David Icke

  • Креатор на темата Креатор на темата firewall
  • Време на започнување Време на започнување
david icke
by Alex Burns (alex@disinfo.com) - December 16, 2000

Princess Diana and JFK were both ritually assassinated. The Earth is hollow, and secretly ruled by the Secret Reptilian Brotherhood from Alpha Draconis (or was it the Fourth Dimension?), who regularly practice ritual Satanic murder and child molestation. Francis Bacon was Shakespeare; Jesus Christ never existed; Queen Elizabeth and Prince Charles are shapeshifters who assert world control through a vast international banking network. The Disinformation editor's cute little brown chicken is now alien property. Welcome to the strange twilight world of David Icke, best-selling conspiriology author and one of the most controversial public speakers on Earth today. Through a series of books, most notably 'The Biggest Secret: The Book That Will Change The World' (Bridge Of Love Publications, 1999), '. . .And The Truth Shall Set You Free' (Truth Seeker, 1998), and 'The Robot's Rebellion: The Story Of The Spiritual Renaissance' (Gill & Macmillan Publishers, 1994), Icke lays out a conspiriology 'grand narrative' that involves every major conspiracy theory and occult society that ever existed, an alternative view of history which Icke contends has been kept from the majority of the human race. This worldview was parodied by Robert Shea and Robert Anton Wilson in their famous 'Illuminatus! Trilogy' (Dell Publishing Company, 1975), but Icke is deadly serious about his model, and continues to attract a devoted following.
Read as fictional metaphor, Icke's books are a paranoid roller-coaster ride through Humanity's eternal struggle to consciously evolve from primitive and violent deep-brain subsystems to whole-Earth macro-views. But unfortunately many readers are confusing the map with the territory, resulting in the 'information overload' that semiotician Umberto Eco wryly warned about in his masterful postmodern novel 'Foucault's Pendulum' (Picador, 1990).
Icke's biographical story offers ample examples of this common mistake of 'Seekers After Truth'. Professional soccer player, sports correspondent, and later national spokesperson for Britain's Green Party, Icke underwent a highly publicized spiritual awakening after a visit to a medium and healer. The brutal reality according to some conflicting accounts however, is that Icke got a personal assistant pregnant whilst on holiday, and split with his family. The public outcry drove Icke into the very fringes of conspiriology subcultures.
According to a scathing review of 'The Biggest Secret' by the late Jim Keith, Icke lacks the finely honed analytical skills required to discriminate between credible and delusional sources. Whilst Icke does highlight in his own way the turbulence of the multi-polar Digital Age and the exploitative excesses of laissez-faire capitalism run amok, he also prints (plagiarizes?) the most bizarre anecdotes, without any sustained critique. His books are required reading to grasp the irrationalism and virtually nonexistant research methodologies that plagues the conspiriology underground, but for all the wrong reasons: Icke may awaken the desire for conscious evolution, but then provides an error-filled map. Only psychotics and shamans create their own realities.
Here's a revolutionary test designed to reshape your reality tunnel: get a private journal, and then read a David Icke book. Note your reactive feelings and thoughts. Then read Michael Shermer's 'Why People Believe Weird Things' (WH Freemason & Co, 1998) and Carl Sagan's 'Demon Haunted World (Ballantine Books, 1997). Note your reactive feelings and thoughts. The read an Icke book again. Note any perceptual changes and review your notes. Has your world subsequently become an awe-inspiring, more beautiful place?

Shortcut
www.armavirumque.org

To contact The New Criterion by email, write to:
letters@newcriterion.com.
To contact The New Criterion by mail, write to:
The New Criterion
900 Broadway
Suite 602
New York, New York 10003
USA

Blondgroll li synahaka[:vozbud:
Jan 31, 2008 07:04 AM
The fairy tale of fragility
by Stefan Beck

Eons ago, in a sepia-toned past that few can now recall, President George W. Bush (remember that guy?) spoke of the “soft bigotry of low expectations.” Well, it seems to have reared its soft, bigoted head once more, this time in the form of the media’s horrified responses to the Clinton Machine’s attacks on Barack Obama. John McWhorter, one of my favorite authors and commentators on race in America, has no patience for this sort of delicate treatment, as he makes clear in today’s New York Sun: There is a tacit sense that decent people would make an exception for him. Otherwise, why would so many think of it as news that the Clintons or anyone else would get nasty in trying to push past him? Let’s face facts: People see this commonplace phenomenon as news because of a tacit idea that as a black man, Mr. Obama should be treated with kid gloves.б Lawrence Bobo, professor of sociology at Harvard, gives it away comparing the Clintons’ attacks on Mr. Obama to, specifically, the Willie Horton ad and the 2000 vote count. That is, events traditionally classified as “racist”—as if Republicans have not sought to best Democrats in ways disconnected to race. Upon which the Swift-boat thing is germane. Mr. Bobo appends that to his list, too—but misses that the guiding theme is not racism but hardball. Welcome to reality: being judged by the content of our character means that we black people will not be exempt from hardball. We should not be seduced by the fantasy that we must pretend to be fragile. That’s McWhorter’s argument in a nutshell, but it’s worth reading the whole thing for an entertaining (though not, as they say, in a good way) digression about the credulity-straining inclusion of Duke Ellington in The Rest Is Noise, Alex Ross’s new “survey of twentieth-century classical music.” McWhorter’s column is required reading as we approach Super Tuesday, which is also Fat Tuesday, which means that, whatever the outcome, you can assuage your suffering or compound your relief with the help of the almighty Sazerac. Plan ahead, though: They don’t sell Peychaud’s Bitters at your corner store.
 
Jan 30, 2008 05:50 AM
Con jobs
by Stefan Beck

Today on Pajamas Media I consider the “odd allure of the conspiracy theory,” that is, why bright and dim people alike choose to believe preposterous things. It would take greater insight than I possess to say conclusively why some folks find it plausible that Satanic puppeteers manipulate most or all of world affairs. In any case, I’m less concerned with the causes than the consequences of wasting one’s time tearing threads from the curtain of sanity. Call it the human cost of nonsense: Many intelligent commentators have offered cogent explanations for the “paranoid style.” I can’t say enough for Daniel Pipes’s book, published a few years before 9/11, on the subject. A common refrain is that people seek order, an “invisible hand,” where there is none, but this problematically assumes two things: that there is no order in the conventional narrative of Islamic terrorists attacking the U.S., and that conspiracy buffs really believe every word of what they say about that narrative. I have a theory of my own, that these parallel narratives . . . offer the seductive consolation of heroism without risk. No less a personage than G.I. Joe once said, “Knowing is half the battle.” For the current generation of conspiracy-minded “investigators,” to consider the more lurid possibilities is to win the day. These YouTube gumshoes risk nothing by, for example, heckling the former national security advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski at the 92nd Street Y.
Read the whole thing, but don’t for a moment think that I’d shut these people up: They’re an object lesson, if not much else. Mark Steyn seems to agree, though he’s been insulted by David Icke, the lunatic whose very right to lunacy he defended.

Following my item below on Richard (Lucy) Warman declining to “allow” David Icke to speak, David Icke writes:

Hello Mark . . . saw your post. You’ll have to let me have your secret for knowing it all.


The way to protect freedom for everyone, you and me, is to unite in mutual respect—not resort to pathetic and oh so predictable “yawn,” “yawn” abuse.

In your own way you are as stuck in the box as Warman. It’s just a different box, that [sic] all.

Sad. I hoped you were bigger than that and diverse opinions could come together behind the banner of freedom for all. Clearly not.

David


Oh, come on, David, you don’t need me to let you into my secret for knowing it all. You’ve famously found the secret for knowing it all—the secret of the universe, the Illuminati and all the rest—and I entirely support your right to let everybody in on it in Britain, Canada and every jurisdiction on the planet. I’m with you all the way—on your right to say whatever you like. Likewise, I’m exercising my right to say that I’m personally skeptical that the Queen is a shape-shifting space lizard. That’s all.

As to whether the Clintons are shape-shifting space lizards, the evidence speaks for itself.


Jan 30, 2008 04:37 AM
TNC may be habit-forming
by Stefan Beck

The website of my old enemy, n+1, currently features—as a “back to school special,” no less—a ruminative or perhaps ruminant essay about the pros and cons of Adderall, a drug usually prescribed to help intractable children color more efficiently. The piece is by a senior at an unnamed “Ivy League university,” a transplant from the Bay Area to the East Coast. It isn’t exactly Sid and Nancy, but it makes for a pretty lively read. Most entertaining is this inscrutable passage

[In school] I met freshmen who had taken the SATs more than twice, who spoke three Asian languages, who began drinking coffee in middle school. “Things are different on the East Coast,” I told my mother on a cellphone from the campus Starbucks, where I was conspicuously reading the New Yorker and hoping to make friends. The kids of the East Coast intellectual guard had a whole culture of rituals and objectives by which to define themselves: anticipation of the LSATs, the New Criterion, cocaine.
Now, I’ve lived on the East and West Coasts, and I attended the college that one might call the drunken uncle in the flower bed of the Ivy League, but I can’t recall a single one of these parties where the Himalayas were hoovered up while somebody gave a dramatic reading of Theodore Dalrymple like Anthony Blanche doing The Waste Land in Brideshead Revisited. If this is some new trend that I’ve missed, I have a public service announcement of my own: Kids, please click here to subscribe.

Jan 28, 2008 05:13 PM
Welcome to Medieval Times
by Stefan Beck

Last year, Julian Gough wrote in Prospect that

western culture since the middle ages has overvalued the tragic and undervalued the comic. We think of tragedy as major, and comedy as minor. . . . The Booker prize leans toward the tragic. In 1984, Martin Amis reinvented Rabelais in his comic masterpiece Money. The best English novel of the 1980s, it didn’t even make the shortlist. Anita Brookner won that year, for Hotel du Lac, written, as the Observer put it, “with a beautiful grave formality.”
I couldn’t help seconding Gough’s complaint. There aren’t enough truly funny books. When the jacket copy or the blurbs promise “side-splitting fun” or “laugh-out-loud hijinks,” the best one can hope for is that the book will be slightly funnier than The Death of Ivan Ilych. Understanding that something is, from a technical standpoint, a joke, and being driven to helpless, bent-double laughter by it are very different things. At the moment I’m reading Tom Perrotta’s The Abstinence Teacher; I’m sad to report that, though Perrotta’s novel Election was the basis for one of my favorite movie comedies, his latest effort is squarely in the humor-by-numbers category.

Tod Wodicka’s preposterously titled All Shall Be Well; And All Shall Be Well; And All Manner of Things Shall Be Well, on the other hand, may be something to look forward to.

Mr. Wodicka might have delivered little more than an extended cheap shot if he merely lampooned the desperation with which his main character, Burt Hecker, a k a Eckbert Attquiet, craves the escapism of the Middle Ages. Certainly there is much humor in Burt and his quaint affectations, since he uses them so absurdly as a barrier between himself and the modern world
 
интервју со бритни спирс е подобро:salut::salut::salut::salut:
 
интервју со бритни спирс е подобро:salut::salut::salut::salut:

брат .. ја претеруеш ...
после 10минути одкако е поставен линкот коментираш дека веза нема ...
не е убаво ...и не е коректно од твоја страна твоето понашање на темиве у мистерии ....

конкретно овде се гледа ...
ни да погледнеш ни ништо даваш оцена?
како?
ако не те интересира зошто воопшто коментираш?
 
10 минути трае интервјуто.......

и си кажав мое мислење.....овој рогоња го срами името дејвид(коперфилд епоубедлив)
а и има диагноза медицинска како васета.

кое однесување е коректно дај кажи......аман....анкети ставање...

кукање по администратори/модератори
 
10 минути трае интервјуто.......

и си кажав мое мислење.....овој рогоња го срами името дејвид(коперфилд епоубедлив)
а и има диагноза медицинска како васета.

кое однесување е коректно дај кажи......аман....анкети ставање...

кукање по администратори/модератори

видеото е 13дела по 10мин ...
ни кукам ни ништо не се замарам ...
само ти ги читам постовиве на секоја тема на мистерии кое понашање го имаш ... и заклучокот е тој ...
премногу самобендисаност .. не си најпаметен ..
ако неможеш да погледнеш подалеку ПОИНАКУ и да малце Опен миндед да бидеш и да научиш да дискутираш со разбирање на другите незнам шо се замараш на мистерии .. како шо глеам ни те интересираат ни пак веруваш во нешто ...:toe:
 
Значи Давид Ицке, е непобиен човек, неговите размислувања се далеку од обичните луѓе, што и оние што се обидуваат да го исцртаат како лоша личност.
Реалноста на неговите гледања и размислувања е сосема праведна и може да се заклучи дека во иднина луѓето ќе бидат контролирани од страна на неколкумина кои ќе манипулираат со се околу нас.
 
Значи Давид Ицке, е непобиен човек, неговите размислувања се далеку од обичните луѓе, што и оние што се обидуваат да го исцртаат како лоша личност.
Реалноста на неговите гледања и размислувања е сосема праведна и може да се заклучи дека во иднина луѓето ќе бидат контролирани од страна на неколкумина кои ќе манипулираат со се околу нас.

па тоа е стремежот на глобализацијата ..
цел свет една фирма :toe:
 
KristinaVM е санкционирана поради навреди упатени кон членот RAYTHEON23 ако некој сака да и се придружи нека продолжи во нејзин стил и ќе си заработи бан.

Продолжете со дискусија.
 
10 минути трае интервјуто.......

и си кажав мое мислење.....овој рогоња го срами името дејвид(коперфилд епоубедлив)
а и има диагноза медицинска како васета.

кое однесување е коректно дај кажи......аман....анкети ставање...

кукање по администратори/модератори

Па кажи зашто не ти се допаѓаат неговите идеи...и немој километарски пост да пишуваш xD

Некои работи звучат без врска, ама некои работи ми се чинат логични и очигледни.
 
ова ли

Princess Diana and JFK were both ritually assassinated. The Earth is hollow, and secretly ruled by the Secret Reptilian Brotherhood from Alpha Draconis (or was it the Fourth Dimension?), who regularly practice ritual Satanic murder and child molestation. Francis Bacon was Shakespeare; Jesus Christ never existed; Queen Elizabeth and Prince Charles are shapeshifters who assert world control through a vast international banking network. The Disinformation editor's cute little brown chicken is now alien property. Welcome to the strange twilight world of David Icke, best-selling conspiriology author and one of the most controversial public speakers on Earth today. Through a series of books, most notably 'The Biggest Secret: The Book That Will Change The World' (Bridge Of Love Publications, 1999), '. . .And The Truth Shall Set You Free' (Truth Seeker, 1998), and 'The Robot's Rebellion: The Story Of The Spiritual Renaissance' (Gill & Macmillan Publishers, 1994), Icke lays out a conspiriology 'grand narrative' that involves every major conspiracy theory and occult society that ever existed, an alternative view of history which Icke contends has been kept from the majority of the human race. This worldview was parodied by Robert Shea and Robert Anton Wilson in their famous 'Illuminatus! Trilogy' (Dell Publishing Company, 1975), but Icke is deadly serious about his model, and continues to attract a devoted following.
Read as fictional metaphor, Icke's books are a paranoid roller-coaster ride through Humanity's eternal struggle to consciously evolve from primitive and violent deep-brain subsystems to whole-Earth macro-views. But unfortunately many readers are confusing the map with the territory, resulting in the 'information overload' that semiotician Umberto Eco wryly warned about in his masterful postmodern novel 'Foucault's Pendulum' (Picador, 1990).
Icke's biographical story offers ample examples of this common mistake of 'Seekers After Truth'. Professional soccer player, sports correspondent, and later national spokesperson for Britain's Green Party, Icke underwent a highly publicized spiritual awakening after a visit to a medium and healer.

или


дека светот е фирма дека ме контролираат некои непознати.....тоа го нема ни во готам сити
 
Според него кралицата на ВБ е гуштер..:vozbud:Од каде ваква идеја немам појма ..
А според другото што го зборува се согласувам...
 
Според него кралицата на ВБ е гуштер..:vozbud:Од каде ваква идеја немам појма ..
А според другото што го зборува се согласувам...

Тоа не е идеја тоа е вистина :)
Значи според него светот го вртат неколку фамилии кои се реинкарнираат во гуштери кои се дојдени од вселената односно се посебна раса.
Инаку за понатаму и за тоа како перат мозоци види ја темата за Нов светски поредок :)
Барај на google Pindar lizard!
 

Kajgana Shop

Back
На врв Bottom