ЕУ: Бугарија и Романија се сеуште ПРЕКОРУМПИРАНИ!

  • Креатор на темата Креатор на темата VOLK2234
  • Време на започнување Време на започнување

VOLK2234

еврофоб и хомоскептик
Член од
16 септември 2008
Мислења
5.517
Поени од реакции
4.387
July 24, 2009

A new report from the European Commission notes progress but still finds too much organized crime and corruption in the two new member states

When Bulgaria and Romania joined the European Union in 2007, other member states expressed serious concern about the high level of corruption in both of the former communist states, and, in Bulgaria, about the political power wielded by violent criminal gangs operating there. Now, some 30 months after joining the union, widespread fraud, corruption, and organized crime remain problematic according to new European Union reports that openly question the will of political leaders to implement reforms to tackle these problems.

The latest progress reports on the justice system and fight against corruption, released on 22 July, come as a serious if not unexpected blow to Bulgaria and Romania – which suffer from the public perception they were accepted into the EU club too early – but also to EU candidate countries where accession talks have stalled, such as Croatia and perennial hopeful Turkey.

PLAY OR PAY

While noting Bulgaria's and Romania's progress in key areas, the European Commission, as in previous reports since 2007, listed an array of ills, among them inadequate measures to fight money-laundering and killings linked to organized crime. In total, the reports named 21 areas in which Bulgaria needs to improve its performance, and 16 for Romania, including the implementation of anti-corruption laws and boosting the judicial independence.

"The reform momentum that has been established now needs to be backed up by a national political consensus involving all political parties and institutions, and more convincing delivery of results," European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso said in a statement. "Citizens in both countries and across the rest of Europe must feel that no one is above the law. I hope that the two governments will move quickly to implement the concrete recommendations for reform that the Commission has put forward."

The commission last year froze around 500 million euros in subsidies earmarked to help the Bulgarian economy and threatened to sanction Romania as well over exactly the same kinds of failings outlined in this week's reports.

This time the commission decided not to advise other member states to stop cooperation with Bulgaria and Romania on judicial issues, an option known as the "safeguard clause" in the two countries' accession agreements. Brussels also stopped short of saying that the shortcomings could imperil the countries' attempts to join the border-free Schengen area in 2011.

But the commission will extend into 2010 the monitoring system, known as the Cooperation and Verification Mechanism, with the next progress report due in a year's time. That extension is a political embarrassment for Sofia and Bucharest – and a wake-up call for Croatia to also get its house in order. EU Enlargement Commissioner Olli Rehn noted that Zagreb is also lagging in "key areas such as judicial and administrative reform, the fight against corruption, and organized crime."

BIG JOB FOR NEW BULGARIAN LEADER

Whether this will instill a need to fast-track reforms remains to be seen. Indeed, the commission – which has already barred two Bulgarian government agencies from handling EU funds – said in its latest report that while Sofia no longer is denying that organized crime and corruption are widespread, the political will to do something about it is not yet evident.

"In the public perception in Bulgaria justice is too slow" and is "subject to influence and interference," Johannes Leitenberger, chief spokesperson for the commission, told reporters in Brussels, as cited by EUobserver.com. "There are still shortcomings which need to be urgently addressed by the newly elected Bulgarian government."

The commission released the latest judicial and crime monitoring reports days before the scheduled swearing-in of Bulgaria's incoming prime minister, Boyko Borisov, the Sofia mayor and a former Interior Ministry official who won elections this month on an anti-corruption platform. His party GERB (Citizens for the European Development of Bulgaria) also pledged to go after former government officials suspected of graft and has promised to implement the commission's demands.

If Borisov talks tough, he may well have the background and political muscle to back up his words. The private security company he founded helped protect Bulgaria's deposed last communist leader, Todor Zhivkov, and on the other side of the political spectrum, Simeon Saxecoburggotski, the deposed monarch who returned from exile and served as premier from 2001 until 2005.

MILD PRAISE FOR BUCHAREST

Romania – criticized for its fragmented and politicized approach to reform – did earn praise for the work of its anti-corruption directorate. Organized crime is also seen as far less of a problem than in Bulgaria. According to the commission, the country's criminal and civil codes, while updated, have not been fully or systematically revised, leading to a "patchwork" of ad hoc legislation that risks compromising anti-corruption efforts.

In Romania, "reform efforts remain fragmented, they have not yet taken firmly root and must still produce practical results," the commission stated. "Overall, a broad based political consensus behind reform and an unequivocal commitment across political parties to real progress has still to be demonstrated." And while prosecutors in Romania have accused almost 20 cabinet ministers and former ministers of corruption since the country's accession to the bloc in 2007, not one has been convicted.

Opinion polls show EU citizens have grown more wary of bringing new countries into the bloc since the "early admission" of Bulgaria and Romania – and the perception of lawlessness in the region is a factor. But without the "carrot" of that qualified (i.e. monitored) membership and the "stick" of sanctions, the wheels of judicial reform in these countries would have turned far slower. The message to EU candidates Croatia, Turkey, and Macedonia and those waiting in the wings (Serbia, Montenegro, Bosnia, and Albania) is to raise the bar – accelerate reforms – ahead of entry or formal accession talks.

Likewise, if Brussels should renege on the promise of future membership to the Balkans it could destabilize an already volatile region, right on the EU border. In that regard, Enlargement Commissioner Rehn was right this month to propose offering visa-free travel for citizens of Macedonia, Serbia, and Montenegro from 1 January 2010, in an effort to bring these countries closer to the bloc even as Brussels pushes for faster political, judicial, and economic progress.

http://www.businessweek.com/globalbi...724_792963.htm

-----

Ги болдирав државите колку да видите кој каков прогрес направил.
Ние сме заедно со Хрватска и Турција,
додека зад нас се Србија, Босна, Албанија и Црна Гора.

Споредете ја релевантноста на овој извор,
и релевантноста на трабант-експертите и пикавец-политичарите тука, што велат дека Србија Босна и Албанија не претркале.

Еве еден коментар од мене, коментирајте и вие на нивниот сајт,
нека знаат дека нивните евро-пејски пропаганди и мајтапи се проѕирни.

This is a public secret. Everybody knew that the corruption was still present at large scale in the time when Bulgaria and Romania joined the EU. They entered in the EU without satisfying the BASIC conditions. On the other hand, in someway, Macedonia is blackmailed with ADITIONAL conditions, which are ridicilous, and therefore causing anger and frustrations among the Macedonians. It would be great if EU birocrats could say loud what do they want. If they dont want the EU enlargement, they should pull back their ambassadors (tutors). Simply get off our head. If they do want the enlargement, they should be more careful towards the Macedonian people and their feelings, when supporting the Greek nationalism and in some cases, faschism demonstrated direcly by the Greek goverment, in the name issue with Macedonia. We see completely different things in theory and practice. EU members should give all the rights that the national minorities deserve. Macedonia IS NOT part of the EU, but, the minorities have rights like no other country in the world.

On the other hand, Greece is using the same methods of psychologigal terror on the minorities, as were used by Heinrich Himler in WW2. Now analyse the term "European Values" ... Sad, isnt it...
 
еве што пишува New York Times:

“In fact enlargement has been a success because, though they are perceived to be bad by E.U. standards, Romania and Bulgaria are hugely successful by Eastern European standards,”

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/23/world/europe/23briefs-Brussels.html?_r=1&scp=2&sq=bulgaria&st=cse

Тоа го кажал Румунот Нико Попеску.:kesa::kesa:

Пишува дека во споредба со Молдавија и Украина сте биле епетен успешни. :pos2: :pos2:

Прочитај ја целата статија да видиш како ве опишале, како последни дрипци.

Ако не ве знаевме кои сте, може медиумиве ќе ни мачкаа очи, ама бар вас ве знаеме.


E.U. Report Finds Bulgaria and Romania Beset With Problems
By STEPHEN CASTLE

Published: July 22, 2009

BRUSSELS — Thirty months after joining the European Union, Bulgaria and Romania are still plagued by widespread fraud, corruption and organized crime, according to a report published Wednesday that also questions the will of political leaders to deliver the necessary reforms.

The hard-hitting judgment from the European Commission listed an array of deficiencies, citing inadequate measures to fight money-laundering, vote-buying, fraud and killings linked to organized crime.

The report said Bulgaria had made some progress in restructuring its criminal prosecution service and recording more convictions over all. It suggests that in other respects, however, not much has improved since 2008 when the commission issued its last stern warning.

The slow pace of change in Bulgaria and the lack of convictions in high-profile corruption cases have served as a potent example of the problems of bringing fragile ex-Communist nations into the European mainstream.

The capacity of enforcement authorities to deal with high-level corruption,” the report said, “has not increased on a general scale over the last 12 months.”

Romania fared slightly better in the report, though it was told that its reform efforts remain “fragmented.”

With Croatia in talks to join the E.U., and several other nations in Southern and Eastern Europe also hoping to do so, the report may reinforce growing skepticism in some European capitals about the wisdom of further expansion.

“The bad news, and the slowdown in terms of reform in Romania and Bulgaria, can only weaken the case for further enlargement of the E.U.,” said Nicu Popescu, research fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations.

However, he added that both countries would have been in worse shape had they not been admitted to the E.U. in 2007, and are nevertheless much more successful than other nations in the region like Moldova or Ukraine.

“In fact enlargement has been a success because, though they are perceived to be bad by E.U. standards, Romania and Bulgaria are hugely successful by Eastern European standards,” Mr. Popescu added.

In a statement, the president of the European Commission, José Manuel Barroso, underlined the need for greater political commitment to the task of rooting out corruption.

“Citizens in both countries and across the rest of Europe must feel that no one is above the law,” he said.

Following publication of the report Bulgaria was given 21 recommended tasks to carry out, while Romania given 16. A special monitoring system for both countries, set up when the two countries joined the E.U. because of concerns that they weren’t ready, is to be extended into 2010.

So serious are the problems in Bulgaria that the European Commission continues to freeze around €500 million, or $710 million, from a pool of subsidy money that was intended to help Bulgaria make the necessary economic and management reforms. The commission had previously decided to withhold payment of more than €290 million because of Bulgaria’s lack of progress. Around €115 million that were frozen last year have been released.

The report on Wednesday contains an implicit threat that further E.U. subsidy payments will be held up if corrective action is not taken. There was no direct mention of the two countries’ ambitions to join the Schengen zone, Europe’s passport-free travel zone, though the tone of the documents released Wednesday suggest that is not a likely prospect in the near future.

For Bulgaria, the report comes at a time of political transition as a newly elected center-right government prepares to take power. It faces pressure to deliver visible examples of progress in order to get funds released.

The party of the new Bulgarian prime minister, Boiko Borisov, responded to the report by reiterating a pledge to step up the fight against corruption.

“To soften Brussels’s tone, it is important to demonstrate political will from day one in office of the new government,” said Tsvetan Tsvetanov, the chairman of Mr. Borisov’s party, GERB, according to Reuters.

The Romanian justice minister, Catalin Predoiu, called for a political consensus that would enable the judicial system to function efficiently and the courts to take fast decisions.

“With or without a monitoring mechanism, Romania will remain committed to pursuing judicial reforms because such reforms are, first of all, in the interest of its citizens,” Mr. Predoiu said.

Both governments know it will be hard to win over critics. Though new procedures in Bulgaria have led to the imprisonment of some members of organized crime groups, “killings linked with organized crime continue and known criminals are not apprehended,” the report said.

“There is a need for clear evidence that the authorities and the political class are unequivocally committed to eradicating the root-causes of the problem,” it added.

The document highlighted “piecemeal” efforts against corruption and “unreasonable” delays in judicial proceedings. In financial investigations, it said, “too few assets are frozen and too late.”

The document also cited reports of vote-buying during European and national elections in July.

As for Romania, the report said that permanent political infighting is hindering reform efforts.

“Against this background the positive results of concrete reform efforts at technical level remain fragmented, reforms have not yet taken firmly root and shortcomings persist.”

Romania’s record on combating corruption was questioned. “It is striking,” the report said, “that virtually none of the cases of highest public interest have yet reached a decision.”
 

Kajgana Shop

Back
На врв Bottom