Падот на империјата
- Креатор на темата jamajka
- Време на започнување
- Член од
- 14 август 2006
- Мислења
- 45.434
- Поени од реакции
- 84.786
Незнае он. Стар е и не ги сфаќа новите услови.Ако ова го плаши некој како Кисинџер, тогаш работите се навистина заебани.
Modern US Warmongering Is Scaring Henry Kissinger
Listen to a reading of this article:caityjohnstone.medium.com
jamajka
mode: Calm
- Член од
- 28 април 2007
- Мислења
- 19.577
- Поени од реакции
- 27.422
Ако не ти е ова иронија, би те советувал да гледаш некои интервјуа негови од последнава година. И после спореди тоа што го кажува он и тоа што го кажуваат официјалните политичари од западот.
Vanlok
deus ex machina
- Член од
- 30 мај 2009
- Мислења
- 26.538
- Поени од реакции
- 35.315
Hours before the letter was released, White House national security adviser Ned Price denied rumors that the administration asked for the delay.
More via The Epoch Times;
After OPEC+ on Oct. 5 decided to slash oil output by 2 million barrels per day, White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre told reporters aboard Air Force One that it was a “mistake” and accused the group of “aligning with Russia.”
Russia is one of the OPEC+ cartel’s 13 key members, along with Iraq, Iran, Kuwait, Venezuela, and more.
Responding to the criticism, Saudi Arabia’s foreign minister insisted OPEC’s decision was “purely” about maintaining a balance of supply and demand and limiting volatility in the oil markets.
Vanlok
deus ex machina
- Член од
- 30 мај 2009
- Мислења
- 26.538
- Поени од реакции
- 35.315
The All-Encompassingness of the U.S. Government’s Secret Global Police-State
https://theduran.com/the-all-encompassingness-of-the-u-s-governments-secret-global-police-state
The All-Encompassingness of the U.S. Government’s Secret Global Police-State
Eric Zuesse
The U.S. Government is controlled by its Deep State, America’s billionaires, whom their Government has been assisting, ever since 25 July 1945, to extract the world’s wealth by control of not only their ‘news’ media but the social ‘sciences’ — duping the public. They have thus been gradually taking control over, and replacing, international law that comes from the United Nations, replacing it by America’s own “rules-based international order,” which is controlled instead by America’s Government, so that now, rapidly, America’s international rules are replacing the U.N.’s international laws, and are imposing upon the entire planet the rules that America’s billionaires — both the liberal ones and the conservative ones — want to be imposed upon international relations. Finally, the U.N. itself has become weakened to such a point that it is only a talking-forum whose general assembly, of nearly 200 cowed nations, are threatened to vote, and do vote, under the constant shadow of the U.S. Government’s crushing ability to destroy the economy of any nation it wishes. This is how the U.S. Government gets its way, so that the U.N. is left as merely a shell, a talking-forum, and even that is becoming increasingly controlled by the U.S. Government, and therefore increasingly dysfunctional.
On 30 September 2021, the American Society of International Law headlined approvingly, “UNGA Adopts Resolution on Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia, and Intolerance” and announced that, “On September 22, 2021, the UN General Assembly, to commemorate the 20th anniversary of the adoption of the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action, adopted Resolution A/RES/76/1 ‘United against racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance.’” Unfortunately, however, the U.S. Government itself was rabidly opposed to that Resolution, as it always had been.
On 21 December 2021, Craig Murray headlined “Protecting the Nazis: The Extraordinary Vote of Ukraine and the USA”, and he quoted from the U.N. General Assembly’s report:
The Assembly next took up the report on “Elimination of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance”, containing two draft resolutions.
By a recorded vote of 130 in favour to 2 against (Ukraine, United States), with 49 abstentions, the Assembly then adopted draft resolution I, “Combating glorification of Nazism, neo‑Nazism and other practices that contribute to fuelling contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance”.
Even America’s vassal-nations (‘allies’) other than Ukraine wouldn’t vote along with the U.S. regime on that Resolution (shown in an earlier version here as a pdf) (but the U.N., in order to be dysfunctional, tries to make all its documents and records — especially recent ones — as difficult as possible for the general public to access, so those links might not function for you), in which the U.S. refused to condemn “racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance” and not merely (and it didn’t even so much as just MENTION) the fascist form of that, which is “nazism” — not at all, so as not to offend the U.S. regime’s many nazi international friends. As always before, the U.S. Government would not join virtually all of the rest of the world (all of it except for the 2014 U.S.-installed Ukrainian regime) in condemning “racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance.” The U.S. regime always — each time that such a Resolution had been proposed — said that to condemn nazism, even if nazism isn’t mentioned, would constitute a violation of the U.S. First Amendment’s ban against censorship, and so it’s a “free speech” issue in America. So, the U.S. Government can’t be against “racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance,” because everyone has a right to hate anyone for any reason, and this includes a right to exercise that hate, to do what such people as nazis do, so long as it’s within American laws (and America has no law against genocidal anti-Russian movements or actions — so, America has nothing against at least anti-Russian “racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance”). This U.N. Resolution urged all Governments to do everything “to fully commit themselves and to intensify their efforts for the elimination of all racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance,” but the U.S. and Ukrainian Governments (after Obama took over Ukraine in 2014) simply refused. The U.S. regime is as nazi as it can be, (without accepting Hitler’s anti-Semitism, of course) and at the core of it is (Hitler’s #2 obsession) hating Russians. And, on these occasions, Ukraine stood out, along with America, for its acceptance of “racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance.”
And then, on Wednesday 12 October 2022, the U.N. headlined “Ukraine: UN General Assembly demands Russia reverse course on ‘attempted illegal annexation’”, and reported that,
The UN General Assembly passed a resolution by a large majority on Wednesday, calling on countries not to recognise the four regions of Ukraine which Russia has claimed, following so-called referendums held late last month, and demanding that Moscow reverse course on its "attempted illegal annexation".
The results were 143 Member States in favour, with five voting against, and 35 abstentions. The countries who voted against were Belarus, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Nicaragua, Russia and Syria.
A majority of those countries abstaining were African nations, alongside China and India.
The countries that voted the way the U.S. regime demanded on this were America’s vassal-nations, which were: Afghanistan, Albania, Andorra, Angola, Antigua, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belgium, Belize, Benin, Bhutan, Bosnia, Botswana, Brazil, Brunei, Bulgaria, CaboVerde, Cambodia, Canada, Chad, Chile, Colombia, Comoros, Costa Rica, Cote d’Ivoire, Croatia, Cyprus, Czechia, D.R. Congo, Denmark, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, Estonia, Fiji, Finland, France, Gabon, Gambia, Georgia, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Grenada, Guatemala, Guinea, Guyana, Haiti, Hungary, Ireland, Indonesia, Iraq, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan, Kenya, Kiribati, Kuwait, Latvia, Lebanon, Liberia, Libya, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Madagascar, Malawi, Malaysia, Maldives, Malta, Marshall Islands, Mauritania, Mauritius, Mexico, Micronesia, Monaco, Montenegro, Morocco, Myanmar, Nauru, Nepal, Netherlands, New Zealand, Niger, Nigeria, N. Macedonia, Norway, Oman, Palau, Panama, Papua, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Republic of [South] Korea, Romania, Rwanda, St. Kitts, St. Lucia, Sgt. Vincent, Samoa, San Marino, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Serbia, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, Solomon Islands, Somalia, Spain, Surinam, Sweden, Switzerland, Timor-Este, Tonga, Trinidad, Tunisia, Tuvalu, Turkiye, Ukraine, UAR, UK, U.S., Uruguay, Vanuatu, Yemen, Zambia.
Those are the vassal-nations of America’s billionaires. It’s a large empire — the biggest in history, by far. All of them were demanding that the overwhelming majority of residents in each of the six former oblasts or states of the Ukrainian federation that wanted to join and seek the protection of Russia against the Ukrainian nazi rabidly racist anti-Russian U.S.-installed regime on Russia’s border — Ukraine — must be ignored and that the land on which those residents live must be vacated by them or else the current residents there must yet again be terrorized by the nazi Ukrainians as before (ever since Obama’s coup there in February 2014).
Russia had apparently urged there be anonymous voting on that Resolution so as to make impossible the U.S. Government’s retaliating against nations which would vote to accept those regions as being parts of Russia, but in a confusingly worded statement, the U.N. reported that Russia’s proposal was rejected. One might wonder what the result of the balloting would have been if the identities of each voter were not to be made public. How can a democracy, of any sort, NOT have anonymous voting — or at least an option to vote anonymously? Can any such vote be taken seriously as being democratic? Should it be considered to be democratic? This is Truman’s U.N., and very definitely NOT what had been the intention of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who had invented and named the U.N.
All of the U.S.-vassal-nations were demanding a violation of the U.N. Charter’s basic principle of the necessary self-determination of all people: Chapter 1, Article 1, part 2 states that the purpose of the U.N. Charter is: “To develop friendly relations among nations based on respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples, and to take other appropriate measures to strengthen universal peace.” UKRAINE’S U.S.-INSTALLED GOVERNMENT HAS CONSISTENTLY REJECTED THAT. If all of those U.S.-vassal-countries are now at war against Russia as the U.S. regime is in the battlefield of Ukraine, then Russia must have nothing further to do with them, nothing imported and nothing exported, to any of them. And, gradually, those vassal-nations will learn the cost to themselves of that policy, of ‘alliance’ with the world’s leading nazi nation: America.
Here are other ways in which the U.S. is the world’s leading dictatorship:
“How America’s dictatorship works”
“America Is One-Dollar-One-Vote, Not Really One-Person-One Vote.”
“Jimmy Carter Is Correct That the U.S. Is No Longer a Democracy”
“Politicians Don’t Actually Care What Voters Want”
“Is the U.S. actually a ‘police state’?”
“How the U.S. Government is controlled by its armaments firms”
“How the Billionaires Control American Elections”
“The Evilness of America’s Ruling Class”
https://theduran.com/the-all-encompassingness-of-the-u-s-governments-secret-global-police-state
The All-Encompassingness of the U.S. Government’s Secret Global Police-State
Eric Zuesse
The U.S. Government is controlled by its Deep State, America’s billionaires, whom their Government has been assisting, ever since 25 July 1945, to extract the world’s wealth by control of not only their ‘news’ media but the social ‘sciences’ — duping the public. They have thus been gradually taking control over, and replacing, international law that comes from the United Nations, replacing it by America’s own “rules-based international order,” which is controlled instead by America’s Government, so that now, rapidly, America’s international rules are replacing the U.N.’s international laws, and are imposing upon the entire planet the rules that America’s billionaires — both the liberal ones and the conservative ones — want to be imposed upon international relations. Finally, the U.N. itself has become weakened to such a point that it is only a talking-forum whose general assembly, of nearly 200 cowed nations, are threatened to vote, and do vote, under the constant shadow of the U.S. Government’s crushing ability to destroy the economy of any nation it wishes. This is how the U.S. Government gets its way, so that the U.N. is left as merely a shell, a talking-forum, and even that is becoming increasingly controlled by the U.S. Government, and therefore increasingly dysfunctional.
On 30 September 2021, the American Society of International Law headlined approvingly, “UNGA Adopts Resolution on Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia, and Intolerance” and announced that, “On September 22, 2021, the UN General Assembly, to commemorate the 20th anniversary of the adoption of the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action, adopted Resolution A/RES/76/1 ‘United against racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance.’” Unfortunately, however, the U.S. Government itself was rabidly opposed to that Resolution, as it always had been.
On 21 December 2021, Craig Murray headlined “Protecting the Nazis: The Extraordinary Vote of Ukraine and the USA”, and he quoted from the U.N. General Assembly’s report:
The Assembly next took up the report on “Elimination of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance”, containing two draft resolutions.
By a recorded vote of 130 in favour to 2 against (Ukraine, United States), with 49 abstentions, the Assembly then adopted draft resolution I, “Combating glorification of Nazism, neo‑Nazism and other practices that contribute to fuelling contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance”.
Even America’s vassal-nations (‘allies’) other than Ukraine wouldn’t vote along with the U.S. regime on that Resolution (shown in an earlier version here as a pdf) (but the U.N., in order to be dysfunctional, tries to make all its documents and records — especially recent ones — as difficult as possible for the general public to access, so those links might not function for you), in which the U.S. refused to condemn “racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance” and not merely (and it didn’t even so much as just MENTION) the fascist form of that, which is “nazism” — not at all, so as not to offend the U.S. regime’s many nazi international friends. As always before, the U.S. Government would not join virtually all of the rest of the world (all of it except for the 2014 U.S.-installed Ukrainian regime) in condemning “racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance.” The U.S. regime always — each time that such a Resolution had been proposed — said that to condemn nazism, even if nazism isn’t mentioned, would constitute a violation of the U.S. First Amendment’s ban against censorship, and so it’s a “free speech” issue in America. So, the U.S. Government can’t be against “racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance,” because everyone has a right to hate anyone for any reason, and this includes a right to exercise that hate, to do what such people as nazis do, so long as it’s within American laws (and America has no law against genocidal anti-Russian movements or actions — so, America has nothing against at least anti-Russian “racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance”). This U.N. Resolution urged all Governments to do everything “to fully commit themselves and to intensify their efforts for the elimination of all racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance,” but the U.S. and Ukrainian Governments (after Obama took over Ukraine in 2014) simply refused. The U.S. regime is as nazi as it can be, (without accepting Hitler’s anti-Semitism, of course) and at the core of it is (Hitler’s #2 obsession) hating Russians. And, on these occasions, Ukraine stood out, along with America, for its acceptance of “racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance.”
And then, on Wednesday 12 October 2022, the U.N. headlined “Ukraine: UN General Assembly demands Russia reverse course on ‘attempted illegal annexation’”, and reported that,
The UN General Assembly passed a resolution by a large majority on Wednesday, calling on countries not to recognise the four regions of Ukraine which Russia has claimed, following so-called referendums held late last month, and demanding that Moscow reverse course on its "attempted illegal annexation".
The results were 143 Member States in favour, with five voting against, and 35 abstentions. The countries who voted against were Belarus, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Nicaragua, Russia and Syria.
A majority of those countries abstaining were African nations, alongside China and India.
The countries that voted the way the U.S. regime demanded on this were America’s vassal-nations, which were: Afghanistan, Albania, Andorra, Angola, Antigua, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belgium, Belize, Benin, Bhutan, Bosnia, Botswana, Brazil, Brunei, Bulgaria, CaboVerde, Cambodia, Canada, Chad, Chile, Colombia, Comoros, Costa Rica, Cote d’Ivoire, Croatia, Cyprus, Czechia, D.R. Congo, Denmark, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, Estonia, Fiji, Finland, France, Gabon, Gambia, Georgia, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Grenada, Guatemala, Guinea, Guyana, Haiti, Hungary, Ireland, Indonesia, Iraq, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan, Kenya, Kiribati, Kuwait, Latvia, Lebanon, Liberia, Libya, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Madagascar, Malawi, Malaysia, Maldives, Malta, Marshall Islands, Mauritania, Mauritius, Mexico, Micronesia, Monaco, Montenegro, Morocco, Myanmar, Nauru, Nepal, Netherlands, New Zealand, Niger, Nigeria, N. Macedonia, Norway, Oman, Palau, Panama, Papua, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Republic of [South] Korea, Romania, Rwanda, St. Kitts, St. Lucia, Sgt. Vincent, Samoa, San Marino, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Serbia, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, Solomon Islands, Somalia, Spain, Surinam, Sweden, Switzerland, Timor-Este, Tonga, Trinidad, Tunisia, Tuvalu, Turkiye, Ukraine, UAR, UK, U.S., Uruguay, Vanuatu, Yemen, Zambia.
Those are the vassal-nations of America’s billionaires. It’s a large empire — the biggest in history, by far. All of them were demanding that the overwhelming majority of residents in each of the six former oblasts or states of the Ukrainian federation that wanted to join and seek the protection of Russia against the Ukrainian nazi rabidly racist anti-Russian U.S.-installed regime on Russia’s border — Ukraine — must be ignored and that the land on which those residents live must be vacated by them or else the current residents there must yet again be terrorized by the nazi Ukrainians as before (ever since Obama’s coup there in February 2014).
Russia had apparently urged there be anonymous voting on that Resolution so as to make impossible the U.S. Government’s retaliating against nations which would vote to accept those regions as being parts of Russia, but in a confusingly worded statement, the U.N. reported that Russia’s proposal was rejected. One might wonder what the result of the balloting would have been if the identities of each voter were not to be made public. How can a democracy, of any sort, NOT have anonymous voting — or at least an option to vote anonymously? Can any such vote be taken seriously as being democratic? Should it be considered to be democratic? This is Truman’s U.N., and very definitely NOT what had been the intention of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who had invented and named the U.N.
All of the U.S.-vassal-nations were demanding a violation of the U.N. Charter’s basic principle of the necessary self-determination of all people: Chapter 1, Article 1, part 2 states that the purpose of the U.N. Charter is: “To develop friendly relations among nations based on respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples, and to take other appropriate measures to strengthen universal peace.” UKRAINE’S U.S.-INSTALLED GOVERNMENT HAS CONSISTENTLY REJECTED THAT. If all of those U.S.-vassal-countries are now at war against Russia as the U.S. regime is in the battlefield of Ukraine, then Russia must have nothing further to do with them, nothing imported and nothing exported, to any of them. And, gradually, those vassal-nations will learn the cost to themselves of that policy, of ‘alliance’ with the world’s leading nazi nation: America.
Here are other ways in which the U.S. is the world’s leading dictatorship:
“How America’s dictatorship works”
“America Is One-Dollar-One-Vote, Not Really One-Person-One Vote.”
“Jimmy Carter Is Correct That the U.S. Is No Longer a Democracy”
“Politicians Don’t Actually Care What Voters Want”
“Is the U.S. actually a ‘police state’?”
“How the U.S. Government is controlled by its armaments firms”
“How the Billionaires Control American Elections”
“The Evilness of America’s Ruling Class”
Vanlok
deus ex machina
- Член од
- 30 мај 2009
- Мислења
- 26.538
- Поени од реакции
- 35.315
Violent crime in Chicago is out of control and has skyrocketed since the Black Lives Matter riots and progressive city officials calling to defund the police after the death of George Floyd in 2020. People are fleeing the liberal-run metro area, and there's also a surging corporate exodus.
The latest episode of violent crime isn't the weekly occurrence of dozens of people shot over the weekend but a video that surfaced on social media of a real-life scene that looks like one from the video game "Grand Theft Auto" on a Chicago highway where a man in a ski mask with a rifle hijacks a car.
Video emerged on social media this weekend of a man carjacking a driver while armed with a rifle on an expressway near downtown Chicago.
The footage shows three people running out of a car that was apparently involved in an auto accident along the outbound Dan Ryan Expressway just north of the Stevenson Expressway. Then one of them, wearing a black ski mask and toting a large weapon, tries to carjack passing vehicles. -- CWB Chicago
D
Deleted member 53418
Гостин
South China post и пар но нејм портали го објавиле пред 7 дена. Ова е истото како да кажеш дека Америка ја копира Кина бидејќи роверот има тркала или гасеници.Автоматски споено мислење:
Кој од кого крадеше технологија?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ePgJAqhXgY&ab_channel=WallStreetJournal многу добро објаснето кој до каде е.
a koj sakas da objavi? sigurno ke objavi nekoj sto znae ko kinezite sto znaat sto imaat i sto im ukrale a nema da objavat kradcite sto ocigledno pocnuvaat poleka da zaostanuvaat na mnogu polinja.
ps. south china morning post e hong kongski vesnik sega u sopstvenost na alibaba. ko sto znaete hong kong i alibaba go "obozavaat" rezimot vo kina.
tolku se neseriozni sto imaat kup nagradi i toa bas za protesitite u HK kade se protestirase protiv kina.
SCMP won 3 awards at the 2018 WAN-IFRA Asian Digital Media Event.[92] The paper won 11 awards the next year in the same contest[93] and in 2021, won 9 awards at WAN-IFRA's 20th Asian Media Awards competition.[94]
The newspaper won a 2019 Sigma Delta Chi Award in Informational Graphics for their coverage of the 2019 Hong Kong protests.[95] In 2020, SCMP won another Sigma Delta Chi award in the same category for their coverage of COVID-19.[96]
The paper won 23 awards at the Society for News Design's 2020 Best of Digital Design competition, including 3 on articles covering the Hong Kong protests.[97] The paper also won 4 gold medals at the 2020 Malofiej Awards, including 3 for their coverage of the Hong Kong protests.[98]
SCMP was announced as the winner of the Online News Association's 2020 General Excellence in Online Journalism award for large newsrooms.[99][100]
The newspaper won the grand prize at the 2020 Lorenzo Natali Media Awards for its report titled "“The ‘thin yellow line’ standing between Hong Kong police and protestors”.[101][102] The paper was also awarded the 2nd prize at the 2020 World Press Photo Digital Storytelling Contest in the shorts category for the same story.[103]
SCMP's piece titled "Hong Kong Protests: 100 days of protests rock Hong Kong" was an honoree at the 2020 Webby Awards for Best Individual Editorial Feature.[104] The paper won another Webby in 2021 for its video titled "China’s Rebel City – The Hong Kong Protests".[105]
Последно уредено:
Vanlok
deus ex machina
- Член од
- 30 мај 2009
- Мислења
- 26.538
- Поени од реакции
- 35.315
Поважна е суштината/содржината, отколку изворот. Овде има нов начин на механичко движење, веројатно заштитен со патент. Кинески пронајдок, кој Америте дефакто и дејуре го копирале... Глупави се споредбите на најнови откритија со механизми како тркала кои со векови се во употреба.
Ова е само уште еден пример за амерскиот exceptionalism или „исклучивост“ по нашки. За сите други важат американскиот "rules based international order", oсвен за Америте. Или во примеров: Кога некој друг копира - тоа е крадење, но кога САД копираат - тоа е следење на тековите на развојот, имплементирање на новитетите. Нормално е. Нели @Fenix955 ?
Ова е само уште еден пример за амерскиот exceptionalism или „исклучивост“ по нашки. За сите други важат американскиот "rules based international order", oсвен за Америте. Или во примеров: Кога некој друг копира - тоа е крадење, но кога САД копираат - тоа е следење на тековите на развојот, имплементирање на новитетите. Нормално е. Нели @Fenix955 ?
Vanlok
deus ex machina
- Член од
- 30 мај 2009
- Мислења
- 26.538
- Поени од реакции
- 35.315
Washington Attempts to Bully India into Cutting Ties with Russia | naked capitalism
The US tries to coerce New Delhi into scaling back trade with Russia even if it hurts the Indian economy.
Добра статија за Индија и притисокот што го трпи од САД за да ги прекине економските врски со Русија (нешто што САД го прават со сите држави во светот).
Но една од поголемите причини зошто го линкам ова е следниов коментар од читател: „Im just dying to watch biden say "Indian Foreign Affairs Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar"
Vanlok
deus ex machina
- Член од
- 30 мај 2009
- Мислења
- 26.538
- Поени од реакции
- 35.315
Turkey lashed out at Washington, going so far as to suggest the Untied States was to blame the blast. "Turkey’s interior minister accused the U.S. of being complicit in a recent bombing in the city of Istanbul on Sunday that left at least six people dead and dozens of others injured," The Hill reports.
The accusation was prompted by an official condolence statement from the US Embassy in Ankara. Interior Minister Suleyman Soylu in a dramatic press conference said that Turkey has rejected the condolence statement from Washington.
"I emphasize once again that we do not accept, and reject the condolences of the US Embassy," Soylu said, according to Turkish state media publication Anadolu Agency.
Soylu slammed the US statement as being akin to "a killer being first to show up at a crime scene." The allegation was hurled due to America's well known longtime support of Syrian Kurds, which form the core of the US-trained Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF). Ankara has long alleged that Washington is giving aid to "terrorists".
The hugely provocative Turkish reaction to the US condolence message came despite the White House saying it stands "shoulder-to-shoulder" with its NATO ally Turkey.
Turkey will likely hold this against NATO applicants Finland and Sweden as well, given it has been blocking their membership to the Western military alliance based on accusations that they harbor Kurdish terrorists and entities linked to the outlawed PKK.
www.aa.com.tr
thehill.com
The accusation was prompted by an official condolence statement from the US Embassy in Ankara. Interior Minister Suleyman Soylu in a dramatic press conference said that Turkey has rejected the condolence statement from Washington.
"I emphasize once again that we do not accept, and reject the condolences of the US Embassy," Soylu said, according to Turkish state media publication Anadolu Agency.
Soylu slammed the US statement as being akin to "a killer being first to show up at a crime scene." The allegation was hurled due to America's well known longtime support of Syrian Kurds, which form the core of the US-trained Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF). Ankara has long alleged that Washington is giving aid to "terrorists".
The hugely provocative Turkish reaction to the US condolence message came despite the White House saying it stands "shoulder-to-shoulder" with its NATO ally Turkey.
Turkey will likely hold this against NATO applicants Finland and Sweden as well, given it has been blocking their membership to the Western military alliance based on accusations that they harbor Kurdish terrorists and entities linked to the outlawed PKK.
Türkiye does not accept US condolence over Istanbul terrorist attack: Interior Minister Soylu
Explosion on Istiklal Avenue left 6 people dead, 81 injured; female suspect arrested - Anadolu Ajansı
www.aa.com.tr
Turkey alleges US complicity in deadly Istanbul bombing, rejects condolence statement
Turkey’s interior minister accused the U.S. of being complicit in a recent bombing in the city of Istanbul on Sunday that left at least six people dead and dozens of others injured. Interior …
thehill.com