не е погрешен ами одбиваш да читаш до крај
Инаку форумов не дозволува да се внесе линк од видео (или платформата ЈУЈУ) кое е веќе објавен на друг канал а овој само го реемитува, ме мрзеше да барам друг линк затоа напишав:
Актуелни случувања во светот, со осврти од геополитички аспект
- Креатор на темата Vanlok
- Време на започнување
Инаку форумов не дозволува да се внесе линк од видео (или платформата ЈУЈУ) кое е веќе објавен на друг канал а овој само го реемитува, ме мрзеше да барам друг линк затоа напишав:
Vanlok
deus ex machina
- Член од
- 30 мај 2009
- Мислења
- 31.779
- Поени од реакции
- 42.865
Види го мојот линк/видео, почнува таман од каде што треба.
Ај да не тупиме, види си го линкот и ќе видиш дека видеото почнува некаде во првите неколку минти. Остај тоа што си допишал рачно, не сум го парсирал тоа.
Зошто Србија ја напраиле триаголник во средината?
Како што пишав, следната лага е веќе добро спакувана и истата само зема замав.
Никој повеќе не го интересира дали има барем трошка вистина важно истата да се повторува се додека и последниот не поверува.
интересен е првиот коментар,
Дали се работи за истиот Блумберг што постојано не убедува дека колапсот на кинеската економија, е готова работа???
Не дека пред да дојде Калигула не се лажеше ама со неговото доајџање на власт измамата-лагата станаа основна алатка за креирање на јавната мисла, мислам дека ни ВИ не може да се мери со капацитетот на Калигула за креирање на лажни вести..
Претходните денови не утепаа од лажни инфо дека Индија престанала да купува нафта од РФ, а вчера Лавров дава изјава дека не знае ништо за тоа и дека Индија не ги известила за такво нешто, јеботе која лажовчина е Калигула секоја му чест, како има такви коуци кај нас кои му веруваат па уште со тоа и се гордеат, со што се хранат таквите!
Никој повеќе не го интересира дали има барем трошка вистина важно истата да се повторува се додека и последниот не поверува.
интересен е првиот коментар,
Дали се работи за истиот Блумберг што постојано не убедува дека колапсот на кинеската економија, е готова работа???
Не дека пред да дојде Калигула не се лажеше ама со неговото доајџање на власт измамата-лагата станаа основна алатка за креирање на јавната мисла, мислам дека ни ВИ не може да се мери со капацитетот на Калигула за креирање на лажни вести..
Претходните денови не утепаа од лажни инфо дека Индија престанала да купува нафта од РФ, а вчера Лавров дава изјава дека не знае ништо за тоа и дека Индија не ги известила за такво нешто, јеботе која лажовчина е Калигула секоја му чест, како има такви коуци кај нас кои му веруваат па уште со тоа и се гордеат, со што се хранат таквите!
Ron Burgundy
137
Лаже Калигула доста, секоја изјава му е различна, исто и на неговите медиуми.
Vanlok
deus ex machina
- Член од
- 30 мај 2009
- Мислења
- 31.779
- Поени од реакции
- 42.865
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio just gave one of the most explicitly pro-colonialist speeches I have seen in the 21st century.
The US empire wants Europe to help it recolonize the Global South.
Rubio praised Western colonialists for "settl[ing] new continents, build[ing] vast empires extending out across the globe".
Then Rubio complained about the Global South's decolonization, portraying it as a sinister communist plot.
Rubio lamented: "The great Western empires had entered into terminal decline, accelerated by godless communist revolutions and by anti-colonial uprisings that would transform the world and drape the red hammer and sickle across vast swaths of the map in the years to come".
Rubio delivered this speech at the Munich Security Conference, surrounded by European leaders, who gave him a standing ovation. They loved the pro-colonialist diatribe.
The US secretary of state insisted that North American and European imperialists should unite in order to reverse "the West’s managed decline", to revive "the West’s age of dominance", to "renew the greatest civilization in human history".
This is a blatant call by the US empire to resuscitate Western colonialism and recolonize the Global South (which represents the Global Majority).
What the US empire did to Gaza, Venezuela, and currently Cuba is what it wants to do to the entire Global South.
This is from the official transcript published by the US State Department:
Joey-Jojo Jr. Shabadoo
"Hey, Joey Jo-Jo!"
- Член од
- 14 август 2006
- Мислења
- 47.823
- Поени од реакции
- 90.678
Vanlok
deus ex machina
- Член од
- 30 мај 2009
- Мислења
- 31.779
- Поени од реакции
- 42.865
7,000 FPV drones a day
200+ glide bombs
102,000 long-range strike drones projected for 2026.
Smaller assault groups took a third more territory in 2025 than 2024, with fewer losses.
Russia's newly built tanks aren't going back to Ukraine—they're deploying toward Finland.
Europe either acts now or faces Russia escalating on its own terms.
Автоматски споено мислење:
Vanlok
deus ex machina
- Член од
- 30 мај 2009
- Мислења
- 31.779
- Поени од реакции
- 42.865
Нешто интересно за Иран и нивното инсистирање на целосна самосталност.
The USrael-Iran war is not a "proxy war between the US and China", as some pseudo-analysts are trying to claim.
Russia and China are definitely interested in Iran remaining a regional power. And both countries do provide support to Iran. But Iran has a host of problems that prevent deeper military cooperation.
There is a timeline in which Iran and Russia are much closer military allies, and Russia did make some moves in that direction, but it was always Iran that did not want to commit to a real alliance with Russia. Again, they have their reasons -- our countries were extremely hostile to each other in 1979-1991, the USSR backed Saddam, the Iranians backed the Mujaheddin in Afghanistan, Hezbollah was as anti-Soviet as it was anti-American, etc.
Things were somewhat normalized in the 90s, but Russia itself was under extreme Western influence, so it complied with sanctions and arms sales boycotts, etc. Since the 00s, the relationship has been improving significantly, but it takes time, and many systemic reasons -- on both sides, but moreso on the Iranian side -- have prevented the partnership from turning into a real alliance. Likewise, Iran does not have a real alliance with China, for many of the same reasons.
Iran has always insisted on being an *independent* regional power that has beneficial relationships with other major powers, not a junior partner in a broader axis. That is their right. It comes with benefits. But it also comes with downsides...
I've said for years that the best solution to Iran's problems would have been to formally shelter under the Russian nuclear umbrella and ask Rosatom to take over their entire nuclear program. They very likely could have a nuke shield, NPPs and a permanent Russian military presence by now. They actually did have a Russian military base for a short while, in Hamadan. It was providing air support to Iranian proxy forces who were fighting ISIS. The Iranians *expelled* the Russian air base because it made the nationalist hardliners mad to have a Russian military presence publicly acknowledged.
I will also add: if the Iranians had not been so stubbornly nationalistic, there's a fair chance Syria would still be around as an ally. They persistently sabotaged all Russian attempts at political, economic and military reform in Syria because they perceived them as an encroachment on their own influence in the country. Which reduced trust between Moscow and Tehran, and ultimately cost the Iranians a significant ally and access to a lot of proxy forces.
It's a very long story.
For example, in Aleppo, the Iranians manufactured disorder and staged violence against civilians specifically to disrupt Russian military police operations, with Iranian proxy forces sometimes even attacking pro-Russian Syrian paramilitary forces. They held Aleppo airport outside of Russian coordination and used it as a corridor to Iraq to bypass Russian oversight. They increased pressure until Russian military police withdrew from Aleppo, and the disorder and clashes stopped overnight. It was a sustained Iranian anti-Russia operation. This happened in other places, too. The goal was to have Iranian proxies have control instead of Syrian government forces.
They kept the Fourth Division of the SAA entirely out of Russian restructuring efforts and turned it into a parallel army and an Iranian proxy force. The Iranians ran the Syrian National Defence Forces as an Iranian puppet army and steered the government to feeding recruits into the NDF and various Iranian proxy militias instead of the SAA and particularly the Fifth Corps, which was a Russian attempt to build a real, professional Syrian fighting force. Syrian Generals on Iran's payroll actually STOLE entire weapon shipments from the Fifth Corps and gave them to Hezbollah or sold them to the black market.
They used political intrigue to push aside Syrian figures such as Asef al-Dikr, who was the key Russia liaison to reforming the Syrian Arab Army. They used their influence in Damascus to appoint Iranian puppets to important posts to block Russian institutional penetration, also preventing any systemic reform of the SAA.
That's just a small part of the military aspects; there was also the 2018 deal the Iranians forced upon Assad that gave Iran exclusive rights to rebuild the Syrian military-industrial complex, fucking with Russian efforts even more. You could write entire books on the various ways the Iranians and pro-Iranian elements in the Syrian government prevented Russia from fixing anything long-term.
The USrael-Iran war is not a "proxy war between the US and China", as some pseudo-analysts are trying to claim.
Russia and China are definitely interested in Iran remaining a regional power. And both countries do provide support to Iran. But Iran has a host of problems that prevent deeper military cooperation.
There is a timeline in which Iran and Russia are much closer military allies, and Russia did make some moves in that direction, but it was always Iran that did not want to commit to a real alliance with Russia. Again, they have their reasons -- our countries were extremely hostile to each other in 1979-1991, the USSR backed Saddam, the Iranians backed the Mujaheddin in Afghanistan, Hezbollah was as anti-Soviet as it was anti-American, etc.
Things were somewhat normalized in the 90s, but Russia itself was under extreme Western influence, so it complied with sanctions and arms sales boycotts, etc. Since the 00s, the relationship has been improving significantly, but it takes time, and many systemic reasons -- on both sides, but moreso on the Iranian side -- have prevented the partnership from turning into a real alliance. Likewise, Iran does not have a real alliance with China, for many of the same reasons.
Iran has always insisted on being an *independent* regional power that has beneficial relationships with other major powers, not a junior partner in a broader axis. That is their right. It comes with benefits. But it also comes with downsides...
I've said for years that the best solution to Iran's problems would have been to formally shelter under the Russian nuclear umbrella and ask Rosatom to take over their entire nuclear program. They very likely could have a nuke shield, NPPs and a permanent Russian military presence by now. They actually did have a Russian military base for a short while, in Hamadan. It was providing air support to Iranian proxy forces who were fighting ISIS. The Iranians *expelled* the Russian air base because it made the nationalist hardliners mad to have a Russian military presence publicly acknowledged.
I will also add: if the Iranians had not been so stubbornly nationalistic, there's a fair chance Syria would still be around as an ally. They persistently sabotaged all Russian attempts at political, economic and military reform in Syria because they perceived them as an encroachment on their own influence in the country. Which reduced trust between Moscow and Tehran, and ultimately cost the Iranians a significant ally and access to a lot of proxy forces.
It's a very long story.
For example, in Aleppo, the Iranians manufactured disorder and staged violence against civilians specifically to disrupt Russian military police operations, with Iranian proxy forces sometimes even attacking pro-Russian Syrian paramilitary forces. They held Aleppo airport outside of Russian coordination and used it as a corridor to Iraq to bypass Russian oversight. They increased pressure until Russian military police withdrew from Aleppo, and the disorder and clashes stopped overnight. It was a sustained Iranian anti-Russia operation. This happened in other places, too. The goal was to have Iranian proxies have control instead of Syrian government forces.
They kept the Fourth Division of the SAA entirely out of Russian restructuring efforts and turned it into a parallel army and an Iranian proxy force. The Iranians ran the Syrian National Defence Forces as an Iranian puppet army and steered the government to feeding recruits into the NDF and various Iranian proxy militias instead of the SAA and particularly the Fifth Corps, which was a Russian attempt to build a real, professional Syrian fighting force. Syrian Generals on Iran's payroll actually STOLE entire weapon shipments from the Fifth Corps and gave them to Hezbollah or sold them to the black market.
They used political intrigue to push aside Syrian figures such as Asef al-Dikr, who was the key Russia liaison to reforming the Syrian Arab Army. They used their influence in Damascus to appoint Iranian puppets to important posts to block Russian institutional penetration, also preventing any systemic reform of the SAA.
That's just a small part of the military aspects; there was also the 2018 deal the Iranians forced upon Assad that gave Iran exclusive rights to rebuild the Syrian military-industrial complex, fucking with Russian efforts even more. You could write entire books on the various ways the Iranians and pro-Iranian elements in the Syrian government prevented Russia from fixing anything long-term.