Русија - смена во надворешната политика?

Член од
28 март 2006
Мислења
17.773
Поени од реакции
12.237
Да пренесам еден текст за Русија и политиката на балканот. Дали и колку е вистинит, не знам.
 

Vanlok

deus ex machina
Член од
30 мај 2009
Мислења
25.726
Поени од реакции
33.971
Mногу конфузно, не разбрав точно за што зборуваат но само од полуписменото изразување и од бомбастичниот наслов би рекол дека се некои бљувотини... Патем државноста сама по себе веќе некое време дефакто ја немаме, а тоа за „територијалните размени“ не е објаснето ни откаде доаѓа тезата ни ништо конкретно. Извори се разбира не се наведуваат.
 
Член од
28 март 2006
Мислења
17.773
Поени од реакции
12.237
Не знам. И мене ми изгледаше нафрлено. Инаку весников доста текстови посветува на русите и србите, повеќето во негативна конотација.
 

Vanlok

deus ex machina
Член од
30 мај 2009
Мислења
25.726
Поени од реакции
33.971
In all likelihood, Turkish military personnel would be required to assist in operating the drone flights. ...

Moreover, it is highly pertinent that France and Germany – the two other guarantors of the Minsk Accord along with Russia – have remained silent despite the continual violations of the ceasefire in Donbass by the Kiev regime’s forces. Every week, there are offensive shelling and mortar attacks across the Contact Line hitting civilian sites in Donetsk. Yet Paris and Berlin keep a stony silence. This is but a silent complicity in condoning aggression.




 

Björn

Does Your Mother Know?
Член од
14 август 2006
Мислења
45.023
Поени од реакции
83.448
Да пренесам еден текст за Русија и политиката на балканот. Дали и колку е вистинит, не знам.
Дали некад имаш прочитано нешто друго од овој сајт?
На пример ова:
или ова:
 
Последно уредено:
Член од
20 април 2012
Мислења
3.678
Поени од реакции
9.691
Да пренесам еден текст за Русија и политиката на балканот. Дали и колку е вистинит, не знам.
Испаѓа дека бугарите се борат да станиме срби???:cautious:
 

Vanlok

deus ex machina
Член од
30 мај 2009
Мислења
25.726
Поени од реакции
33.971
French member of the European Parliament Thierry Mariani slammed ongoing naval exercises by the USS Porter and USS Whitney as "clearly a provocation" by Washington.

"The presence of the 'Mount Whitney', flagship of the US Sixth Fleet and the USS Porter in the Black Sea, as well as the NATO naval maneuvers, are clearly a provocation of Russia," Mariani said.

He issued the statements in an interview to Russia's Sputnik: "Can you imagine what the American reaction would be if the Russian navy organized maneuvers in international waters off the American coast, near Washington DC?" he questioned.


And on NATO encroachment in eastern Europe and around the Black Sea, he said:

"NATO should have been dismantled at the same time as the Warsaw Pact was suppressed in the last century and the present expansion, and projection by NATO of military forces to the whole world is very alarming."

The statements appeared to back provocative statements made days ago by Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu, who said, "This is an almost constant attempt to test us, to check how ready we are, how much we have built the entire [defense] system off the Black Sea coast."


 
Член од
16 декември 2009
Мислења
1.323
Поени од реакции
1.162
Вчера Шојгу и Лавров разговараа со нивните француски колеги во формат 2+2.
Делуваше дека нема некој напредок.Ако нема,тогаш се знае што следува во Украина.
Сепак да оставиме уште некоја шанса на дипломаттијата.
 

Vanlok

deus ex machina
Член од
30 мај 2009
Мислења
25.726
Поени од реакции
33.971
Нешто прилично важно во големата слика на работите... Зошто е тоа така кој разбира разбира а кој не разбира најверојатно џабе ќе се обидувам да му објаснувам. :)

 

Vanlok

deus ex machina
Член од
30 мај 2009
Мислења
25.726
Поени од реакции
33.971


So Russian President Vladimir Putin, all by himself, and US President Joe Biden, surrounded by aides, finally had their secret video link conference for two hours and two minutes – with translators placed in different rooms.

That was their first serious exchange since they met in person in Geneva last June – the first Russia-US summit since 2018.

For global public opinion, led to believe a “war” in Ukraine was all but imminent, what’s left is essentially a torrent of spin.

So let’s start with a simple exercise focusing on the key issue of the video link – Ukraine -, contrasting the White House and Kremlin versions of what happened.

  • The White House: Biden made it “clear” to Putin that the US and allies will respond with “decisive economic and other measures” to the military escalation in Ukraine. At the same time, Biden called on Putin to de-escalate around Ukraine and “return to diplomacy”.
  • Kremlin: Putin offered Biden to nullify all restrictions on the functioning of diplomatic missions. He remarked that cooperation between Russia and the US is still in an “unsatisfactory” state. He urged the US not to shift “responsibility on the shoulders of Russia” for the escalation of the situation around Ukraine.
  • The White House: the US will expand military aid to Ukraine if Russia takes steps against it.
  • Kremlin: Putin told Biden that Russia is interested in obtaining legally fixed guarantees excluding NATO’s eastward expansion and the deployment of offensive strike systems in Russia’s neighboring countries.
  • The White House: Biden did not give Putin any commitments that Ukraine will remain outside NATO.
Minsk or bust
Now for what really matters: the red line.

What Putin diplomatically told Team Biden, sitting at their table, is that Russia’s red line – no Ukraine on NATO – is unmovable. The same applies to Ukraine turned into a hub of the Pentagon’s Empire of Bases, and hosting NATO weaponry.

Washington may deny it ad infinitum, but Ukraine is part of Russia’s sphere of influence. If nothing is done to force Kiev to abide by the Minsk Agreement, Russia will “neutralize” the threat in its own terms.

The root cause of all this drama, absent from any NATOstan narrative, is straightforward: Kiev simply refuses to respect the February 2015 Minsk Agreement.

According to the deal, Kiev should grant autonomy to Donbass via a constitutional amendment, referred to as “special status”; issue a general amnesty; and start a dialogue with the people’s republics of Donetsk and Lugansk.

Over the years, Kiev fulfilled less than zero of these commitments – while the NATOstan media machine kept spinning that Russia was violating Minsk. Russia is not even mentioned (italics mine) in the agreement.

Moscow always respected the Minsk Agreement – which establishes Donbass as an integral, autonomous part of Ukraine. Russia has made it very clear, over and over again, it has no interest whatsoever in promoting regime change in Kiev.

Before the video link, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov remarked, “Putin will listen to Biden’s proposals on Ukraine ‘with great interest.'” Even the White House states Team Biden did not propose for Kiev to obey the Minsk Agreement. So regardless of what Team Biden may have said, Putin, pragmatically, will adopt a “wait and see” approach, and then act accordingly.

In the run up to the video link, maximum hype revolved around Washington seeking to stop Nord Stream 2 if Russia “invades” Ukraine.

What never transpires out of the “invasion” narrative, repeated ad nauseam across NATOstan, is that hawks overseeing an immensely polarized US, corroded from the inside, desperately need a war in what military analyst Andrei Martyanov calls “country 404”, a black hole contiguous to Europe.

The crux of the matter is that imperial European vassals must not have access to Russian energy: only American LNG.

And that’s what led the most extreme Russophobes in Washington to start threatening sanctions on Putin’s inner circle, Russian energy producers, and even disconnecting Russia from SWIFT. All that was supposed to prevent Russia from “invading” Country 404.

Secretary of State Tony Blinken – present at the video link – said a few days ago in Riga that “if Russia invades Ukraine”, NATO will respond “with a range of high impact economic measures.” As for NATO, it’s far from aggressive: just a “defensive” organization.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, in early December, at the OCSE Ministerial Council meeting in Stockholm, was already warning that “strategic stability” in Europe was “rapidly eroding”.

Lavrov said, “NATO refuses to consider our proposals on de-escalation of tensions and prevention of dangerous incidents…On the contrary, the alliance’s military infrastructure is moving closer to Russia’s borders… The nightmarish scenario of military confrontation is returning.”

So no wonder the heart of the matter, for Moscow, is NATO encroachment. The “invasion” narrative is crass fake news sold as fact. Even the CIA’s William Burns admitted that US intel had no intel to “conclude” that Russia will dutifully answer the War Inc. prayers and finally “invade” Ukraine.

Still that did not prevent a German sensationalist rag from presenting the full contours of the Russian blitzkrieg, when the actual story is the US and NATO attempting to push “country 404” to commit suicide by attacking the people’s republics of Donetsk and Lugansk.

That legally binding guarantee
It’s idle to expect the video link to produce practical results. As NATOstan remains mired in concentric crises, the current level of high tension between NATO and Russia is a gift from heaven in terms of maintaining the convenient narrative of an external Slavic evil. It’s also an extra bonus for the military-industrial-intelligence-media-think tank complex.

The tension will continue to simmer without becoming incandescent only if NATO does not expand in any shape or form inside Ukraine. Diplomats in Brussels routinely comment that Kiev will never be accepted as a NATO member. But if things can get worse, they will: Kiev will become one of those NATO special partners, a desperately poor, hungry for territory, rogue actor.

Putin demanding from the US – which runs NATO – a written, legally binding guarantee that the alliance will not advance further eastward towards Russian borders is the game-changer here.

Team Biden cannot possibly deliver:
they would be eaten alive by the War Inc. establishment. Putin studied his history and knows that Daddy Bush’s “promise” to Gorbachev on NATO expansion was just a lie. He knows those who run NATO will never commit themselves in writing.

So that allows Putin a full range of options to defend Russian national security. “Invasion” is a joke; Ukraine, rotting from the inside, consumed by fear, loathing, and poverty, will remain in limbo, while Donetsk and Lugansk will be progressively interconnected with the Russian Federation.

There will be no NATO war on Russia – as Martyanov himself has extensively demonstrated NATO wouldn’t last five minutes against Russian hypersonic weapons. And Moscow will be focused on what really matters, geoeconomically and geopolitically: solidifying the Eurasia Economic Union (EAEU) and the Greater Eurasia Partnership.
 
Член од
16 декември 2009
Мислења
1.323
Поени од реакции
1.162
Мислам дека без вниманието кое е потребно помина едно вето на Русија во Советот за безбедност на ООН а беше во врска со тоа еколкгијата да се третира како безбедносен проблем.
Тоа беше еден неуспешен обид да се провре низ мала врата можн0оста да се интервенира во одредени земји поради Еколологија.
Полека САД ја наметнува екологијата на местото на досега веќе доволно искористените"човекови права" какоповод за наметнување на својата воља.
Секогаш се кријат позади благородни идеи кој на прв поглед изгледаат примамливо за обичниот човек за потоа да го покажат вистинското лице на иницјаторите за ставање во прв план на овие идеи.
Климатските промени се новата религија и секој кој нема да ја прифати на начин кој ќе биде поставен од американската елита ќе биде жигосан и изопштен.
Наводната борба за спречување на климатските промени ќе се претвори во уште еден камшик на САД за репресија на секој кој ќе се бори за сопствениот народ а тоа е по дефиниција против американските империјални хегемонистички и на крајот ќе се испостави фашизоидни амбиции.
 

Vanlok

deus ex machina
Член од
30 мај 2009
Мислења
25.726
Поени од реакции
33.971

Kajgana Shop

На врв Bottom