D
Delux
Гостин
Ova amerikancite sekoja cest,sekoe gomno mozat da go prodadat za mnogu pari,a ostanatiot svet da se divi na toa
9/11 Терористи или сепак не?
- Креатор на темата exlexmk
- Време на започнување
R
RAYTHEON23
Гостин
чекај ти не разбираш изгледа .. нели документарци итн си гледал и ова мислење на 2пати го постираш како демек тоа е тоа ...
објасни ми ти кај се моторите на авионов у пентагон шо плесна ... од цел авион сакаш да кажеш се се стопило .. и се на се онаа дупка ја направил ?
НЕ ти од инат некеш да разбереш...сликите фотошоп па немале пристап па булшит ама знаеш ти што е 1700 степени и кажав за рушење на толкав објект ТРЕБА ЕКСПЛОЗИВ ВО ПОДЗЕМЈЕТО ВО ЦЕНТАРОТ...ПОТОА ПО СТРАНИТЕ И ТАКА НА СЕКОИ ТРИ КАТА ДУРИ И НА ПОКРИВОТ(ЗА ДА ОБЕЗБЕДИ ТАКОВ ПАД) И СЕКАКО НЕМА БАЈПРОДУКТИ ОД ЕКСПЛОЗИВИ А И ЕДВАЈ ДВЕ ФИРМИ(ПРОФЕСИНАЛНИ)СЕ СПОСОБНИ ДА НАПРАВАТ ТААКВО НЕШТО
ПРЕД ФАКТИ И БОГОВИ МОЛЧАТ ПРОЧИТАЈТЕ ПОНАЗАД ЗА ШТЕТАТА
- Член од
- 14 декември 2007
- Мислења
- 3.271
- Поени од реакции
- 708
Raytheon ..i malite deca znaat deka e ova "inside"job ne se praj maloumen na sila
pokraj milioni dokazi na net ajde zaprasaj se
kako moze ovie agencii CIA,NSA,Penthagon i uste milion drugi na slikive so seta taa dostapna tehonologija da ne mozat da najdat eden covek koj se krie vo pesteri so kalas
http://www.nerdylorrin.net/jerry/politics/Warrantless/NSA-HQbldg.jpg
http://static.huddler.com/imgrepo/8/89/CIA-LEED-building.jpg
http://www.triviaqueen.com/images/pentagon.gif
http://a.abcnews.com/images/International/nm_bin_laden_afghan_080630_mn.jpg
pokraj milioni dokazi na net ajde zaprasaj se
kako moze ovie agencii CIA,NSA,Penthagon i uste milion drugi na slikive so seta taa dostapna tehonologija da ne mozat da najdat eden covek koj se krie vo pesteri so kalas
http://www.nerdylorrin.net/jerry/politics/Warrantless/NSA-HQbldg.jpg
http://static.huddler.com/imgrepo/8/89/CIA-LEED-building.jpg
http://www.triviaqueen.com/images/pentagon.gif
http://a.abcnews.com/images/International/nm_bin_laden_afghan_080630_mn.jpg
Chombe_United
Да ми бричите ташаците!
- Член од
- 14 декември 2007
- Мислења
- 8.809
- Поени од реакции
- 452
R
RAYTHEON23
Гостин
во зајтгејст нема НИШТО ДОКУМЕНТИРАНО....А ЈАС ВИ ДАДОВ ФАКТИ ОД СТРУЧЊАЦИ
многу воа филмов перел мозок видовте дека економската штета е огромна потоа САД ако сакаат да нападнат ке си урнат авион па ке ги обвинат талибанците....логика ве молам навистина се трудам да ви ја покажам вистината.....ама тоа е ЕГО
многу воа филмов перел мозок видовте дека економската штета е огромна потоа САД ако сакаат да нападнат ке си урнат авион па ке ги обвинат талибанците....логика ве молам навистина се трудам да ви ја покажам вистината.....ама тоа е ЕГО
Не троши време. Ако не е на ТВ и не е на англиски не е точно.
Теориите на заговор се толку популарни бидејќи не го тераат човекот да мисли (кој има денес време за такви работи), туку еве некој друг мислел наместо тебе па ти само голтај.
R
RAYTHEON23
Гостин
па баш тие голтаат без да џвакат и арно викаш психолошки гледано станува збор за манипулација...па спореди документарец на хистори или нешнл географик....па после пропагандниот зајтгејст.
ја каќав треба на секои три ката експлозив(и тоа тони а во цајтгеист велат како тој од јавелин бил хахахах) па за после да нема докази...па како ке го постават експлозивот де незабележано и на пентагон има зрачење од осиромашениот ураниум(кој прави баласт на тежината)
а не ги фатиле па имало 4500 авиони од кои 3000 исти модели....ај следи ги и плус тоа кој муслиман ке го направи тоа знаејки однапред дека-не оди кај алах а и авганистан ке ГОРИ...во цајтгејс велат и нападите 93 на св.центар ПАК БИЛЕ ПЛАНИРАНИ ОД ЦИА-АМИ КАКО ТОГАШ НЕ УСПЕАЛЕ ДА УБИЈАТ ПОВЕКЕ ЛУГЕ ЗА ТОГАШ ДА ПОМИНЕ ЛЕГИСЛАТИВАТА ЗА ТЕРОРИЗАМ...
сепак ова е СРАМ за САД која во цутот на мокта си го доби.....
во цајтгејст повторуваат перат мозок(do you think that people from caves are able to do this......А ЗАБОРАВИЛЕ НЕШТО ПОТЦЕНУВАЊЕТО Е МАЈКА НА СИТЕ ПОРАЗИ.
исто и тезата за банкарите НЕ ДРЖИ бидејки во филмот се тврди дека банкарите и прават ЗЛО НА америка....
па едно прашање....ЗОШТО САД Е СВЕТСКА СИЛА ТЕХНОЛОШКИ РАЗВИЕНА ПРВА ПО ИНОВАЦИИ
пријателе ден браун рече дека измислувал во кодот на давинчи ама еве НЕКОИ ВЕРУВААТ ДЕКА ЦЕЛА КНИГА Е ВИСТИНА
експлозијата на КУРСК беше регистрирана во лондон....ако имало експлозив-организации универзитети ке ПРИМЕТЕЛЕ
не го нападнаа ирак за 9/11 туку поради неговата биохемиска програма
ја каќав треба на секои три ката експлозив(и тоа тони а во цајтгеист велат како тој од јавелин бил хахахах) па за после да нема докази...па како ке го постават експлозивот де незабележано и на пентагон има зрачење од осиромашениот ураниум(кој прави баласт на тежината)
а не ги фатиле па имало 4500 авиони од кои 3000 исти модели....ај следи ги и плус тоа кој муслиман ке го направи тоа знаејки однапред дека-не оди кај алах а и авганистан ке ГОРИ...во цајтгејс велат и нападите 93 на св.центар ПАК БИЛЕ ПЛАНИРАНИ ОД ЦИА-АМИ КАКО ТОГАШ НЕ УСПЕАЛЕ ДА УБИЈАТ ПОВЕКЕ ЛУГЕ ЗА ТОГАШ ДА ПОМИНЕ ЛЕГИСЛАТИВАТА ЗА ТЕРОРИЗАМ...
сепак ова е СРАМ за САД која во цутот на мокта си го доби.....
во цајтгејст повторуваат перат мозок(do you think that people from caves are able to do this......А ЗАБОРАВИЛЕ НЕШТО ПОТЦЕНУВАЊЕТО Е МАЈКА НА СИТЕ ПОРАЗИ.
исто и тезата за банкарите НЕ ДРЖИ бидејки во филмот се тврди дека банкарите и прават ЗЛО НА америка....
па едно прашање....ЗОШТО САД Е СВЕТСКА СИЛА ТЕХНОЛОШКИ РАЗВИЕНА ПРВА ПО ИНОВАЦИИ
пријателе ден браун рече дека измислувал во кодот на давинчи ама еве НЕКОИ ВЕРУВААТ ДЕКА ЦЕЛА КНИГА Е ВИСТИНА
Гледајте ја документарката Zeitgeist и се ќе ви е јасно, колку се наместени овие напади од УС владата
експлозијата на КУРСК беше регистрирана во лондон....ако имало експлозив-организации универзитети ке ПРИМЕТЕЛЕ
не го нападнаа ирак за 9/11 туку поради неговата биохемиска програма
Mlad_man
Sine Qua Non
- Член од
- 20 април 2007
- Мислења
- 3.475
- Поени од реакции
- 207
Сите документарци сум ги гледал и пак не може да ме убедат дека американската влада сакала да ги урне зградите. Како прво RAYTHEON23 даде еден добар факт за тоа, а јас ќе додадам уште неколку. Ако САД сакаа да влезат во Авганистан немаше да им треба причина и одобрување за тоа. Колку што се сеќавам во Србија кога дојдоа да бомбардираат никој не ги праша кој ви дозволи вас да бомбардирате и слично. И ден денес се случува истото. Пример во пакистан, пакистанската влада им забрани на САД да ги користат беспилотните летала и да бомбардираат терористички кампови, но САД си продолжи и еве сеа пакистан не им коментира ништо. Има многу вакви примери со кои ќе се покаже дека во историјата кога на САД им се сакало ќе си го направеле така да со ова не ме убедувате. Друга работа. Кај кулите близначки имало грешка во градбата затоа што во почетокот на изградбата во некои делови од зградата биле употребени материјали кои за време на изградбата биле прогласени за штетни и не можеле да се извадат после тоа што не значи дека сакале да ја срушат зградата туку барале начини како да се извади или спречи дејството па дури и било најдено. За скапо дали било не знам ама не верувам тоа да е поскапо од рушење на цел градски блок. Ај што се урнаа близначките тоа се 2 згради, се урна и целиот комплекс со екстра додатни згради од околината, а во нив спаѓала и зграда во која биле сместени ЦИА, ФБИ и некои други вакви агенции на САД и била специјално градена за нив со посебни спецификации кои и ден денес никој не знае со точност нешто за неа. А да не збориме за опремата што ја имале таму. Уште една причина со парите може да се спомне и метрото, еден од најосновните превозни средства таму. На граунд зиро поминувале најважните линии во цел град со нивното уривање морало да се пренасочи целиот сообраќај и со тоа се нанела многу поголема парична штета. Си има прецизно демолирање кое ќе си среди за се тоа и ќе си биде евтино. Сеа вие верујте што саката тоа е ваше секој си има мозок ама кога изнесувате факти тврдејќи едно прогуглајте и побарајте ги фактите што тврдат друго.
R
RAYTHEON23
Гостин
еве факти
за ирак
Iraq’s biological weapons programme since 1998
Iraq’s current BW capabilities are unknown. Compared to Iraq’s nuclear and chemical weapons programme, Iraq’s BW programme was the least understood and verified by UN inspectors by December 1998, although it is believed that Iraq probably retained some unknown quantity of BW agent (most likely anthrax) and growth media from before 1991. Aside from these uncertainties about Iraq’s past BW programme, Iraq possesses an industrial capability and knowledge base to produce agents quickly and in volume if desired. Moreover, Iraq has had a decade of experience countering intelligence
and developing effective concealment methods, and BW is probably the easiest of the WMD types to hide. Recent defectors from Iraq claim that the BW
programme is continuing. According to a former official of Iraq’s security and intelligence service, Iraq maintains a fleet of disguised refrigerator Renault
trucks, which have been converted to mobile biological production laboratories. (Interestingly, a senior Iraqi
official told UNSCOM that Iraq had once considered use of mobile BW production facilities). Another defector,
Adnan al-Maiden, who apparently worked as a civil engineer, says he was involved in constructing a number
of underground facilities that could be used for BW work. None of these accounts can be confirmed but
Western governments apparently take them seriously.
Iraq’s possible role in the autumn 2001 anthrax scare in the United States has also been a topic of speculation, based on the physical properties of the spores found. Bentonite, which was reportedly used in the production of the anthrax-laced letters, is an additive that Iraq has used for the microbial insecticide Bacillus thuringiensis.
The anthrax type used in the letters was apparently the Ames strain, which Iraq attempted to obtain from the UK in 1988. However, Iraq has not acknowledged that it possessed the Ames strain, and it used the Vollum strain for its weapons production. On balance, US authorities seem to regard as unlikely any Iraqi connection to the
anthrax letters, and they are apparently focusing their investigations on US citizens who might have access to anthrax through participation in the US BW defence programme. Another area of speculation is whether Iraq might have been able to obtain smallpox virus, which could be used to start an epidemic. Smallpox was endemic in Iraq
until the 1960s. The last acknowledged outbreak was in 1971 and ended in June 1972. The World Health Organization certified Iraq free of smallpox in April
1979. Despite the eradication, Iraq retained an interest in smallpox in the 198os, producing and testing vaccines, immunizing troops, and acquiring research papers concerning military use. Smallpox was included on a list of vaccines archived in 1991 at Central Military Medical Laboratory, Al-Rasheed Mifitary Hospital, in Baghdad.
Iraq also had a research interest in camelpox virus, a virus that is genetically very similar to smallpox, but not a human pathogen. Iraq has not, however, provided any details about its offensive work with camelpox virus. Iraq has a legitimate requirement for veterinary purposes to develop and produce animal pox vaccines but these projects currently are not monitored. Unless Iraq were able to preserve live smallpox virus from the early 1970s, the only known current stocks are in the
United States and Russia, and there is no confirmed information that these stocks have been compromised.
Since 1998, Iraq has continued to develop sites that were associated with its BW programme, notably at the
Foot and Mouth Disease Vaccine Plant at Daura which produced botulinum toxin and probably anthrax in late
1990. At Iraq’s request, the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) inspected the facility in May 2000
and recommended that renovations occur. In 2001 Iraq announced that it intended to renovate the facility and warned the US and UK against obstructing it. In the absence of inspections, the renovation work at this
facility goes unobserved, as does the use of retained industrial fermentation capacity capable of producing bacteria, bacterial toxins and viruses.
With its known civilian facilities, which were monitored by UNSCOM until 1998, Iraq retains a BW agent production capability equivalent to the design production capability of the 1990 Al-Hakam facility, which was on the order of a few thousand litres of agent weekly. Iraq also has the indigenous capability to design and manufacture the equipment required to produce and process biological warfare agents and their delivery means, and so does not need to import such equipment from overseas, much as it might desire superior equipment. Iraq produced fermenters and spray driers at the State Establishment for Heavy Engineering and at the Mechanical Engineering Design Department, Centre for
Engineering Design, Iraqi Atomic Energy Commission,
Tuwaitha, in the 1990s and no doubt still continues to do so. Without international inspectors, the opportunity exists to develop capability unconstrained. Iraq also retains its staff associated with the BW programme, with their expertise, experience and knowledge of all aspects of a biological weapons programme. The munitions evaluated by Iraq for BW purposes are available (aerial bombs, rockets, missile warheads)
Overall, however, it is unlikely that Iraq currently possesses an offensive CW capability comparable to its pre-1991 levels of thousands of tonnes of agent and tens of thousands of effective munitions. Iraq’s current CW capability probably comprises hundreds of tonnes of agent (presumably a mixture of mustard and nerve agent, probably sam/CF and perhaps VX). The military and political effectiveness of this agent stockpile depends on Iraq’s current delivery capability against tactical or strategic targets. Iraq’s tactical CW arsenal could include perhaps several thousand munitions, including artillery shells, short-range rockets and aerial bombs. Though much reduced from its 1990 inventory and vulnerable to opposing air forces, Iraq’s air force retains around 35 Su-22, Su-24 and Su-25 ground attack aircraft that could be used for tactical delivery of CW munitions. On balance, an arsenal of this size is insufficient for sustained offensive military operations and is unlikely to inflict militarily significant casualties on well-trained and well-equipped troops. Nonetheless, Iraq’s known ability to marry chemical warheads to its rocket and artillery pieces (with ranges up to 30,000
точно и БДП им падна за 0,5 посто се што имаше договори хартии од вредност изгоре вкупната ШТЕТА НА КРАТОК И СРЕДЕН РОК СЕ ПРОЦЕНУВА ОКОЛУ 20 МИЛИЈАРДИ ЕВРА.
за ирак
Iraq’s biological weapons programme since 1998
Iraq’s current BW capabilities are unknown. Compared to Iraq’s nuclear and chemical weapons programme, Iraq’s BW programme was the least understood and verified by UN inspectors by December 1998, although it is believed that Iraq probably retained some unknown quantity of BW agent (most likely anthrax) and growth media from before 1991. Aside from these uncertainties about Iraq’s past BW programme, Iraq possesses an industrial capability and knowledge base to produce agents quickly and in volume if desired. Moreover, Iraq has had a decade of experience countering intelligence
and developing effective concealment methods, and BW is probably the easiest of the WMD types to hide. Recent defectors from Iraq claim that the BW
programme is continuing. According to a former official of Iraq’s security and intelligence service, Iraq maintains a fleet of disguised refrigerator Renault
trucks, which have been converted to mobile biological production laboratories. (Interestingly, a senior Iraqi
official told UNSCOM that Iraq had once considered use of mobile BW production facilities). Another defector,
Adnan al-Maiden, who apparently worked as a civil engineer, says he was involved in constructing a number
of underground facilities that could be used for BW work. None of these accounts can be confirmed but
Western governments apparently take them seriously.
Iraq’s possible role in the autumn 2001 anthrax scare in the United States has also been a topic of speculation, based on the physical properties of the spores found. Bentonite, which was reportedly used in the production of the anthrax-laced letters, is an additive that Iraq has used for the microbial insecticide Bacillus thuringiensis.
The anthrax type used in the letters was apparently the Ames strain, which Iraq attempted to obtain from the UK in 1988. However, Iraq has not acknowledged that it possessed the Ames strain, and it used the Vollum strain for its weapons production. On balance, US authorities seem to regard as unlikely any Iraqi connection to the
anthrax letters, and they are apparently focusing their investigations on US citizens who might have access to anthrax through participation in the US BW defence programme. Another area of speculation is whether Iraq might have been able to obtain smallpox virus, which could be used to start an epidemic. Smallpox was endemic in Iraq
until the 1960s. The last acknowledged outbreak was in 1971 and ended in June 1972. The World Health Organization certified Iraq free of smallpox in April
1979. Despite the eradication, Iraq retained an interest in smallpox in the 198os, producing and testing vaccines, immunizing troops, and acquiring research papers concerning military use. Smallpox was included on a list of vaccines archived in 1991 at Central Military Medical Laboratory, Al-Rasheed Mifitary Hospital, in Baghdad.
Iraq also had a research interest in camelpox virus, a virus that is genetically very similar to smallpox, but not a human pathogen. Iraq has not, however, provided any details about its offensive work with camelpox virus. Iraq has a legitimate requirement for veterinary purposes to develop and produce animal pox vaccines but these projects currently are not monitored. Unless Iraq were able to preserve live smallpox virus from the early 1970s, the only known current stocks are in the
United States and Russia, and there is no confirmed information that these stocks have been compromised.
Since 1998, Iraq has continued to develop sites that were associated with its BW programme, notably at the
Foot and Mouth Disease Vaccine Plant at Daura which produced botulinum toxin and probably anthrax in late
1990. At Iraq’s request, the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) inspected the facility in May 2000
and recommended that renovations occur. In 2001 Iraq announced that it intended to renovate the facility and warned the US and UK against obstructing it. In the absence of inspections, the renovation work at this
facility goes unobserved, as does the use of retained industrial fermentation capacity capable of producing bacteria, bacterial toxins and viruses.
With its known civilian facilities, which were monitored by UNSCOM until 1998, Iraq retains a BW agent production capability equivalent to the design production capability of the 1990 Al-Hakam facility, which was on the order of a few thousand litres of agent weekly. Iraq also has the indigenous capability to design and manufacture the equipment required to produce and process biological warfare agents and their delivery means, and so does not need to import such equipment from overseas, much as it might desire superior equipment. Iraq produced fermenters and spray driers at the State Establishment for Heavy Engineering and at the Mechanical Engineering Design Department, Centre for
Engineering Design, Iraqi Atomic Energy Commission,
Tuwaitha, in the 1990s and no doubt still continues to do so. Without international inspectors, the opportunity exists to develop capability unconstrained. Iraq also retains its staff associated with the BW programme, with their expertise, experience and knowledge of all aspects of a biological weapons programme. The munitions evaluated by Iraq for BW purposes are available (aerial bombs, rockets, missile warheads)
Overall, however, it is unlikely that Iraq currently possesses an offensive CW capability comparable to its pre-1991 levels of thousands of tonnes of agent and tens of thousands of effective munitions. Iraq’s current CW capability probably comprises hundreds of tonnes of agent (presumably a mixture of mustard and nerve agent, probably sam/CF and perhaps VX). The military and political effectiveness of this agent stockpile depends on Iraq’s current delivery capability against tactical or strategic targets. Iraq’s tactical CW arsenal could include perhaps several thousand munitions, including artillery shells, short-range rockets and aerial bombs. Though much reduced from its 1990 inventory and vulnerable to opposing air forces, Iraq’s air force retains around 35 Su-22, Su-24 and Su-25 ground attack aircraft that could be used for tactical delivery of CW munitions. On balance, an arsenal of this size is insufficient for sustained offensive military operations and is unlikely to inflict militarily significant casualties on well-trained and well-equipped troops. Nonetheless, Iraq’s known ability to marry chemical warheads to its rocket and artillery pieces (with ranges up to 30,000
точно и БДП им падна за 0,5 посто се што имаше договори хартии од вредност изгоре вкупната ШТЕТА НА КРАТОК И СРЕДЕН РОК СЕ ПРОЦЕНУВА ОКОЛУ 20 МИЛИЈАРДИ ЕВРА.
- Член од
- 8 април 2008
- Мислења
- 6.419
- Поени од реакции
- 777
1700 степени а? и изгоре ЦЕЛ АВИОН ... АМА ЦЕЛ баш ЦЕЛ ... ме заебаваш?
и да биле поставувани експлозиви со месеци уназад ...
а сеуште ни ми кажа за зградата 7 ... како таа се сруши на ист начин како и кулите без да удри авион во неа и покрај тоа што беше потпалена он некои остатоци (ништо сериозно) а сепак била може да се рече блиндирана поради тоа шо во неа имало канцеларии и центри на многу внатрешни амерички агенции како ЦИА, Кризен центар, и многу други ...(види го клипот) ... има многу експерти од другата страна исто така ...
паѓаат до доле вертикално до самиот центар без да се прекршат настрана (и двете Кули и зградата 7 !??!?!?) до самиот темел ?!?! колку е тоа случајно за да биде случајно?
R
RAYTHEON23
Гостин
а ти не читаш еве за зграда 7 обрни внимание
Steel loses about 50 percent of its strength at 1100°F," notes senior engineer Farid Alfawak-hiri of the American Institute of Steel Construction. "And at 1800° it is probably at less than 10 percent." NIST also believes that a great deal of the spray-on fireproofing insulation was likely knocked off the steel beams that were in the path of the crashing jets, leaving the metal more vulnerable to the heat.
FACT: Once each tower began to collapse, the weight of all the floors above the collapsed zone bore down with pulverizing force on the highest intact floor. Unable to absorb the massive energy, that floor would fail, transmitting the forces to the floor below, allowing the collapse to progress downward through the building in a chain reaction. Engineers call the process "pancaking," and it does not require an explosion to begin, according to David Biggs, a structural engineer at Ryan-Biggs Associates and a member of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) team that worked on the FEMA report. пази тука при контролирана експлозија првен подземјето експлодира па нагоре а овде читај!!!!!!! и ти кажав сеизмички бран нема од експлозив
Like all office buildings, the WTC towers contained a huge volume of air. As they pancaked, all that air — along with the concrete and other debris pulverized by the force of the collapse — was ejected with enormous energy
But jet fuel wasn't the only thing burning, notes Forman Williams, a professor of engineering at the University of California, San Diego, and one of seven structural engineers and fire experts that PM consulted. He says that while the jet fuel was the catalyst for the WTC fires, the resulting inferno was intensified by the combustible material inside the buildings, including rugs, curtains, furniture and paper. NIST reports that pockets of fire hit 1832°F.
"The jet fuel was the ignition source," Williams tells PM. "It burned for maybe 10 minutes, and [the towers] were still standing in 10 minutes. It was the rest of the stuff burning afterward that was responsible for the heat transfer that eventually brought them down."
ЕВЕ 7матаFACT: Many conspiracy theorists point to FEMA's preliminary report, which said there was relatively light damage to WTC 7 prior to its collapse. With the benefit of more time and resources, NIST researchers now support the working hypothesis that WTC 7 was far more compromised by falling debris than the FEMA report indicated. "The most important thing we found was that there was, in fact, physical damage to the south face of building 7," NIST's Sunder tells PM. "On about a third of the face to the center and to the bottom — approximately 10 stories — about 25 percent of the depth of the building was scooped out." NIST also discovered previously undocumented damage to WTC 7's upper stories and its southwest corner.
NIST investigators believe a combination of intense fire and severe structural damage contributed to the collapse, though assigning the exact proportion requires more research. But NIST's analysis suggests the fall of WTC 7 was an example of "progressive collapse," a process in which the failure of parts of a structure ultimately creates strains that cause the entire building to come down. Videos of the fall of WTC 7 show cracks, or "kinks," in the building's facade just before the two penthouses disappeared into the structure, one after the other. The entire building fell in on itself, with the slumping east side of the structure pulling down the west side in a diagonal collapse.
According to NIST, there was one primary reason for the building's failure: In an unusual design, the columns near the visible kinks were carrying exceptionally large loads, roughly 2000 sq. Ft. Of floor area for each floor. "What our preliminary analysis has shown is that if you take out just one column on one of the lower floors," Sunder notes, "it could cause a vertical progression of collapse so that the entire section comes down."
There are two other possible contributing factors still under investigation: First, trusses on the fifth and seventh floors were designed to transfer loads from one set of columns to another. With columns on the south face apparently damaged, high stresses would likely have been communicated to columns on the building's other faces, thereby exceeding their load-bearing capacities.
Second, a fifth-floor fire burned for up to 7 hours. "There was no firefighting in WTC 7," Sunder says. Investigators believe the fire was fed by tanks of diesel fuel that many tenants used to run emergency generators.
WTC 7 might have withstood the physical damage it received, or the fire that burned for hours, but those combined factors — along with the building's unusual construction — were enough to set off the chain-reaction collapse.
НАЈУВАЖНО ПАЗИ ЕВЕ ГИ СЕИЗМИЧКИТЕ ПОДАТОЦИ
On that graph, the 8- and 10-second collapses appear — misleadingly — as a pair of sudden spikes. Lamont-Doherty's 40-second plot of the same data (Graph 2) gives a much more detailed picture: The seismic waves — blue for the South Tower, red for the North Tower — start small and then escalate as the buildings rumble to the ground. Translation: NO BOMBS.
не веруј на видео кое е направено туку така САД се светска сила а банкарите ги кочат....ахахахахах има во економијата монетарна теорија(од економистот милтон фридман-нобеловец)
овој филм е правен за да ги манипулира глупите американци.....СЕГА ЦЕЛА ШТЕТА
200 000 загубени работни места
The September 11 attacks inflicted casualties and material damages on a far greater scale than any other terrorist aggression in recent history. Lower Manhattan lost approximately 30 percent of its office space and a number of businesses ceased to exist. Close to 200,000 jobs were destroyed or relocated out of New York City, at least temporarily. The destruction of physical assets was estimated in the national accounts to amount to $14 billion for private businesses, $1.5 billion for state and local government enterprises and $0.7 billion for federal enterprises. Rescue, cleanup and related costs have been estimated to amount to at least $11 billion for a total direct cost of $27.2 billion.
Immediate and Short Term Indirect Impacts
Immediately after the attacks, leading forecast services sharply revised downward their projections of economic activity. The consensus forecast for U.S. Real GDP growth was instantly downgraded by 0.5 percentage points for 2001 and 1.2 percentage points for 2002. The implied projected cumulative loss in national income through the end of 2003 amounted to 5 percentage points of annual GDP, or half a trillion dollars.(ГЛЕДАЈ ЗАГУБА ПОЛА ТРИЛИОН ЛОГИЧНО ТИ Е СЕГА!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
With production disrupted in some areas (airlines) and consumers increasingly cautious, real GDP shrank in the third quarter of 2001. But in the fourth quarter, demand held up better than initially feared, and GDP increased. However, private sector fixed investment registered a steep decline, and inventories were slashed. Offsetting these forces, however, were household consumption, helped by falling energy prices, and government spending. Defense spending in particular grew by about 9.25% in real terms in the fourth quarter, at a seasonally adjusted annual rate.
Some sectors or firms actually witnessed an increase in demand, notably in the area of security and information technology. Still, while overall demand proved fairly resilient, a number of sectors were hit hard, with declining output and profits continuing into the mid-term.
Overall however the short-term adverse economic impact of the attacks was far less than feared initially, thanks in large part to good economic crisis management. The Federal Reserve, the Administration and Congress acted quickly to restore confidence, inject liquidity and provide resources to deal with the consequences of the attacks. The Federal Reserve by lowering the price of credit and temporarily providing vast amounts of liquidity helped safeguard the integrity of the financial system and saved many firms from bankruptcy.(банкарите ги намалија каматите за да спречат банкрот)
Medium Term Impacts
Looking beyond the short term, the fact that the attack was premeditated and therefore could be repeated has had a significant impact on five main areas: (1) insurance; (2) airlines; (3) tourism and other industries associated with travel; (4) shipping; and (5) increased defense/security expenditures. In turn, developments in these areas have had a broader effect on wide areas of economic activity.
Insurance. The losses from the terrorist attacks for the insurance industry (including reinsurance) are estimated at between $30 and $58 billion with the main uncertainty concerning liability insurance. By comparison the losses associated with Hurricane Andrew's 1992 damage in Florida came to around $21 billion. Even if the final cost is close to the lower estimate, insured losses in 2001 are likely to have been the highest ever.
Following the attacks, most primary insurers have increased their premiums and curtailed or dropped altogether coverage for terrorism-related risk. The increases in insurance premiums have adversely affected several key industries. The strongest impact has been on aviation, but other sectors, including transportation, construction, and tourism and energy generation have also been affected. Overall it is estimated that commercial property and liability insurance rates have been raised by 30 percent on average.
Airlines. The United States' airline industry was already in a weak financial position before the attacks with rising debt ratios and falling returns on investment. Even with cutbacks in service of the order of 20 percent and significant government support, airline passenger traffic has apparently remained below normal, 100,000 layoffs have been announced and employment in October and November fell by 81,000 (almost 8 percent). Equity valuations compared to the overall market illustrate these difficulties. The U.S. Airline sector has lost around 20 percent of its relative value since September 10.
Tourism and Other Service Industries. Other industries have also been badly affected, such as hotels, tourism, automobile rentals, travel agents, and civilian aircraft manufactures.
прочитај убаво.
поздрав
Steel loses about 50 percent of its strength at 1100°F," notes senior engineer Farid Alfawak-hiri of the American Institute of Steel Construction. "And at 1800° it is probably at less than 10 percent." NIST also believes that a great deal of the spray-on fireproofing insulation was likely knocked off the steel beams that were in the path of the crashing jets, leaving the metal more vulnerable to the heat.
FACT: Once each tower began to collapse, the weight of all the floors above the collapsed zone bore down with pulverizing force on the highest intact floor. Unable to absorb the massive energy, that floor would fail, transmitting the forces to the floor below, allowing the collapse to progress downward through the building in a chain reaction. Engineers call the process "pancaking," and it does not require an explosion to begin, according to David Biggs, a structural engineer at Ryan-Biggs Associates and a member of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) team that worked on the FEMA report. пази тука при контролирана експлозија првен подземјето експлодира па нагоре а овде читај!!!!!!! и ти кажав сеизмички бран нема од експлозив
Like all office buildings, the WTC towers contained a huge volume of air. As they pancaked, all that air — along with the concrete and other debris pulverized by the force of the collapse — was ejected with enormous energy
But jet fuel wasn't the only thing burning, notes Forman Williams, a professor of engineering at the University of California, San Diego, and one of seven structural engineers and fire experts that PM consulted. He says that while the jet fuel was the catalyst for the WTC fires, the resulting inferno was intensified by the combustible material inside the buildings, including rugs, curtains, furniture and paper. NIST reports that pockets of fire hit 1832°F.
"The jet fuel was the ignition source," Williams tells PM. "It burned for maybe 10 minutes, and [the towers] were still standing in 10 minutes. It was the rest of the stuff burning afterward that was responsible for the heat transfer that eventually brought them down."
ЕВЕ 7матаFACT: Many conspiracy theorists point to FEMA's preliminary report, which said there was relatively light damage to WTC 7 prior to its collapse. With the benefit of more time and resources, NIST researchers now support the working hypothesis that WTC 7 was far more compromised by falling debris than the FEMA report indicated. "The most important thing we found was that there was, in fact, physical damage to the south face of building 7," NIST's Sunder tells PM. "On about a third of the face to the center and to the bottom — approximately 10 stories — about 25 percent of the depth of the building was scooped out." NIST also discovered previously undocumented damage to WTC 7's upper stories and its southwest corner.
NIST investigators believe a combination of intense fire and severe structural damage contributed to the collapse, though assigning the exact proportion requires more research. But NIST's analysis suggests the fall of WTC 7 was an example of "progressive collapse," a process in which the failure of parts of a structure ultimately creates strains that cause the entire building to come down. Videos of the fall of WTC 7 show cracks, or "kinks," in the building's facade just before the two penthouses disappeared into the structure, one after the other. The entire building fell in on itself, with the slumping east side of the structure pulling down the west side in a diagonal collapse.
According to NIST, there was one primary reason for the building's failure: In an unusual design, the columns near the visible kinks were carrying exceptionally large loads, roughly 2000 sq. Ft. Of floor area for each floor. "What our preliminary analysis has shown is that if you take out just one column on one of the lower floors," Sunder notes, "it could cause a vertical progression of collapse so that the entire section comes down."
There are two other possible contributing factors still under investigation: First, trusses on the fifth and seventh floors were designed to transfer loads from one set of columns to another. With columns on the south face apparently damaged, high stresses would likely have been communicated to columns on the building's other faces, thereby exceeding their load-bearing capacities.
Second, a fifth-floor fire burned for up to 7 hours. "There was no firefighting in WTC 7," Sunder says. Investigators believe the fire was fed by tanks of diesel fuel that many tenants used to run emergency generators.
WTC 7 might have withstood the physical damage it received, or the fire that burned for hours, but those combined factors — along with the building's unusual construction — were enough to set off the chain-reaction collapse.
НАЈУВАЖНО ПАЗИ ЕВЕ ГИ СЕИЗМИЧКИТЕ ПОДАТОЦИ
On that graph, the 8- and 10-second collapses appear — misleadingly — as a pair of sudden spikes. Lamont-Doherty's 40-second plot of the same data (Graph 2) gives a much more detailed picture: The seismic waves — blue for the South Tower, red for the North Tower — start small and then escalate as the buildings rumble to the ground. Translation: NO BOMBS.
не веруј на видео кое е направено туку така САД се светска сила а банкарите ги кочат....ахахахахах има во економијата монетарна теорија(од економистот милтон фридман-нобеловец)
овој филм е правен за да ги манипулира глупите американци.....СЕГА ЦЕЛА ШТЕТА
200 000 загубени работни места
The September 11 attacks inflicted casualties and material damages on a far greater scale than any other terrorist aggression in recent history. Lower Manhattan lost approximately 30 percent of its office space and a number of businesses ceased to exist. Close to 200,000 jobs were destroyed or relocated out of New York City, at least temporarily. The destruction of physical assets was estimated in the national accounts to amount to $14 billion for private businesses, $1.5 billion for state and local government enterprises and $0.7 billion for federal enterprises. Rescue, cleanup and related costs have been estimated to amount to at least $11 billion for a total direct cost of $27.2 billion.
Immediate and Short Term Indirect Impacts
Immediately after the attacks, leading forecast services sharply revised downward their projections of economic activity. The consensus forecast for U.S. Real GDP growth was instantly downgraded by 0.5 percentage points for 2001 and 1.2 percentage points for 2002. The implied projected cumulative loss in national income through the end of 2003 amounted to 5 percentage points of annual GDP, or half a trillion dollars.(ГЛЕДАЈ ЗАГУБА ПОЛА ТРИЛИОН ЛОГИЧНО ТИ Е СЕГА!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
With production disrupted in some areas (airlines) and consumers increasingly cautious, real GDP shrank in the third quarter of 2001. But in the fourth quarter, demand held up better than initially feared, and GDP increased. However, private sector fixed investment registered a steep decline, and inventories were slashed. Offsetting these forces, however, were household consumption, helped by falling energy prices, and government spending. Defense spending in particular grew by about 9.25% in real terms in the fourth quarter, at a seasonally adjusted annual rate.
Some sectors or firms actually witnessed an increase in demand, notably in the area of security and information technology. Still, while overall demand proved fairly resilient, a number of sectors were hit hard, with declining output and profits continuing into the mid-term.
Overall however the short-term adverse economic impact of the attacks was far less than feared initially, thanks in large part to good economic crisis management. The Federal Reserve, the Administration and Congress acted quickly to restore confidence, inject liquidity and provide resources to deal with the consequences of the attacks. The Federal Reserve by lowering the price of credit and temporarily providing vast amounts of liquidity helped safeguard the integrity of the financial system and saved many firms from bankruptcy.(банкарите ги намалија каматите за да спречат банкрот)
Medium Term Impacts
Looking beyond the short term, the fact that the attack was premeditated and therefore could be repeated has had a significant impact on five main areas: (1) insurance; (2) airlines; (3) tourism and other industries associated with travel; (4) shipping; and (5) increased defense/security expenditures. In turn, developments in these areas have had a broader effect on wide areas of economic activity.
Insurance. The losses from the terrorist attacks for the insurance industry (including reinsurance) are estimated at between $30 and $58 billion with the main uncertainty concerning liability insurance. By comparison the losses associated with Hurricane Andrew's 1992 damage in Florida came to around $21 billion. Even if the final cost is close to the lower estimate, insured losses in 2001 are likely to have been the highest ever.
Following the attacks, most primary insurers have increased their premiums and curtailed or dropped altogether coverage for terrorism-related risk. The increases in insurance premiums have adversely affected several key industries. The strongest impact has been on aviation, but other sectors, including transportation, construction, and tourism and energy generation have also been affected. Overall it is estimated that commercial property and liability insurance rates have been raised by 30 percent on average.
Airlines. The United States' airline industry was already in a weak financial position before the attacks with rising debt ratios and falling returns on investment. Even with cutbacks in service of the order of 20 percent and significant government support, airline passenger traffic has apparently remained below normal, 100,000 layoffs have been announced and employment in October and November fell by 81,000 (almost 8 percent). Equity valuations compared to the overall market illustrate these difficulties. The U.S. Airline sector has lost around 20 percent of its relative value since September 10.
Tourism and Other Service Industries. Other industries have also been badly affected, such as hotels, tourism, automobile rentals, travel agents, and civilian aircraft manufactures.
прочитај убаво.
поздрав
Toecutter
Biafran Baby
ACHTUNG !!! GLUPOST NA NEDELATA!
Goltaj CNN be brat,bravo na kamo da imav um ko tvojot.Ili goltaj nasive televizii i vesnici. Bas se raduvam sto platata kaj nas e 19.963 den.I 20 godini se na arno ni odi.
Za proces na mislenje se potrebni najmalku dve informacii od dva izvori pa ti vidi.
SAD kako i sekoja druga zemja ne e zivo sustvestvo ili predmet pa da mu pravat steta na toj subjekt poznat kako SAD ili UK ili MK ili bilo koj.
Na teritorijata poznata kako SAD ziveat 300.000.000 poedinci. Mal del od niv si rabotat na svoi celi i bas gi zabole kolku 'raja' ke ostane bez raboti ke strada ili ke izumri.
Ubavo ti bese objasneto vo Zeitgeist kako se stvaraat pari OD NISTO i kako funkcionira bankarskiot sistem, ama ajde...
Nema vrska 'Kursk' so 9-11 po nikoj osnova. Se raboti za nesposobnost/nekompetentnost/nemanje sredstva. I toa sto odbija stranska pomos da gi spasat mornarite duri imase sansa.
Niti poradi edno niti poradi drugo. Poradi NAFTA. I poradi zgolemen voen budzet. 9-11 e IZGOVOR. Koga sadam vo realnosta koristel bojni otrovi nikoj nisto ne go interesiralo.
A da ke zaboraev, ne najdoja nikakvi oruzja za masovno unistuvanje.
A kolku za tvoja informacija edinstveno amerikancite gi imaat upotrebeno site mozni vidovi takvi oruzja vklucuvajki i atomsko. Znaci treba da se napadnat sami sebe kako zakana za svetskiot mir.
Biseri. Navedi eden primer kade bez nikakov 'povod' se velglo nekade. Napadot na SRJ bese da se 'spreci humanitarnata katastrofa na albanskiot narod na Kosovo'. Ako sega bi go pravele istoto ke MORA da izmislat nesto novo na primer srpski teroristi napagaat nekoja americka baba na odmor vo Dubrovnik ili slicno.
Da ne si portparol na belata kuka?
Ti si vernik. I toa fundamentalisticki.
19 arapi naoruzani so skalperi za karton dosle vo amerika ucele mesec dena PPL na Cessna 150/152/172, poveketo od niv bile tolku nekadarni, ama ete pravele manevri sto ne mozat ni piloti so po 10.000 casa nalet.
Prasaj bilo koj pilot za ova ke go dobies odgovorot.
Izgleda imas gledano mnogu filmovi so Chuck Norris i Steven Seagal.
R
RAYTHEON23
Гостин
irak upotrebi VX vrz kurdite FAKT vo IRAN ISTO ti dadov i dokazi...nalet kursk JASNO PI{UVA SEIZMIC WAWES=NO BOMBS!!!!!!!!!!!!!
a koja e razlikata pomegu milo[evik i SADAM.....pak neka se borea za prava gi vide polatrilion zaguba!!!!!!!
SAKA{ DA KAZES ZA BANKITE MILTON FRIDMAN NOBELOVEC GRESI.......
offff leleeeee kako bre luge vie od cajtgejs goltate zdravo za gotovo i vide zgradata pocnala da kolapsira ozgora nadole a pri eksploziv e obratno....
OF TOPIK a znae[ deka programata nafta za hrana ubi okolu minimum 500000deca vo irak a sepak bea snabduvani so NAFTA
a koja e razlikata pomegu milo[evik i SADAM.....pak neka se borea za prava gi vide polatrilion zaguba!!!!!!!
SAKA{ DA KAZES ZA BANKITE MILTON FRIDMAN NOBELOVEC GRESI.......
offff leleeeee kako bre luge vie od cajtgejs goltate zdravo za gotovo i vide zgradata pocnala da kolapsira ozgora nadole a pri eksploziv e obratno....
OF TOPIK a znae[ deka programata nafta za hrana ubi okolu minimum 500000deca vo irak a sepak bea snabduvani so NAFTA
Грешка си...Во Zeitgeist документарката најдобро е објаснето рушењето на кулите...Јас во ниту еден друг документарен филм не сум гледал толку детално објаснување. И во овој филм зборуваат стручњаци, ако не си го гледал целиот тогаш не трескај зелени.
Zaphod Beeblebrox
Поранешен покул Божино
Што толку сте запнале со тој Zeitgeist па Zeitgeist. Демек ако сте го гледале значи знаете се што како е. Сведоци зборат за најголемите тајни во светов а документарниот си се шета низ интернет и низ цел свет без никој да не го прекине, зашто нормално ако е вистина тогаш ке им смета на обвинетете во Zeitgeist. Според мене во Zeitgeist има нешто вистина али повеќето е дип шит и измислици од креаторот.