds in being fully implemented during a second Bush term?[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Sans-serif,sans-serif]INTERVIEWS INCLUDE:[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Sans-serif,sans-serif]Tariq Ali | Benjamin Barber | Medea Benjamin | Noam Chomsky | Kevin Danaher | Mark Danner | Shadia Drury | Michael Dyson | Daniel Ellsberg | Michael Franti | Stan Goff | William Hartung | Robert Jensen | Chalmers Johnson | Jackson Katz | Michael T. Klare | Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatkowski (Ret.) | Norman Mailer | Zia Mian | Mark Crispin Miller | Scott Ritter | Vandana Shiva | Norman Solomon | Greg Speeter | Fernando Suarez del Solar | Immanuel Wallerstein | Jody Williams | Max Wolff [/FONT]
 
Член од
14 декември 2007
Мислења
3.271
Поени од реакции
708
September clues



edna neobicna teorija koja mora da se pogledne i koja mi go odzede vnimanieto

Part A
Part B
Part C
Part D
Part E
Part F
Part G
Part H
Epilogue
 
T

tino097

Гостин
FACT: Blast expert Allyn E. Kilsheimer was the first structural engineer to arrive at the Pentagon after the crash and helped coordinate the emergency response. "It was absolutely a plane, and I'll tell you why," says Kilsheimer, CEO of KCE Structural Engineers PC, Washington, D.C. "I saw the marks of the plane wing on the face of the building. I picked up parts of the plane with the airline markings on them. I held in my hand the tail section of the plane, and I found the black box." Kilsheimer's eyewitness account is backed up by photos of plane wreckage inside and outside the building. Kilsheimer adds: "I held parts of uniforms from crew members in my hands, including body parts. Okay?
уште жими очите да речеше:vozbud:

и како спремни тоа униформите, колапс 9/11 на сликте.

И кога се тврди дека видеата се лага, кој гарантира дека сликите кои се презентират за вистина се тие, вистинските. парчето шо е сликано, во кој било аероклуб можи да се набави, од некоја макета :tapp::tapp::tapp:
 

Kajgana Shop

На врв Bottom