Bratot
Стоик и Машкртник!
- Член од
- 27 јануари 2007
- Мислења
- 17.089
- Поени од реакции
- 4.499
....доколку нормално било Крум да биде рекс - крал на Македонија, се мисли на ТЕМАТА МАКЕДОНИЈА, а не на етногеографска историска Македонија.
There are two hypotheses about the family origin of Krum. According to the first one, his family has come from Pannonia, where it had been in service of the Avars[1] whereas according the second and more popular, Krum was born in Macedonia. [1]His father Toktu was a member of a proto-Bulgarian noble family and even became a ruler of Bulgaria between 766 and 767. Most likely he belonged to the branch of Dulo which settled in Macedonia, led by Kuber and established a Bulgarian state with serious Slavic participation.[1] Krum's mother Lana (or Svetlana) was of Slavic descent and this gives further explanation to the fact that Krum was described and portrayed by the Byzantine chronists as a light-hairеd man with light eyes, especially taking into consideration that there is no evidence for the existence of blond people on the Balkans till the arrival of the Slavs.
Васил 2 Пурпурниот е наречен Македонец бидејќи е роден во ТЕМАТА Македонија, односно источна Тракија денешна Турција.
Basil was born to Armenian parents in 811 in the Byzantine theme of Macedonia (an administrative division corresponding to the area of Adrianople in Thrace).[1] While one source has claimed him to be of Slavic decent, such assumptions have been dismissed as fiction by the scholarly world.[2] The sole foundation of the Slavonic theory is that Arabic writers designate him as a Slav; this is explained by the Arabic view that all Macedonians were Slavs.
Поради истата причина и Крум е заведен како Македонски Крал.
Зошто не почнеш според твојата улога, да не убедуваш дека Крум и Василиј биле Македонци?
Додавката “Бугароубиец“ му е дадена неколку века подоцна (14 век) во Хрониката на Ефрем (Ephraim Aenii Historia Chronica, Athens, 1990, стр. 109) 4 века после битката кај Беласица, односно откако веќе била создадена ТЕМАТА БУЛГАРИЈА во 1018 г на територијата на денешна Македонија (заедно со оној дел во Грција), југоисточна Србија и северозападна Бугарија.
In chapter five, Stephenson explores how the contemporary authors referred to Basil. An extensive survey of the Byzantine sources reveal that instead of Voulgaroktonos, Basil was generally referred to as porphyrogennetos or "born in the purple" to show he was the reigning emperor. Otherwise he was referred to as "the younger" or "the second". Thus Basil was known to the chroniclers and others as Basil II. This trend continued in the literature well beyond the life of Basil. Stephenson also reveals that this was well known even to biographers in the seventeenth century.
It is not until chapter six thatthe mystery is revealed in why Basil transforms from porphyrogennetos into the Voulgaroktonoс. As one might suspect it has more to do with political changes, particularly in the ways that Bulgars were viewed in the twelfth century, rather than any particular historical activities. However, Basil image would decline again in later centuries, particularly with the rise of the Turks and a decline in the threat from the Bulgars.
The Legend of Basil the Bulgar-Slayer
http://www.deremilitari.org/REVIEWS/...nson_basil.htm
Значи по не знам кој пат требаше да повториме за да ја тргнеме маглата што ја сеете.
Василиј е наречен „Бугароубиец“ цели 4 века после битката на Беласица.
Како резултат на тогашните политички поимања на административните теми.
“Бугарија“ и “бугарско царство“ во ниту една форма НЕ ПОСТОИ меѓу 972 и 1018 година.
? од каде ти е ... ?