9/11 Терористи или сепак не?

Кој ги урна кулите

  • Терористи

    Гласови: 130 20,7%
  • Американски владини структури

    Гласови: 410 65,4%
  • Појма немам

    Гласови: 87 13,9%

  • Вкупно гласачи
    627
R

RAYTHEON23

Гостин
абе ова е спам!!! рекламирање!!! сакам дискусија не трошењее време....обновете ја анкетата па да видиме после дискусијава како ке гласаат!!!!

и да нема трета опција:vozbud:

оти нема човек шо на форумов не го спомна зајтгејс...затоа веруваат во завери
 
Член од
14 декември 2007
Мислења
3.271
Поени од реакции
708
poveke od 640 Inzeneri i Arhitekti baraat povtorno pokrenuvanje na istragata za 9/11




Berkeley, CA, April 23, 2009 – More than 640 Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth) are calling for a new, independent investigation into the destruction of the World Trade Center high-rises. These building professionals cite evidence of explosive demolition at all three WTC high-rises on 9/11 and document the evidence at their website. Michael Heimbach, assistant director of the FBI's counterterrorism division, wrote that their claims and conclusion were "backed by thorough research and analysis."

AE911Truth will host exhibitor's information booth #2609 at this year's annual convention of the prestigious American Institute of Architects (AIA). The convention, with more than 800 exhibitors and more than 20,000 participating architects, will take place in San Francisco's Moscone Center, April 30-May 2.

This exhibition will be followed up on Saturday May 2nd with a dynamic multi-media presentation by AE911Truth founder Richard Gage, AIA. Mr Gage will cover the forensic evidence found at the crime scene as well as a review of the omissions in the official FEMA and NIST reports. Join AE911Truth at the Westin Market Street Hotel at 50 Third St. in San Francisco at 4:00 pm on Saturday for this thorough review of the myth-shattering information.
Time magazine acknowledged in 2006 that the 9/11 Truth movement was not a "fringe phenomenon," but "a mainstream political reality." As well, Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth petition signers have been encouraged by President Obama's promise to "restore science to its rightful place."

Join AE911Truth at booth #2609 to review the startling evidence not reported in the media or by agencies in charge of the investigations.
http://www.ae911truth.org/info/55



eve i video na youtube od Richard Gage

 
R

RAYTHEON23

Гостин
poveke od 640 Inzeneri i Arhitekti baraat povtorno pokrenuvanje na istragata za 9/11




Berkeley, CA, April 23, 2009 – More than 640 Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth) are calling for a new, independent investigation into the destruction of the World Trade Center high-rises. These building professionals cite evidence of explosive demolition at all three WTC high-rises on 9/11 and document the evidence at their website. Michael Heimbach, assistant director of the FBI's counterterrorism division, wrote that their claims and conclusion were "backed by thorough research and analysis."

AE911Truth will host exhibitor's information booth #2609 at this year's annual convention of the prestigious American Institute of Architects (AIA). The convention, with more than 800 exhibitors and more than 20,000 participating architects, will take place in San Francisco's Moscone Center, April 30-May 2.

This exhibition will be followed up on Saturday May 2nd with a dynamic multi-media presentation by AE911Truth founder Richard Gage, AIA. Mr Gage will cover the forensic evidence found at the crime scene as well as a review of the omissions in the official FEMA and NIST reports. Join AE911Truth at the Westin Market Street Hotel at 50 Third St. in San Francisco at 4:00 pm on Saturday for this thorough review of the myth-shattering information.
Time magazine acknowledged in 2006 that the 9/11 Truth movement was not a "fringe phenomenon," but "a mainstream political reality." As well, Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth petition signers have been encouraged by President Obama's promise to "restore science to its rightful place."

Join AE911Truth at booth #2609 to review the startling evidence not reported in the media or by agencies in charge of the investigations.
http://www.ae911truth.org/info/55
како повикуваат на индипендент кога знаеме декалобираат и сакаат да наметнат мислење:tapp::tapp:

значи гледаш сами признаваат од 9/11truth ЕГЗИБИЦИЈА!!!


последниот болд кажува се за оваа организација значи они не биле на терен не истражувале туку се комерцијала од нај (недокументарни)клипој:toe::helou:
 
Член од
14 декември 2007
Мислења
3.271
Поени од реакции
708
Danski Naucnik Niels Harrit objasnuva strucno deka Kulite ne se sruseni od Avioni


 
R

RAYTHEON23

Гостин
епа такви како него еднаш велат имало ТНТ...па поле НЕ било така имало ПЕТИН...:vozbud:

ама не бе истите потоа велат било РДЏ па Ц’.....

за потоа самите да изгорат пред вистината кога тврдат дека има термите(сличнона напалм но послабо) значи со огромна темперетура пореметување на структурата

а после велат од оган не може да се сруши зграда:vozbud:

тие се како соросоидите...и кај нас има експерти по видеа....
 
Член од
14 декември 2007
Мислења
3.271
Поени од реакции
708
BBC objavuva za rusenje na zgradata 7 (Salomon Brothers) pred da se srusi


ova e eden od najednostavnite dokazi i najakite dokazi protiv oficijalnata verzija na 9/11
 
R

RAYTHEON23

Гостин
оффф лелеее дискутирам ли...новинарски лапсус...ова е ЧДА:toe:

абе дајте факти ако не нема да дискутирам!!!!:helou:

епа такви како него еднаш велат имало ТНТ...па поле НЕ било така имало ПЕТИН...:vozbud:

ама не бе истите потоа велат било РДЏ па Ц’.....

за потоа самите да изгорат пред вистината кога тврдат дека има термите(сличнона напалм но послабо) значи со огромна темперетура пореметување на структурата

а
после велат од оган не може да се сруши зграда:vozbud:

тие се како соросоидите...и кај нас има експерти по видеа....
пази на болдот!!!!!!!

9/11truth е слично како црква НИЕ само ЈА ЗНАеМЕ ВИСТИНАТА:vozbud:
 
R

RAYTHEON23

Гостин
NOT CONVINSING...NOT DETALET ACCOUNT...

Илиии вртење накај 180 степени:kesa:

епа такви како него еднаш велат имало ТНТ...па поле НЕ било така имало ПЕТИН...:vozbud:

ама не бе истите потоа велат било РДЏ па Ц’.....

за потоа самите да изгорат пред вистината кога тврдат дека има термите(сличнона напалм но послабо) значи со огромна темперетура пореметување на структурата

а после велат од оган не може да се сруши зграда:vozbud:

тие се како соросоидите.
..и кај нас има експерти по видеа....
ОДГОВОР!!!

сакам дискусија...има препораки за клипој и ФИЛМОВИ значи таму овие работи...:toe:
 
R

RAYTHEON23

Гостин
CITAJTE FAKTI
Sega ke ti objasnam ne sum skrzav


Claim: Seismographs at Columbia University's Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory in Palisades, N.Y., 21 miles north of the WTC, recorded the events of 9/11. "The strongest jolts were all registered at the beginning of the collapses, well before falling debris struck the earth," reports the Web site WhatReallyHappened.com.

A columnist on Prisonplanet.com, a Web site run by radio talk show host Alex Jones, claims the seismic spikes (boxed area on Graph 1) are "indisputable proof that massive explosions brought down" the towers. The Web site says its findings are supported by two seismologists at the observatory, Won-Young Kim and Arthur Lerner-Lam. Each "sharp spike of short duration," says Prisonplanet.com, was consistent with a "demolition-style implosion."



Fine Lines: Revisionists say sharp spikes (graph 1, above) mean bombs toppled the WTC. Scientists disprove the claim with the more detailed graph 2 (below). (Seismograph readings by Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University: Won-Young Kim, senior research scientist; Arthur Lerner-Lam, associate director; Mary Tobin, senior science writer)

FACT: "There is no scientific basis for the conclusion that explosions brought down the towers," Lerner-Lam tells PM. "That representation of our work is categorically incorrect and not in context."

The report issued by Lamont-Doherty includes various graphs showing the seismic readings produced by the planes crashing into the two towers as well as the later collapse of both buildings. WhatReallyHappened.com chooses to display only one graph (Graph 1), which shows the readings over a 30-minute time span.

On that graph, the 8- and 10-second collapses appear — misleadingly — as a pair of sudden spikes. Lamont-Doherty's 40-second plot of the same data (Graph 2) gives a much more detailed picture: The seismic waves — blue for the South Tower, red for the North Tower — start small and then escalate as the buildings rumble to the ground. Translation: no bombs.

WTC 7 Collapse
Claim: Seven hours after the two towers fell, the 47-story WTC 7 collapsed. According to 911review.org: "The video clearly shows that it was not a collapse subsequent to a fire, but rather a controlled demolition: amongst the Internet investigators, the jury is in on this one."


Fire Storm: WTC 7 stands amid the rubble of the recently collapsed Twin Towers. Damaged by falling debris, the building then endures a fire that rages for hours. Experts say this combination, not a demolition-style implosion, led to the roofline "kink" that signals WTC 7's progressive collapse. (Photograph by New York Office of Emergency Management)

FACT: Many conspiracy theorists point to FEMA's preliminary report, which said there was relatively light damage to WTC 7 prior to its collapse. With the benefit of more time and resources, NIST researchers now support the working hypothesis that WTC 7 was far more compromised by falling debris than the FEMA report indicated. "The most important thing we found was that there was, in fact, physical damage to the south face of building 7," NIST's Sunder tells PM. "On about a third of the face to the center and to the bottom — approximately 10 stories — about 25 percent of the depth of the building was scooped out." NIST also discovered previously undocumented damage to WTC 7's upper stories and its southwest corner.

NIST investigators believe a combination of intense fire and severe structural damage contributed to the collapse, though assigning the exact proportion requires more research. But NIST's analysis suggests the fall of WTC 7 was an example of "progressive collapse," a process in which the failure of parts of a structure ultimately creates strains that cause the entire building to come down. Videos of the fall of WTC 7 show cracks, or "kinks," in the building's facade just before the two penthouses disappeared into the structure, one after the other. The entire building fell in on itself, with the slumping east side of the structure pulling down the west side in a diagonal collapse.

According to NIST, there was one primary reason for the building's failure: In an unusual design, the columns near the visible kinks were carrying exceptionally large loads, roughly 2000 sq. Ft. Of floor area for each floor. "What our preliminary analysis has shown is that if you take out just one column on one of the lower floors," Sunder notes, "it could cause a vertical progression of collapse so that the entire section comes down."

There are two other possible contributing factors still under investigation: First, trusses on the fifth and seventh floors were designed to transfer loads from one set of columns to another. With columns on the south face apparently damaged, high stresses would likely have been communicated to columns on the building's other faces, thereby exceeding their load-bearing capacities.

Second, a fifth-floor fire burned for up to 7 hours. "There was no firefighting in WTC 7," Sunder says. Investigators believe the fire was fed by tanks of diesel fuel that many tenants used to run emergency generators. Most tanks throughout the building were fairly small, but a generator on the fifth floor was connected to a large tank in the basement via a pressurized line. Says Sunder: "Our current working hypothesis is that this pressurized line was supplying fuel [to the fire] for a long period of time."

WTC 7 might have withstood the physical damage it received, or the fire that burned for hours, but those combined factors — along with the building's unusual construction — were enough to set off the chain-reaction collapse.
__________________
ете:vozbud::vozbud:


видео ефтино со 0 одговори коменти....:pos2:

би се согласиле дека следењето шеми(pattern)) е слабост(предвидливост)

епа видете видеата како се конструирани!!!!!!!:pipi:
 

Kajgana Shop

На врв Bottom