- Член од
- 13 јули 2006
- Мислења
- 15.630
- Поени од реакции
- 18.659
Време е малце да ја освежам темата, затоа што се наоѓаме на крстопат.
САД и ЕУ тргнуваат по различни патеки во иднината на банкарскиот сектор. Не знам која од која е полоша.
ЕУ тргнува кон целосна централизација со дигитална евро валута.
With the digital euro, they would take a major step towards consolidating this power. It is programmable, fully transparent money on a centralized blockchain that would transform money into a morally and politically charged commodity. Climate targets, individual CO2 consumption, meat consumption, and travel activities—the coupling of individual behavior to the emissions-based control complex seems tangible. And sanctioning citizens and companies in cases of dissident behavior could become routine bureaucratic work.
Following the line of reasoning of ECB President Christine Lagarde, it is clear what awaits Europeans: algorithmic surveillance of economic activity and moralistic control of individual behavior.
Ова е практично тоа за што европјаниве ја обвинуваат Кина дека го прави.
САД тргнуваат по друг пат, целосно приватни пари.
Meanwhile, across the Atlantic, an astonishing turnaround is taking place. The monetary policy direction of President Trump’s administration aims at the partial reactivation of the private money system. The legal framework currently being set up (GENIUS Act) gives commercial banks the possibility to issue their own stablecoins, i.e., digital dollars, thereby expanding the booming market currently dominated by Tether. Worldwide, over 500 million people already use this new form of money—a movement that seems unstoppable, regardless of how Europeans view it.
Every dollar stablecoin is backed by an equivalent amount of short-term US Treasury bonds as well as gold or Bitcoin, giving the US Treasury a convincing argument to actively participate in the spread of this technology—American government debt is literally being sold to the private sector.
This development recalls the time before the Federal Reserve was founded. Back then, the role of the central bank slowly changed from a "lender of last resort" for commercial banks to a money printer financing government debt—combined with asset manipulation. Step by step, the USA could return to the 19th-century free banking era, when private credit houses issued their own banknotes backed by gold or silver. The solvency of the institutions was overseen by clearinghouses—not a politically influenced central bank.
Misjudgments led to bankruptcies; there were no bailouts—credit volume was limited according to market-based risk assessments.
Со оглед дека САД не се исти какви што беа пред 120 години, сега практично улогата на креатори на пари ќе бидат ОГРОМНИТЕ корпорации кои ќе издаваат своја валута. Секој се разбира ќе сака да користи валута која е посигурна. Тоа значи сигурно чекориме кон ТЕХНОФЕУДАЛИЗАМ. Фејсбук сакаше да издава своја валута пред неколку години, но тогашната администрација не му дозволи, сега никој нема да го спречи.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
www.zerohedge.com
About the author: Thomas Kolbe, a German graduate economist, has worked for over 25 years as a journalist and media producer for clients from various industries and business associations. As a publicist, he focuses on economic processes and observes geopolitical events from the perspective of the capital markets. His publications follow a philosophy that focuses on the individual and their right to self-determination.
САД и ЕУ тргнуваат по различни патеки во иднината на банкарскиот сектор. Не знам која од која е полоша.
ЕУ тргнува кон целосна централизација со дигитална евро валута.
With the digital euro, they would take a major step towards consolidating this power. It is programmable, fully transparent money on a centralized blockchain that would transform money into a morally and politically charged commodity. Climate targets, individual CO2 consumption, meat consumption, and travel activities—the coupling of individual behavior to the emissions-based control complex seems tangible. And sanctioning citizens and companies in cases of dissident behavior could become routine bureaucratic work.
Following the line of reasoning of ECB President Christine Lagarde, it is clear what awaits Europeans: algorithmic surveillance of economic activity and moralistic control of individual behavior.
Ова е практично тоа за што европјаниве ја обвинуваат Кина дека го прави.
САД тргнуваат по друг пат, целосно приватни пари.
Meanwhile, across the Atlantic, an astonishing turnaround is taking place. The monetary policy direction of President Trump’s administration aims at the partial reactivation of the private money system. The legal framework currently being set up (GENIUS Act) gives commercial banks the possibility to issue their own stablecoins, i.e., digital dollars, thereby expanding the booming market currently dominated by Tether. Worldwide, over 500 million people already use this new form of money—a movement that seems unstoppable, regardless of how Europeans view it.
Every dollar stablecoin is backed by an equivalent amount of short-term US Treasury bonds as well as gold or Bitcoin, giving the US Treasury a convincing argument to actively participate in the spread of this technology—American government debt is literally being sold to the private sector.
This development recalls the time before the Federal Reserve was founded. Back then, the role of the central bank slowly changed from a "lender of last resort" for commercial banks to a money printer financing government debt—combined with asset manipulation. Step by step, the USA could return to the 19th-century free banking era, when private credit houses issued their own banknotes backed by gold or silver. The solvency of the institutions was overseen by clearinghouses—not a politically influenced central bank.
Misjudgments led to bankruptcies; there were no bailouts—credit volume was limited according to market-based risk assessments.
Со оглед дека САД не се исти какви што беа пред 120 години, сега практично улогата на креатори на пари ќе бидат ОГРОМНИТЕ корпорации кои ќе издаваат своја валута. Секој се разбира ќе сака да користи валута која е посигурна. Тоа значи сигурно чекориме кон ТЕХНОФЕУДАЛИЗАМ. Фејсбук сакаше да издава своја валута пред неколку години, но тогашната администрација не му дозволи, сега никој нема да го спречи.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Тhe Return Of Private Money: American Dream Meets European Nightmare
The Return Of Private Money: American Dream Meets European Nightmare | ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
www.zerohedge.com
About the author: Thomas Kolbe, a German graduate economist, has worked for over 25 years as a journalist and media producer for clients from various industries and business associations. As a publicist, he focuses on economic processes and observes geopolitical events from the perspective of the capital markets. His publications follow a philosophy that focuses on the individual and their right to self-determination.