Грција се знае дека има умешано прсти во 2001ва, не мора документ да има за тоа иако добро би било да има. На неа таков конфликт најмногу и одговара.
Што се однесува до источниот душман, има документ во кој се наведуваат насоките за дипломатите и разузнувачите да собираат информации. Покрај точките за владината корупција во Бугарија, организираниот криминал, владеењето на првото и целото друго ѓубре во таа држава, се спомнуваат и намерите кон Македонија и Косово. Интересно е дека има посебен дел за слабостите на Бугарија спрема Русија.
Details about disputes with neighbors. Relations with, and military deployments in, the Balkans. Plans and efforts to promote democracy in Eastern Europe and the Balkans. Plans and efforts regarding Macedonia and Kosovo. Policies, plans, and efforts regarding Ballistic Missile Defense.
CLINTON[/B]
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/us-embassy-cables-documents/212446
Јас на твое место не би го базирал обвинението на една реченица во целиот текст. Реченица во која не се споменува каков план и каков труд. А додуша не би ме зачудило со оглед дека Македонија, Косово и Босна се црни дупки на балканот. Така да не би рекол душман бугарија додека не прочитам што точно планираат. А тоа дека имаат планови за соседите нормално е да се има стратегија за соседот бидејќи ти е сосед ако гори кај него ќе се запали и кај тебе .
Исто така од каде обвинението за Грција и нејзиното мешање прсти во 2001 ?
Текст некаде?
Edit:
Многу важен дел од текстот кој е испуштен . Ми делува како да се спремаат да го јавнат балканот под контрола ако населението се побуни или да ја јавнат турција под контрола со оглед дека дава отказ .
D. National Security
1) GRPO can provide text of this issue and related requirements.
2) North Atlantic Treaty Organization (FMCC-4H). Plans, efforts, and ability to maintain defense spending for force modernization, North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) interoperability, meeting NATO-required spending levels and force goals, and defense capability initiative implementation.
Strategy and efforts to win public support for such spending. Plans and efforts to fulfill commitments to NATO, including manpower and equipment for out-of-area operations. Actions to accommodate NATO procedures and methods. Government and public confidence in NATO Article 5 security guarantees. Attitudes toward stationing or long-term deployment of NATO or US forces on Bulgarian soil, NATO commands in Bulgaria, and out-of-country deployments of Bulgarian forces. Plans and efforts regarding NATO enlargement, including strategic concepts and future roles of the alliance. Government, including military, intelligence, and security service willingness, ability, and efforts to protect US and NATO classified information. Awareness of and concern about foreign penetration. Implementation and strengthening of personnel-vetting procedures. Policies, plans, and efforts regarding EU defense and security cooperation, including ESDP; views and intentions regarding any conflict between ESDP and NATO obligations.
3) Force Structure, Modernization, and Readiness (FMCC-4H). Details about threat assessment, including agreement and disagreement among civilian and military leaders. Perceptions about, and response to, cyber warfare threat. Plans and efforts to support or oppose US objectives in Afghanistan, Iraq, and elsewhere. Willingness and capability to participate in NATO, EU, and other multilateral relationships, including out-of-area operations, multinational peacekeeping force in Southeast Europe, and humanitarian and peacekeeping operations. Policies and efforts regarding access, overflight, and transit of US military forces and equipment. Disposition, readiness, and mission of military forces. Plans and efforts regarding force structure, military reform, and modernization, including future roles, strengths, and compositions of military services. Details about military cooperation with other nations. Details about defense industry, including plans and efforts to cooperate with foreign nations and actors. Weapon system development programs, firms, and facilities. Types, production rates, and factory markings of major weapon systems. Decisionmaking regarding acquisition of US or other nation weapon systems. Military and paramilitary manpower, structure, budget and expenditure by service and function, mission, doctrine, tactics, order of battle, command and control, equipment, maintenance, training, exercise participation, support for international peacekeeping operations, professionalism, non-commissioned officer development, health care, pay, housing, loyalty, and morale. Civil-military relations.
Offensive and defensive cyber warfare policies, plans, efforts, and capabilities. Indications of national-level denial and deception program, including doctrine, targets, goals, organizations, and activities. Location, mission, organization, associated personnel, funding, development, and use of underground facilities and other hardened structures, including for protection of command and control networks, civil and military leaders, and critical resources. Details about, and transfer of, advanced engineering techniques to harden key facilities, including by use of specialty concretes. Details about dual use of underground civil infrastructure. Plans and efforts to help other states develop underground facilities and other hardened structures.
