Bratot
Стоик и Машкртник!
- Член од
- 27 јануари 2007
- Мислења
- 17.089
- Поени од реакции
- 4.499
Опасни извори и институции
Иначе многу умешно успеа да ја изоставиш последната реченица во наводниот “извор“ која јасно и гласно вели:
The theory, however, commands little general support.
Mayani's thesis, relying chiefly on Albanian, claimed to have established some of the grammar, and enlarged the known vocabulary, of ancient Etruscan, taking as his starting-point that Etruscan was based on Illyrian, and that an Illyrian core survives in modern Albanian, quite apart from Albanian's borrowings from Latin and modern languages.
Арно ама Илирскиот “останал“ во употреба само во Албанскиот модерен..но не и во Етрускиот, ИГНОРИРАЈЌИ ги примесите во Албанските зборови со Латинско потекло како и од останатите понови јазици.
[SIZE=-1]"un des derniers grands problиmes du dјchiffrement des јcritures"[/SIZE]
Овој Захарија мнооггууу прочуен...
Негови ДЕЛА
Од истово негово дело :
.. само колку за споредба
И повеќе за овие теории гранде хехе:
Other theories about the Pelasgians
Иначе многу умешно успеа да ја изоставиш последната реченица во наводниот “извор“ која јасно и гласно вели:
The theory, however, commands little general support.
Mayani's thesis, relying chiefly on Albanian, claimed to have established some of the grammar, and enlarged the known vocabulary, of ancient Etruscan, taking as his starting-point that Etruscan was based on Illyrian, and that an Illyrian core survives in modern Albanian, quite apart from Albanian's borrowings from Latin and modern languages.
Арно ама Илирскиот “останал“ во употреба само во Албанскиот модерен..но не и во Етрускиот, ИГНОРИРАЈЌИ ги примесите во Албанските зборови со Латинско потекло како и од останатите понови јазици.
[SIZE=-1]"un des derniers grands problиmes du dјchiffrement des јcritures"[/SIZE]
Овој Захарија мнооггууу прочуен...
Негови ДЕЛА
Од истово негово дело :
.. само колку за споредба
И повеќе за овие теории гранде хехе:
Other theories about the Pelasgians
Inevitably a group of people, who are not clearly defined and whose language may be related to a linguistic isolate, will attract controversial theories. The ones known to me are briefly listed below:
1. A Proto-Latin languageThe Romanian scholar, Nicolae Densuşianu (1846 - 1911), considered the Pelasgian to be a Proto-Latin speaking people and, therefore, the ancestors of the Romanians; he considered Romanian not to be derived from the Vulgar Latin of the Roman Empire but from 'Proto-Latin'. In Dacia Preistorica he offered a translation of the Lemnos inscription. As far as I know, his views command little support outside of Romania.А сега истово што другарчето го постирало погоре ама ја ИЗОСТАВИЛО последната реченица, хехе што ќе му е бе
2. An ancient form of AlbanianThe French author Zacharie Mayani (1899 - ) has put forward a theory that links Etruscan to Albanian. This theory places Albanian (which is generally considered to be an IE derived langauge, probably a survival from the ancient Ilyrian IE) outside of the IE group of languages, sharing one branch with Etruscan and another with ancient Greek. (The latter language is also considered by nearly everyone else to belong to the IE group.)
Mayani's view is espoused by the Albanian poet, Nermin Vlora Falaschi, who has published a "translation" of the Lemnos stele in accordance with this theory. This "translation" and the other evidence she adduces in support of the theory may be found in L'Etrusco lingua viva (Antiche Civilitа Mediterranee - II, Bardi Editore, Roma 1989). This point of view is also supported by Robert d'Angјly, Giuseppe Catapano, Matthieu Aref and one or two others. The theory, however, commands little general support.
3. A lost Indo-European languageIn the1950s a theory was widely propagated by A. J. van Windekens (see Le pјlasgique, Louvain,1952) and others that identified the Pelasgians with IE-speaking settlers who occupied the northern Aegean region before the arrival of the Greeks. The proponents of this theory purported to have reconstructed an IE derived language, with a consonantal sound shift similar to that found in the Germanic languages and in Armenian. In 1965 D.A. Hester made a comprehensive review of the claims of this theory in an article "'Pelasgian' - A New Indo-European Language?" (Lingua 13, 1965, pages 338 - 384), and clearly showed how unsound it was. The theory now commands little support.4. An ancient form of GreekThere are those who hold that the Pelasgians were Helenes and thius the direct ancestors of the Greek tribes of antiquity. This theory seems to have risen to counter-act the claims of Albanias, Romanians and others to be descended from the Pelasgians. As far as I know, there has been no attempt to translate the Lemnos inscription as "Proto-Greek."5. A Turkic languageA Turkish scholar, Polat Kaya, has recently offered a "translation;" of the Lemnian inscription, based on his theory that the language is related to Turkish. Most scholars believe that at the time of the inscription (6th century BCE) the Turkic peoples were several thousand miles away in southern Siberia, and did not begin to migrate eastwards till about 300 CE. Kaya, however, identifies Scythians as Turkic peoples, thus putting Turkic peoples in Black Sea area at a much earlier date. His theory commands very little support.6. A Caucasian off-shootSome Georgian scholars, such as M.G. Tseretheli, R.V. Gordeziani, M. Abdushelishvili and Dr Zviad Gamasakhurdia, connect the Pelasgians with the Ibero-Caucasian cultures of the prehistoric Caucasus. This has some plausibilty in that some have seen connexions between pre-IE languages of Asia Minor, such as Hattic, with the languages of the Caucasus. But the evidence is far from certain. As far as I know, no "translation" of the Lemnian stele has been claimed on the basis of Georgian.