- Член од
- 5 мај 2005
- Мислења
- 4.454
- Поени од реакции
- 178
Еве ти пример кај се побиваш...Албанскиот и романскиот (староримскиот) имаат заедничко нешто. Тоа би било дека Римскиот јазик, бил како субстрат на Тракискиот јазик.the relations of Albanian to Illyrian
I am afraid to say that, if most historians and archaeologists really subscribe to the Illyrian theory, linguists are divided. There is some support for the Thracian theory. One of the latest important thorough analysis of this problem, the one of Georgiev, puts Albanian in close typological relationship to a Thracian language: the Daco-Misian (Georgiev believed that Daco-Misian was entirely different from languages of the Thracian group). Georgiev hypothesis has been, however, more than once rejected.
Though unenthusiastic about the Thracian theory, Cabej has nevertheless tried to explain through Albanian some Thracian insciptions. He didn't exclude the relevance of a Thracian component in Albanian. Having had for teacher and scientific mentor the albanologist Norbert Jokl, Cabej seems to have believed that Thracian and Illyrian were quite similar in structure and even in lexicon.
The supporters of the Thracian theory bring forward some convincing linguistic evidence: the close relationship between Albanian and Romanian. It is generally believed that Romanian, developed from Latin on a Thracian (Daco-Misian) substrate.
Nevertheless, some scholars, like G. Meyer, thought that Romanian had an Illyrian substrate. One thing seems very likely to be true: the substrate of Romanian is practically the same language as the "mother" of Albanian.
Е сега, со тоа што Илирскиот јазик, е исто така субстрат на Тракискиот, и Римскиот..значи имаат сличности.
Албанскиот, со сличности со илирскиот, на некој вид, е субстрат на римскиот, и илирскиот (тракискиот).
Дали се побиваш, или сеуште мислиш дека набиваш...