B
Bafra
Гостин
Ти саде за во УЈП си или инспектор. За нив сите се криминалци.И во случај на дерегулација и хиперрегулација факторот човек е тој кој прави пиздарии, не е до системот и доктрината на која иститот се базира.
Првиот Претседател на САД кој отворено застана против влијанието на воено индустрискиот комплекс и генерално влијанието на крупниот капитал врз носењето одлуки беше Двајт Ајзенхауер-Републиканец.
Првиот претседател кој беше елиминиран од истиот тој воено индустриски комплекс беше Џон Кенеди-Демократ.
Не е Кади Баба маката во идеологијата, доктрината или системот
Не може поради сомнеж дека некој ќе направи пиздарија се да одлучуваш, планираш, контролираш и регулираш.
Доколку некој направи пиздарија, тука треба да настапи државата со нејзините механизми за казнување.
Светот во периоди успевал да практицира капитализам па колку толку имаме развој.
А врска Енрон еве малку појаснување:
Wendy Gramm was the Chair of the CFTC 1988 to 1993. A former Enron board member and wife of energy deregulation architect, Phil Gramm, who dominated Congress for years. Previously, from 1985 to 1988, Wendy Gramm was head of the Office of Management and Budget’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA). Of course, politicians always appoint family members to further their power. After a lobbying campaign from Enron, the CFTC exempted it from regulation in trading of energy derivatives and Gramm was rewarded with a board member position, exactly as Alan Cohen received, who was the receiver in my case hired by Goldman Sachs. Gramm at least resigned from the CFTC and took a seat on the Enron Board of Directors, whereas Cohen remained the Court’s Receiver and worked as a board member at Goldman Sachs without resigning. This type of corruption is widespread.
After the Enron scandal, Gramm was never criminally charged but she and the other directors of the energy company were named in several investor lawsuits. Gramm and other Enron directors agreed to a $168 million dollar settlement in a suit led by the University of California. As part of that settlement, the directors agreed to collectively pay $13 million to settle claims of insider trading. The remainder of the settlement was to be paid by insurance.
Judge Painter wrote in his addressing the corruption in the courts he maintained that Judge Levine told him that he had promised former CFTC Chair Wendy Gramm, “That he would never rule in a complainant’s favor.” Painter’s notice went on to say, “A review of his rulings will confirm that he has fulfilled his vow.” Judge Painter explained his reasoning for exposing Levine. “If I simply announced my intention to retire, the seven reparation cases on my docket would be reassigned to the only other administrative law judge at the Commission, Judge Levine. This I could not do in good conscience.”
Then the WSJ ran an a article written by Sarah N. Lynch in support of the CFTC, accusing Judge Painter of mental unfitness and heavy drinking (Case Sheds Light on CFTC Judge – WSJ). They have never trashed a judge in such a manner. Why? Obviously they were trying to discredit Painter. The article omitted his attack on the Administrative Court System. It was a highly biased character assassination piece, written to support the CFTC. The LA Times, outside of the NYC cesspool, covered the story stating that the Judge Painter’s ruling should concern everyone. This illustrated the stark difference between NYC and the rest of the world.
Значи не ја амнестирај вината на државните службеници, посебно судии, а да етикираш лоши капиталисти и слободен пазар ќе го злоупотребат.
.
, се прашувам како успевале во тој период кога државата имала минимална улога 
.
. Врз кои информации само ли ги носиш твоите заклучоци и како ги обработуваш ти информации само ти си знаеш 
