Повторно Нагорно Карабах ?
- Креатор на темата jamajka
- Време на започнување
- Член од
- 23 мај 2019
- Мислења
- 4.441
- Поени од реакции
- 5.159
Овие пишуваат дека Ерменија, испраќа муниција и ПВО во Украина, сакале да ги заменат за мистрали и цезари.
www.kyivpost.com
Изгледа Ерменија има вишок територија па сака да се ослободи!
Armenia Allegedly Transferring Most of Its Air Defense Systems to Ukraine
Russian sources, including the notorious “Fighterbomber” milblogger say Armenia has provided Ukraine with multiple air defense systems as part of a significant military aid package.
www.kyivpost.com
Изгледа Ерменија има вишок територија па сака да се ослободи!
The xx
Russia state-affiliated bot. ☑️
- Член од
- 8 април 2013
- Мислења
- 6.871
- Поени од реакции
- 12.968
"Pachinyan a vendu l'Arménie aux Américains pour la démolir" - STRATPOL
Le général Dominique Delawarde, chevalier de la Légion d’Honneur et ancien officier de l’armée française, s’est exprimé sur l’évolution de
stratpol.com
Имате превод со гугл.
Vanlok
deus ex machina
- Член од
- 30 мај 2009
- Мислења
- 25.697
- Поени од реакции
- 33.890
Добар текст, ај да ги поштедиме другиве а може и некој не се снаоѓа со преведувањето.
“Pachinyan sold Armenia to the Americans to demolish it”
18 septembre 2024Dominique Delawarde3847 Views2 Commentsinfluence, NGO
General Dominique Delawarde, a knight of the Legion of Honor and a former officer in the French Army, spoke on the evolution of France's domestic and foreign policy, as well as the growing influence of the United States through its international actions. He particularly emphasized the role of U.S. State Department-funded NGOs, which often serve as undercover agents to promote Western interests and disseminate them globally.
One of the most striking examples he cites is that of Armenia, a country where the United States and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) exercised notable influence from the earliest phases of its independence.
Delawarde begins by emphasizing the geostrategic importance of Armenia: « the USA and non-governmental organizations took an early interest in Armenia because it was a country that bordered both Iran and of course was in close proximity to Russia ». Armenia, historically linked to Russia, was gradually oriented towards the West through subtle, but effective, intervention by Western powers. The general specifies: « westerners managed to win the election, not by a colourful revolution, but almost I would say, and managed to win the election for a pro-Westerner named Paschignan who has, it will be said, sold his country to the West ».
The election of Nikol Pashinyan marked a turning point in Armenian foreign policy, severing traditional relations with Russia and steering the country towards closer partnership with the United States and Europe. However, the move had disastrous consequences for Armenia, especially in the conflict with Azerbaijan. Delawarde explains: « in doing this, Paschignan bluntly pointed out to the Russians the direction Armenia's foreign policy was taking and the Russians drew the conclusion when Azerbaijan attacked Armenia ». At first, Russia stepped in to protect Armenia, but « given Paschignan's position, dropped », leaving Armenia alone to face a better prepared Azerbaijan backed by powerful allies.
The role of Israel in this conflict is also mentioned by Delawarde, emphasizing the importance of geopolitical alliances in this complex region: « among the allies of Azerbaijan, there is one that was very important and that influences American foreign policy, and that is the State of Israel ». According to him, Israel provided military and strategic support to Azerbaijan: « Israel supported by arms, by advisers, the war of Azerbaijan against Armenia. And the victory of Azerbaijan is also a bit like the victory of Israel ».
This series of political choices led to the defeat of Armenia in the Nagorno-Karabakh war and the recapture of that territory by Azerbaijan. Delawarde sums up this situation with a certain cynicism: « armenians who elected Paschignan have what they deserve ». . He criticizes the lack of foresight of Armenian voters, who did not realize that « westerners were not as interested in good relations with Armenia as they were with Azerbaijan ». Eventually Armenia was « abandoned to her sad fate », losing not only the war, but also its regional influence to an Azerbaijan supported by major powers.
Delawarde explains that the United States circumvents its own national laws by outsourcing certain sensitive scientific activities to other countries. It states that « laws in the US prohibit a number of things, and that whatever they cannot do with complete peace of mind and freedom on their territory, they relocate it and they do in other territories of friendly countries ».
In his view, that applied not only to scientific experiments, but also to more controversial practices, such as torture. « In the United States, it has often relocated operations to countries where the practice is much less monitored », he adds, specifying that these operations generally take place in regions where it is unlikely that the media or investigators discover the truth: « In countries where we are not likely to have media and people who come to investigate, who come to find out what is really happening ».
With regard to biological laboratories, Delawarde points out the potential dangers they pose, citing in particular an incident in the United States at Fort Detrick, where a virus leak took place. « So is it dangerous? Yes, laboratories are always a little dangerous in that every once in a while, and it happened in the United States that a virus ended up passing through a human who was working in the Fort Detrick laboratory at the time. So they had to close the lab for a while and I think it's been reopened now », he explains.
He concludes by saying that the United States prefers to outsource these laboratories abroad to prevent such incidents from occurring in its own territory: « But it does not have many laboratories declared in the United States, very few, and it prefers to have them elsewhere. It is better for the problem to happen far from US borders than in the United States ».
Dominique Delawarde unveils worrying US strategy to project influence globally. According to him, the United States uses NGOs and supports pro-Western regimes while relocating controversial activities, such as biological research, to minimize internal risks while maintaining overall influence. He argues that these organizations are not as independent as they claim, and that they have the broad support of the US administration.
Delawarde points out that the methods employed include the manipulation of public opinion through local d’«influencers» and that the funding comes largely from the US government: « Just look at their funding (non-governmental organisations). You will see that most of the time you find funding from the American Department of State, that is to say, in fact, from the American Department of Foreign Affairs, that is to say from the American government administration. »
The example of Armenia shows the dangers of small countries turning away from their traditional allies and towards the West, often at the cost of their stability and security. According to Delawarde, these actions aim to impose a form of benevolent hegemony ’« dictated by American neoconservatives, with biolaboratories representing a potential threat to international stability.
“Pachinyan sold Armenia to the Americans to demolish it”
18 septembre 2024Dominique Delawarde3847 Views2 Commentsinfluence, NGO
General Dominique Delawarde, a knight of the Legion of Honor and a former officer in the French Army, spoke on the evolution of France's domestic and foreign policy, as well as the growing influence of the United States through its international actions. He particularly emphasized the role of U.S. State Department-funded NGOs, which often serve as undercover agents to promote Western interests and disseminate them globally.
One of the most striking examples he cites is that of Armenia, a country where the United States and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) exercised notable influence from the earliest phases of its independence.
Delawarde begins by emphasizing the geostrategic importance of Armenia: « the USA and non-governmental organizations took an early interest in Armenia because it was a country that bordered both Iran and of course was in close proximity to Russia ». Armenia, historically linked to Russia, was gradually oriented towards the West through subtle, but effective, intervention by Western powers. The general specifies: « westerners managed to win the election, not by a colourful revolution, but almost I would say, and managed to win the election for a pro-Westerner named Paschignan who has, it will be said, sold his country to the West ».
The election of Nikol Pashinyan marked a turning point in Armenian foreign policy, severing traditional relations with Russia and steering the country towards closer partnership with the United States and Europe. However, the move had disastrous consequences for Armenia, especially in the conflict with Azerbaijan. Delawarde explains: « in doing this, Paschignan bluntly pointed out to the Russians the direction Armenia's foreign policy was taking and the Russians drew the conclusion when Azerbaijan attacked Armenia ». At first, Russia stepped in to protect Armenia, but « given Paschignan's position, dropped », leaving Armenia alone to face a better prepared Azerbaijan backed by powerful allies.
The role of Israel in this conflict is also mentioned by Delawarde, emphasizing the importance of geopolitical alliances in this complex region: « among the allies of Azerbaijan, there is one that was very important and that influences American foreign policy, and that is the State of Israel ». According to him, Israel provided military and strategic support to Azerbaijan: « Israel supported by arms, by advisers, the war of Azerbaijan against Armenia. And the victory of Azerbaijan is also a bit like the victory of Israel ».
This series of political choices led to the defeat of Armenia in the Nagorno-Karabakh war and the recapture of that territory by Azerbaijan. Delawarde sums up this situation with a certain cynicism: « armenians who elected Paschignan have what they deserve ». . He criticizes the lack of foresight of Armenian voters, who did not realize that « westerners were not as interested in good relations with Armenia as they were with Azerbaijan ». Eventually Armenia was « abandoned to her sad fate », losing not only the war, but also its regional influence to an Azerbaijan supported by major powers.
Delawarde explains that the United States circumvents its own national laws by outsourcing certain sensitive scientific activities to other countries. It states that « laws in the US prohibit a number of things, and that whatever they cannot do with complete peace of mind and freedom on their territory, they relocate it and they do in other territories of friendly countries ».
In his view, that applied not only to scientific experiments, but also to more controversial practices, such as torture. « In the United States, it has often relocated operations to countries where the practice is much less monitored », he adds, specifying that these operations generally take place in regions where it is unlikely that the media or investigators discover the truth: « In countries where we are not likely to have media and people who come to investigate, who come to find out what is really happening ».
With regard to biological laboratories, Delawarde points out the potential dangers they pose, citing in particular an incident in the United States at Fort Detrick, where a virus leak took place. « So is it dangerous? Yes, laboratories are always a little dangerous in that every once in a while, and it happened in the United States that a virus ended up passing through a human who was working in the Fort Detrick laboratory at the time. So they had to close the lab for a while and I think it's been reopened now », he explains.
He concludes by saying that the United States prefers to outsource these laboratories abroad to prevent such incidents from occurring in its own territory: « But it does not have many laboratories declared in the United States, very few, and it prefers to have them elsewhere. It is better for the problem to happen far from US borders than in the United States ».
Dominique Delawarde unveils worrying US strategy to project influence globally. According to him, the United States uses NGOs and supports pro-Western regimes while relocating controversial activities, such as biological research, to minimize internal risks while maintaining overall influence. He argues that these organizations are not as independent as they claim, and that they have the broad support of the US administration.
Delawarde points out that the methods employed include the manipulation of public opinion through local d’«influencers» and that the funding comes largely from the US government: « Just look at their funding (non-governmental organisations). You will see that most of the time you find funding from the American Department of State, that is to say, in fact, from the American Department of Foreign Affairs, that is to say from the American government administration. »
The example of Armenia shows the dangers of small countries turning away from their traditional allies and towards the West, often at the cost of their stability and security. According to Delawarde, these actions aim to impose a form of benevolent hegemony ’« dictated by American neoconservatives, with biolaboratories representing a potential threat to international stability.
- Член од
- 24 април 2008
- Мислења
- 10.951
- Поени од реакции
- 12.360
А бе сето тоа е руско масло, Русите се криви, сакаат да ја распарчат и поделат Ерменија.Добар текст, ај да ги поштедиме другиве а може и некој не се снаоѓа со преведувањето.
“Pachinyan sold Armenia to the Americans to demolish it”
18 septembre 2024Dominique Delawarde3847 Views2 Commentsinfluence, NGO
General Dominique Delawarde, a knight of the Legion of Honor and a former officer in the French Army, spoke on the evolution of France's domestic and foreign policy, as well as the growing influence of the United States through its international actions. He particularly emphasized the role of U.S. State Department-funded NGOs, which often serve as undercover agents to promote Western interests and disseminate them globally.
One of the most striking examples he cites is that of Armenia, a country where the United States and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) exercised notable influence from the earliest phases of its independence.
Delawarde begins by emphasizing the geostrategic importance of Armenia: « the USA and non-governmental organizations took an early interest in Armenia because it was a country that bordered both Iran and of course was in close proximity to Russia ». Armenia, historically linked to Russia, was gradually oriented towards the West through subtle, but effective, intervention by Western powers. The general specifies: « westerners managed to win the election, not by a colourful revolution, but almost I would say, and managed to win the election for a pro-Westerner named Paschignan who has, it will be said, sold his country to the West ».
The election of Nikol Pashinyan marked a turning point in Armenian foreign policy, severing traditional relations with Russia and steering the country towards closer partnership with the United States and Europe. However, the move had disastrous consequences for Armenia, especially in the conflict with Azerbaijan. Delawarde explains: « in doing this, Paschignan bluntly pointed out to the Russians the direction Armenia's foreign policy was taking and the Russians drew the conclusion when Azerbaijan attacked Armenia ». At first, Russia stepped in to protect Armenia, but « given Paschignan's position, dropped », leaving Armenia alone to face a better prepared Azerbaijan backed by powerful allies.
The role of Israel in this conflict is also mentioned by Delawarde, emphasizing the importance of geopolitical alliances in this complex region: « among the allies of Azerbaijan, there is one that was very important and that influences American foreign policy, and that is the State of Israel ». According to him, Israel provided military and strategic support to Azerbaijan: « Israel supported by arms, by advisers, the war of Azerbaijan against Armenia. And the victory of Azerbaijan is also a bit like the victory of Israel ».
This series of political choices led to the defeat of Armenia in the Nagorno-Karabakh war and the recapture of that territory by Azerbaijan. Delawarde sums up this situation with a certain cynicism: « armenians who elected Paschignan have what they deserve ». . He criticizes the lack of foresight of Armenian voters, who did not realize that « westerners were not as interested in good relations with Armenia as they were with Azerbaijan ». Eventually Armenia was « abandoned to her sad fate », losing not only the war, but also its regional influence to an Azerbaijan supported by major powers.
Delawarde explains that the United States circumvents its own national laws by outsourcing certain sensitive scientific activities to other countries. It states that « laws in the US prohibit a number of things, and that whatever they cannot do with complete peace of mind and freedom on their territory, they relocate it and they do in other territories of friendly countries ».
In his view, that applied not only to scientific experiments, but also to more controversial practices, such as torture. « In the United States, it has often relocated operations to countries where the practice is much less monitored », he adds, specifying that these operations generally take place in regions where it is unlikely that the media or investigators discover the truth: « In countries where we are not likely to have media and people who come to investigate, who come to find out what is really happening ».
With regard to biological laboratories, Delawarde points out the potential dangers they pose, citing in particular an incident in the United States at Fort Detrick, where a virus leak took place. « So is it dangerous? Yes, laboratories are always a little dangerous in that every once in a while, and it happened in the United States that a virus ended up passing through a human who was working in the Fort Detrick laboratory at the time. So they had to close the lab for a while and I think it's been reopened now », he explains.
He concludes by saying that the United States prefers to outsource these laboratories abroad to prevent such incidents from occurring in its own territory: « But it does not have many laboratories declared in the United States, very few, and it prefers to have them elsewhere. It is better for the problem to happen far from US borders than in the United States ».
Dominique Delawarde unveils worrying US strategy to project influence globally. According to him, the United States uses NGOs and supports pro-Western regimes while relocating controversial activities, such as biological research, to minimize internal risks while maintaining overall influence. He argues that these organizations are not as independent as they claim, and that they have the broad support of the US administration.
Delawarde points out that the methods employed include the manipulation of public opinion through local d’«influencers» and that the funding comes largely from the US government: « Just look at their funding (non-governmental organisations). You will see that most of the time you find funding from the American Department of State, that is to say, in fact, from the American Department of Foreign Affairs, that is to say from the American government administration. »
The example of Armenia shows the dangers of small countries turning away from their traditional allies and towards the West, often at the cost of their stability and security. According to Delawarde, these actions aim to impose a form of benevolent hegemony ’« dictated by American neoconservatives, with biolaboratories representing a potential threat to international stability.
Западот е светилникот на слободата и демократијата, не е способен ниту да помисли на такви ужаси, а уште помалку па да им ги изврши на далеку помали и економски и воено послаби држави.
Vanlok
deus ex machina
- Член од
- 30 мај 2009
- Мислења
- 25.697
- Поени од реакции
- 33.890
Кој не ги знае, скапо ќе ги плати.