Vanlok
deus ex machina
- Член од
- 30 мај 2009
- Мислења
- 28.937
- Поени од реакции
- 38.836
Автоматски споено мислење:
This statement is doing several dangerous things at once and none of them are supported by evidence.
First: there is no public evidence that the New Year’s Eve plot in Los Angeles involved plans to attack Jewish organizations. None has been presented by law enforcement, none has been charged in court, and none has been substantiated in official filings.
Asserting that people were “also busy wanting to attack Jewish organizations” is a speculative claim about intent, which is not how criminal responsibility works.
Second: the claim that “antisemitism is anti-American” and that anti-Americanism and antisemitism are functionally the same, is a category error.
The United States is a sovereign, secular republic with a Christian-majority country and founded on those ideals, not an ethno-religious state. Political opposition to U.S. policy, immigration enforcement, or foreign wars is not the same thing as hatred toward a religious group, and collapsing those distinctions redefines dissent as bigotry.
Third: the idea that the appropriate response to alleged threats is to increase highly visible public gatherings during a period of tension should be questioned seriously. From a basic security standpoint, concentrating people in symbolic spaces creates more targets, not fewer, and raises the risk of provocation or escalation. It's almost as if he wants more incidents in order to push his agenda....
Finally, notice the pattern of LYING and rhetoric:
• unproven claims of intent
• expansion of threat definitions
• conflation of political opposition with hatred
• calls for increased visibility rather than restraint
If claims are being made about plots or coordinated hatred to influence national policy, the burden is on officials to present verifiable evidence, not slop that blurs the line between religion, politics, and national identity.
Автоматски споено мислење:
Последно уредено:
